Muslims have been here for generations. I went to schools with some of them... and suddenly they're all terrorists. Suddenly their religion will make them criminal and violent. Come on.
.
If Muslims are causing problems, .
Are they though?
Of course some of them are.
http://www.news.com.au/national/cri...d/news-story/86fc734df0963e21fe038c0eecce7d80
I believe in being nice to and networking with with moderate Muslims to prevent attacks, but the simple fact is that the more Muslims there are in this country the more attacks there are likely to be and the harder prevention becomes.
Of course some of them are.
.
What percentage of muslims are likely to commit acts of violence in this country?
Who knows ?
Rumpy, haven't been saying for years........The more Muslims we have the bigger muscles they get.
Rumpy, haven't been saying for years........The more Muslims we have the bigger muscles they get.
In the last 10 years, what has killed more Australians?
Islamic Terrorism or Alcohol fuelled violence and drink driving?
Considering muslims don't drink, maybe increasing the number of muslims in the population makes us safer.
If we rank the causes of death in Australia and put anywhere near the amount of funding and effort into preventing them, we'd save tens of thousands of lives a year.
Heard that in the US, there's some 20,000+ suicides a year. A fraction of the money they spent on anti-terrorism to provide counselling or community outreach or just informing family and friends of the issue so they can be aware if their family member need help... I bet a lot of those death could be prevented.
2996 Innocent people died in the world trade centre terrorist attack.
That same year in the USA, 2932 innocent people died due to drunk drivers.
Both terrorism and drink driving can be reduced. You can take licenses away from drink drivers and lock them up and you can keep out people who swear allegiance to a violent ideology.
In the last 10 years, what has killed more Australians?
Islamic Terrorism or Alcohol fuelled violence and drink driving?
Considering muslims don't drink, maybe increasing the number of muslims in the population makes us safer.
You must be able to see the difference, you are choosing to allow drinkers to have all their rights until they breach the law, where as you are happy to reduce the rights of the muslims before they have broken the law.
Even one terror attack is one too many......86 Australians killed in Bali.....86 good living people who should still be alive and enjoying life today.
Actually the pub lockout laws have dramatically reduced the number of alcohol related assaults in the area where they operate.
Is this a reduction of drinkers rights ?
2/3 of the public want the laws to stay.
Thats a direct action to a known problem, it's very different, if Islamic terror attacks were as common as alcohol violence, I might agree with more stricter rules, but they aren't.
Notice no one is calling for drinkers in general to be banned, If you are happy for a drinker to migrate here when you know there is a chance he could take someones life via drink driving or alcohol violence, but you don't want a muslim to come here because you are worried about terrorist attacks, thats an irrational fear.
2996 Innocent people died in the world trade centre terrorist attack.
That same year in the USA, 2932 innocent people died due to drunk drivers.
People call to Ban Muslim immigrants, due to "terrorism risk", but I have never heard of anyone calling to ban Australian, British, Irish or German immigrants due to "Drinking culture" associated with those countries and the added risk of drinking related deaths they would bring with them.
Big difference.
By "taking licenses away from drink drivers and locking them up", you are targeting the people that are committing the crimes, I totally agree with that.
By "Targeting muslims in general" you are not targeting the criminals, you are targeting an entire group, so its more like targeting drinkers in general or people from drinking cultures, rather than the actual drink drivers.
You must be able to see the difference, you are choosing to allow drinkers to have all their rights until they breach the law, where as you are happy to reduce the rights of the muslims before they have broken the law.
it would be like banning people of British decent from driving or going out on weekends because they are from a drinking culture, that inspires violence or risky behaviour.
Most muslims don't "swear allegiance to a violent ideology",
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?