Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Israel in the Gaza Strip

repeat after me - ISLAM ISN'T A RACE :banghead:

rowie said:
Obviously you havent a clue - and the audacity to speak of palestinians as a tribal backward culture.

yeah, a culture that routinely practices honour killings is modern and enlightened :rolleyes:

chops_a_must said:
Israel's biggest enemy over the years, Fatah, is a secular organisation that represents Christians as well as Muslims

right so the rest of the arab world that has on numerous occasions invaded israel with the express purpose of wiping them from the face of the earth, and who fund, equip and train palestinian terrorists don't count as big enemies of israel? i didn't know there was a scale of enemies from "biggest" to "smallest"

bushman said:
Anyway the point that was being made was that you cannot view conflicts with a root in history from a modern, Australian viewpoint?

why not? i would think from the outside, with the emotion and cultural baggage removed one could have a clearer view of a groups actions without the usual justifications people use to condone murder and terror.

bushman said:
Not sure why the broad brush of Islam was bought into the debate? Its like drawing a conclusion about Christianity based on the on-going butchery in the 'Catholic' Congo.

no, its nothing like it at all. christianity doesn't condone "go forth and kill the unbelievers" like islam does. christianity doesn't fund and support organisations who strap bombs to their followers and blow themselves up on crowded buses like islam does.

a heady mix of tribal nationalism and religion are the root causes of these conflicts, and when your religion compels you to exterminate your enemy (as hamas clearly and succinctly states) then there is your eternal, non negotiable justification for continuing the campaign. victory or death, not much scope for peace is there?

rowie said:
Chops, I wouldnt bother responding to disarrays ignorant racist threads, you would get more talking to a wall. These people dont realise that this whole conflict is not based on religion but on territory/land acquisition and resources. Disarray simplifies it in his mind by narrowing it down to base it on a conflict between forward and backward civilisations and religion - As I said before, he hasnt a clue. I wouldnt bother trying to school him...

yeah well done making your own assumptions up on that high horse rowie. i'll make my point a bit more clearly for you.

yes a large part of the conflict is land and resources, most conflicts come down to that because thats what people fight about. however the justifications for the conflict, the means by which people contine the fight and the spiritual rewards obtained by martyring yourself rest firmly on a religious foundation.

in the mosques and on the street corners, imams admonish the people to fight israel to the death because its what god wants. allah doesn't want peace, allah wants victory and domination, THEN you have your dar es salaam. i remember travelling through southern lebanon seeing exactly this kind of behaviour, public rallies with imams ranting to kill israel blah blah blah and masses of people all getting whipped up into a frenzy. this kind of behaviour does not lend itself for civil discourse or negotiation.

money and materials (like the rockets the palestinians keep lobbing at israel) also come in from neighbouring muslim states, who publicly state their affinity with their muslim brothers and vent the usual fire and brimstone death to israel rhetoric we're getting sick of hearing. although they don't have enough affinity to resettle the palestinians in their own countries because they are more useful where they are as a propaganda tool right?

then we have the suicide bombers. in islam to die as a martyr is rewarded in heaven, so training your children to hate jews and then grow up to blow themselves up is a noble calling. i've seen more than one palestinian mother shed a tear of joy and say how proud she was young mohammed is in heaven after killing a busload of people.

so way to whitewash the entire religious aspect to the conflict, because the fact jews and muslims have been at each others throats over the "holy land" for more than a thousand years couldn't possibly have any bearing on this conflict could it? anyway islam is the religion of peace right? as long as you're a muslim. of the right sect.
 
Disarray -
1: your racism refers to your statement that the palestinians are a backward culture. Referring to an entire race of people as backward to my mind has a hint of racism to it.
2: Palestinian culture routinely practice honor killings - That statement proves my point that you are ignorant on many levels regarding the cultures of these people.
3: South Lebanon sermons in mosques?? Are you for real or have you just made that up to strengthen your argument? I myself am of Lebanese background and have never experienced such sermons on any number of occasions over there.
 
Changing the subject slightly, does anyone know if the concept of an Israeli state carried much weight before Hitler? I mean, what chance was there of it coming about without WW2?
 
Changing the subject slightly, does anyone know if the concept of an Israeli state carried much weight before Hitler? I mean, what chance was there of it coming about without WW2?
Virtually none.

It had been promised to the Palestinians for their support of the British in WW1. Which is why the British refused to grant Israel a state, opposed partition and did all they could to stop it.
 
disarray,

i thought i was pretty conservative on the israel issue. and i do believe israel has a right to live in peace and to destroy terror organisations that threaten it.... but your posts border on inciting religious, ethnic and raical violence.


somethign you would find on extremist sites.

i dont think that is a path we should be following
 
no, its nothing like it at all. christianity doesn't condone "go forth and kill the unbelievers" like islam does. christianity doesn't fund and support organisations who strap bombs to their followers and blow themselves up on crowded buses like islam does.

.

I am assuming you are talking about the 21st century where Euro-Christian democracies control most of the wealth, armaments and power?

History does not judge Christianity as kindly i.e the Crusades, the Inquisition, Colonialism etc

"And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn you away from the LORD your God..." (Deuteronomy 13: 5)
 
I myself am of Lebanese background
Hi Rowie,
Nice to have you on the forums. I have a question regarding the learning of Arabic.
Are Egyptian Arabic and the Arabic you probably speak very different so much as to not be able to communicate? Or are they quite similar much like Us and Australian English?
 
Probably for all the wrong reasons, but in hindsight perhaps it's a pity the British didn't prevail. Do the Jews in America and Australia really need Israel to exist? The concept of homeland is strong I grant you, but if you were born elsewhere it hardly matters except in some romantic sense.
 
Virtually none.

It had been promised to the Palestinians for their support of the British in WW1. Which is why the British refused to grant Israel a state, opposed partition and did all they could to stop it.
Chops,
At the end of world war two why didn't the British stop the Zionists from taking the land? Did they think the arab nations could do it?
 
1: your racism refers to your statement that the palestinians are a backward culture. Referring to an entire race of people as backward to my mind has a hint of racism to it.

to my mind it doesn't. i am an australian raised and educated with western values so things like honour killings are considered barbaric and backward by our cultural standards. this doesn't make me racist, and i have every right to criticise practices i feel are morally reprehensible, and criticise belief systems i feel are objectionable. you are free to do the same. well, you are free to do the same here in australia, maybe not in saudi arabia or iran or china, but thats one of the perks of living in the western world isn't it?

so are you saying you don't consider things like honour killings, child brides and sharia laws backward?

2: Palestinian culture routinely practice honor killings - That statement proves my point that you are ignorant on many levels regarding the cultures of these people.

so they don't practice honour killings?

3: South Lebanon sermons in mosques?? Are you for real or have you just made that up to strengthen your argument?

yes i am for real, yes i saw it, yes it strengthens my argument. now lets make some points instead of just attacking the poster ok?
 
Probably for all the wrong reasons, but in hindsight perhaps it's a pity the British didn't prevail. Do the Jews in America and Australia really need Israel to exist? The concept of homeland is strong I grant you, but if you were born elsewhere it hardly matters except in some romantic sense.

You will find that Jewish immigration to the US and Australia peaked during and just after WWII. Hence the strong support for Israel.
 
Chops,
At the end of world war two why didn't the British stop the Zionists from taking the land? Did they think the arab nations could do it?

They did try to.

But the Irgun set out to kill all Britons in Palestine. The Brits didn't want another war, it was not popular at home and there was significant pressure from the US to relent.
 
I am assuming you are talking about the 21st century where Euro-Christian democracies control most of the wealth, armaments and power?

History does not judge Christianity as kindly i.e the Crusades, the Inquisition, Colonialism etc

"And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn you away from the LORD your God..." (Deuteronomy 13: 5)

hi bushman, we're not talking about 1000 years ago, we are talking about NOW. the 21st century. people always dredge up historical bs arguments in threads like this. here's a newsflash, human history is full of barbarity from all races and most creeds.

what we should be doing is looking at what are people doing and saying NOW. what are their actions and attitudes NOW. not "so and so did so and so to my people 1000 years ago", we will never ever ever progress as long as people keep bringing up ancient butthurts.

judge people by their actions TODAY, not last week, not last century, not last millenium, TODAY.
 
hi bushman, we're not talking about 1000 years ago, we are talking about NOW. the 21st century. people always dredge up historical bs arguments in threads like this. here's a newsflash, human history is full of barbarity from all races and most creeds.

Didn't you bring something from the 1300s into this argument?
 
Sorry Bushman, are you saying it peaked because thereafter Jews could choose to go to Israel instead? Of course, some would, but I'd like to see some figures to know how many percentage-wise chose to put in the hard yards surrounded by hostile neighbours. I'm guessing, but I would have thought not so very many all up.
 
They did try to.

But the Irgun set out to kill all Britons in Palestine. The Brits didn't want another war, it was not popular at home and there was significant pressure from the US to relent.

Yes. And how ironic is it? Realistically, the Zionists in Palestine at that time invented modern terrorism.
 
Top