- Joined
- 12 September 2004
- Posts
- 1,714
- Reactions
- 1
I wasn't a fan of the Howard government squandering the boom time gains with a lack of infrastructure spending and a lack of economic reform post GST (I was pro-GST for the record), but I do admit to regarding Costello as the greatest leader this country never had (in my time at least).Disagree. Although I was unhappy with the last period of the Howard government, overall I think they did a pretty good job. Pity that John Howard felt it necessary to be such an acolyte of George W, the result being we are still engaged in two wars we should have had nothing to do with.
They were - and IIRC polls at the time showed more than 50% of Australians were against the Iraq war as well, and I don't think the Afghan War has ever held too much popularity with the public at large either.Actually, that is indeed an area where the Greens would probably be positive, Explod. As I recall, they were against any commitment to either Afghanistan or Iraq?
Jesus! We'd have to ban the lot!!
In the past 20 years or so both ALP and Liberal have made wonderfull promises and delivered on very little in improving the overall quality of life. We work longer hours, we sit in trafic jams longer, there seems to be less disposable income for holidays and time out with the family and so on blah blah. So lots of money is not necessarily good.
The Greens make certain statments that are interpreted in certain ways but maybe they will not live up to the promises that many of you detest (even though they have not been tested) but come up with the oposite and things become improved.
No one can say for sure. We can say for sure that ALP and Liberal on past performance is bad.
I hope you are looking forward to a carbon tax because Bob Brown at the end of his NPC presentation has said one will be introduced during the next term.For me the Greens are looking like the only major party alternative and i will probably be voting for them.
Explod, the Greens have made it very clear that when they have the balance of power they will insist on having their demands met in exchange for passing legislation. e.g. they WILL have an ETS and it will be one which pays no regard to the economic consequences as long as they believe it's putting a high enough price on carbon.
Christine Milne is even more shrill and radical than Bob Brown.
The only plus for the Greens imo is that they are socially progressive.
Absolutely agree with Greens policy on this. We actually need to stop all progress now and learn to live a whole new way if this planet is to be saved for 2 or 3 generations hence.
Carbon is enemy No 1 Julia.
For a country whose economy is almost wholly dependent on it's extractive industries, what you say is sheer stupidity.
Absolutely agree with Greens policy on this. We actually need to stop all progress now and learn to live a whole new way if this planet is to be saved for 2 or 3 generations hence.
Carbon is enemy No 1 Julia.
When will you people understand that what Aus/NZ does is irrelevant on the grand scale of things. All "The Red.... errr, Greens" policies will achieve is the export of development and jobs to the third world.
This will have zero effect on purported anthropogenic climate change.
And this attitiude that it wont have an effect or wont work is worse than that of doomsayers.
When will you people understand that what Aus/NZ does is irrelevant on the grand scale of things. All "The Red.... errr, Greens" policies will achieve is the export of development and jobs to the third world.
This will have zero effect on purported anthropogenic climate change.
Too true, no place for idealism. However there are other countries doing much bigger things towards greening, and, we have to start somewhere IMO. The leaders would have you believe that we have a big effect on other countries.
And this attitiude that it wont have an effect or wont work is worse than that of doomsayers.
.
And as for Bob Brown, he can't even manage his own finances let alone be trusted with policies that govern the country. God forbid they manage to control the senate.
Cutting off food exports means that someone else goes hungry. Either that or someone else clears more land to expand global food production (ie negative for the global environment).If we shut our bourders we could provide enough food to feed ourselves and of course we can shelter ourselves. The Pakistani's would be happy with our country right now. We are just so lucky in Australia.
Under Maslow's hierarchy of needs we need no more to be healthy and well. Think right outside the square Calliope and think about some real change.
Oh God! I've tried really hard to be charitable about your utter naivete, Explod, but this is just too much.Absolutely agree with Greens policy on this. We actually need to stop all progress now and learn to live a whole new way if this planet is to be saved for 2 or 3 generations hence.
Carbon is enemy No 1 Julia.
Good question. Bob Brown and Christine Milne are now talking quite as though they will be The Government, making all the decisions, such is their hysterical delight in anticipation of having the balance of power.Bob Brown has stated that the Greens would not block supply. He has however stated that there would be a carbon tax during the next term of government even though both major parties have ruled it out.
What then could he horse trade for his carbon tax ?
The warmists just do not get this, Wayne. They have absolutely no idea about whether any sort of Australian ETS will make any difference to anything at all, but it makes them feel all warm and fuzzy to be able to say "well, at least we're doing something".When will you people understand that what Aus/NZ does is irrelevant on the grand scale of things. All "The Red.... errr, Greens" policies will achieve is the export of development and jobs to the third world.
This will have zero effect on purported anthropogenic climate change.
But the Greens' fans don't spare a millisecond's thought for the economy, moXJO. They just want to feel good, even if they're not quite sure why.Thank you....
Taxing us on carbon emissions to save the planet
How about investing in clean coal technologies that China and India might actually use and make a difference.
You know if the shooters party actually brought out a policy on shooting greens, then they would swing my vote and provide a useful service.
I've got an idea how about those wanting an ETS can pay for it.
And as for Bob Brown, he can't even manage his own finances let alone be trusted with policies that govern the country. God forbid they manage to control the senate.
Is carbon really the enemy? Or is it too many people using too many resources, fossil fuels included, that are the real problem?Absolutely agree with Greens policy on this. We actually need to stop all progress now and learn to live a whole new way if this planet is to be saved for 2 or 3 generations hence.
Carbon is enemy No 1 Julia.
Which significant countries have actually shifted to cleaner energy in a signficant way (assuming we're talking about climate change as the issue here) other than by means of swapping one unustainable energy source for another, collapsing their economy or by simply exporting their emissions?Too true, no place for idealism. However there are other countries doing much bigger things towards greening, and, we have to start somewhere IMO. The leaders would have you believe that we have a big effect on other countries.
And this attitiude that it wont have an effect or wont work is worse than that of doomsayers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?