- Joined
- 28 May 2006
- Posts
- 9,985
- Reactions
- 2
They brought down power lines too? I thought they shot someone.
Just an example that you don't need to be a perfect cop to get the basics right.
http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2008/s2444450.htm
Researchers from the University of NSW have found that people with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) ”” the second most common form of dementia in people under 65 ”” cannot detect sarcasm and are more gullible than other people.
Just like all humans.
Did you know that the great majority of people have more than the average number of legs?
It's obvious, really: Among the nominal 20 million people in Aus, there are probably 2,000 people who have only one leg. Therefore, the average number of legs is
((2000*1) + (19,998,000*2)) / 20,000,000 = 1.999
And because most people have two legs...
Did you hear about the politician who promised that if he were elected he'd make certain that everybody would get an above-average income?
Surely even shields and long batons in the hands of fully trained police officers can disarm a skinny kid, especially if there is four of you.
chops - I have a feeling that a few posters here trust everything the police do - unquestioned.
Liberty Victoria statistics show 42 people were shot dead by an officer between 1987 and 2005; more than double that of New South Wales in the same period
Or maybe some people, not having been there, simply reserve judgement and await the result of coroner's report.
THE KID WAS 57 KGS!!!!! 5'7!!!!
I cannot believe some adult cops with batons cant take him out, even with knives.
So what if he had a shaved head. How many men do?
How many teenagers have difficult times? especially growing up without a father.
This whole redneck right wing argument that he deserved to be shot, that our taxes pay for his bludging parents, etc etc is rubbish. A 15 yr old 57kg kid having a disturbed difficult time (thanks to our society no doubt) does not deserve to be shot. Period.
Haha... I love these.exactly - say Julia - have you ever heard of a case where the police were less than perfect.
btw, you're aware aren't you that there are calls for an independent enquiry into the police actions, - but sure enough it will be done by police.
personally think the police made the wrong desicion and shoulda zapped him with a tazar or at least attempted the ole baton in the chops trick first , after all there was a few of them.
Nope. Not agreed.Let's break some things down here:
1. A man that can run the 100m sprint in 10 seconds can do 10 m/s. Agreed?
Someone who can run it in 15 seconds can do it in roughly 7 m/s. So 15 metres is basically 2 seconds of thinking in the eyes of these officers?
Hilarious 20-20!Chops
I think you've successfully shown up a problem Snake has with following your arguments lol...
My attempt at petty humouristic sarcasm.They brought down power lines too? I thought they shot someone.
With a nice response from chops aren't a must.Quote:
Originally Posted by chops_a_must
Just an example that you don't need to be a perfect cop to get the basics right.
Really?Chops
I think you've successfully shown up a problem Snake has with following your arguments lol...
So are you saying he has dementia? I was the one using sarcasm and it wasn't detected.http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2008/s2444450.htm
Researchers from the University of NSW have found that people with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) — the second most common form of dementia in people under 65 — cannot detect sarcasm and are more gullible than other people.
Snake - if all human (groups) had more than most (in their group), then statistically and mathematically it doesn't add up.
Quite true.
Not sure.I think the demographic attracted by the force have more than most.
Just like all humans but NOT ALL humans. Like as in similar to.Quote:
Originally Posted by It's Snake Pliskin
Just like all humans.
True.Snake - if all human (groups) had more than most (in their group), then statistically and mathematically it doesn't add up.
Does that mean we are all spiders with eight legs but we just don't realise it?Quote:
Did you know that the great majority of people have more than the average number of legs?
Interesting stuff 20/20.It's obvious, really: Among the nominal 20 million people in Aus, there are probably 2,000 people who have only one leg. Therefore, the average number of legs is
((2000*1) + (19,998,000*2)) / 20,000,000 = 1.999
And because most people have two legs...
And blades gripped by his hands.PS It's arguably relevant I guess.
this kid could be just the 2001st Aussie with one leg ..
instead of being a corpse with a dozen bullets (half dozen whatever) in his tiny chest.
Don't go on about what the police did wrong. Just explain, exactly, what you would have done had it been your responsibility to contain the situation.
It may have been that there wasn't anything left they could do in that situation. Who knows? The fact that 3 of them shot, indicates that they were all largely on their weapons, which is what he wanted. Keeping hands away from their holsters in this situation may have been something that could have helped de-escalate the situation. Pepper spraying at less than 15m might have worked as well.Getting the cornered officer to stay away from their gun whilst the others made the call could also have been an option.
So a coronial enquiry will not be objective?Haha... I love these.
You can see the finding now, "Nothing to see here, move along. Our cops did nothing wrong. Extra resources, blah blah blah."
It's almost always an admission of guilt in itself.
Oh God, how typical of you 2020, with your absolute lack of logic.exactly - say Julia - have you ever heard of a case where the police were less than perfect.
So a coronial enquiry will not be objective?
Coroners are also corrupt in your view?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/12/14/2445974.htm?section=justin
He told reporters the shooting was being investigated by the homicide and Ethical Standards departments.
lol - your turn to do the next sudoku puzzle JuliaOh God, how typical of you 2020, with your absolute lack of logic.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?