- Joined
- 12 September 2004
- Posts
- 1,714
- Reactions
- 1
Re: The Greens - The New Radical Socialists
Certainly a contrast to the current leadership vacuum we're experiencing with the major parties at the moment (Swan & Hockey as the alternate choices for treasurer! God help us).
Afghanistan is unwinnable - the region has been in an almost perpetual state of war for decades and the entire might of the Soviet Union failed in Afghanistan; how will the US with a much lower commitment, along with a rag tag bunch of small contributions of other countries & whatever mercenary tribes they can pay, possibly compete?
The only regular standing army to actually defeat an insurgent militia since WW2 was the British army in Malaysia - and that was by virtually closing down every village in the country during nightfall. This is an impossibility in Afghanistan.
I wasn't a fan of the Howard government squandering the boom time gains with a lack of infrastructure spending and a lack of economic reform post GST (I was pro-GST for the record), but I do admit to regarding Costello as the greatest leader this country never had (in my time at least).Disagree. Although I was unhappy with the last period of the Howard government, overall I think they did a pretty good job. Pity that John Howard felt it necessary to be such an acolyte of George W, the result being we are still engaged in two wars we should have had nothing to do with.
Certainly a contrast to the current leadership vacuum we're experiencing with the major parties at the moment (Swan & Hockey as the alternate choices for treasurer! God help us).
They were - and IIRC polls at the time showed more than 50% of Australians were against the Iraq war as well, and I don't think the Afghan War has ever held too much popularity with the public at large either.Actually, that is indeed an area where the Greens would probably be positive, Explod. As I recall, they were against any commitment to either Afghanistan or Iraq?
Afghanistan is unwinnable - the region has been in an almost perpetual state of war for decades and the entire might of the Soviet Union failed in Afghanistan; how will the US with a much lower commitment, along with a rag tag bunch of small contributions of other countries & whatever mercenary tribes they can pay, possibly compete?
The only regular standing army to actually defeat an insurgent militia since WW2 was the British army in Malaysia - and that was by virtually closing down every village in the country during nightfall. This is an impossibility in Afghanistan.