- Joined
- 23 November 2004
- Posts
- 3,974
- Reactions
- 850
There is a difference between deliberately causing death or injury and irresponsibly causing death or injury.
From the Islamic terror attacks around the world.
So the tiny risk of a muslim killing someone because of their religion, is totally offset by the reduced chance of muslims killing due to drink driving.
.
. Just like the German populace in WW2.
Why bring any more problems to Australia? It's a no brainer.
the higher the proportion of Muslims the more danger they pose because of their ideology that motivates some of them to violence.
the higher the proportion of those from drinking cultures the more danger they pose because of their drug use that motivates some of them to violence and irresponsible behaviour.
Islam is indeed evil......
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nat...s/news-story/cabfb99aebe52ebcac836ad4d1fd51f0
Islamic State calls for murder of Australian Islamic clerics
Islamic State has called for the deaths of three prominent Australian Islamic scholars in a new propaganda video.
Youth leader Sheikh Shady Alsuleiman, NSW Police Force chaplain Sheikh Ahmed Abdo and the Grand Mufti of Australia, Ibrahim Abu Mohamed are slammed as “apostates” in the video — a crime punishable by death according to radical Islam.
The video calls on followers to kill the three men, and mentions other leaders from across the Islamic world, saying they’re “collaborators, informers and apostates” for discouraging violence.
That's why Islam will always be violent. The moderates will be scared to say anything. Just like the German populace in WW2.
Why bring any more problems to Australia? It's a no brainer.
Nonsense. Everyone who calls themselves Muslim has had exposure to that ideology which can turn into extremism so there is a defined risk, whereas non Muslims may not even drink, so their risk is undefined.
I think we have been through this before. The West is not taking on Islam in the ME, we are helping Muslim countries fight a threat to law and order in that area.
You may say we should just pull out and leave them to it. Maybe sell them arms like we did to Saddam. That's pretty risky if ISIL wins and has control over all those arms.
In the end we need a ME that we can deal with in a quasi civilised manner, not a bunch of psychos.
1.Nonsense. Everyone who calls themselves Muslim has had exposure to that ideology which can turn into extremism so there is a defined risk,
2. whereas non Muslims may not even drink, so their risk is undefined.
Nothing to do with that.We accepted a lot of German refugees and displaced people.
I was referring to the fact that the German populace could not complain about the Nazi's when they got into power for fear that they may be jailed or killed.
Did you know that WW2 was ended by refugee's,
They weren't Muslims though were they ?
Yes, and they assimilated into our community....They never gave us any problems like we are currently experiencing with Muslims...They were carefully selected with a trade having worked with so many in the plumbing trade...They quickly learned to speak English...I can also speak for the Italians.We accepted a lot of German refugees and displaced people.
I am not sure of the religion of all the people who worked on the project.
However as already stated about 1,000,000 muslim soldiers served on our side during WW2,
They weren't Muslims though were they ?
Here is video instructing Muslim men how to beat their wives and not only in Saudi Arabia but world wide.....If our men do the same thing here it is called domestic violence.
http://elicit.wixsite.com/the-watch...-TV-teaching-husbands-how-to-beat-their-wives
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?