- Joined
- 27 February 2008
- Posts
- 4,670
- Reactions
- 10
Oh Please. When you have been calling for falls over the last 20 days of the biggest % rally since god knows when then call for a rise just as we start to top out ya got to expect a little heat.
Your have been wrong. Simple as that. Take it.
Oh Please. When you have been calling for falls over the last 20 days of the biggest % rally since god knows when then call for a rise just as we start to top out ya got to expect a little heat.
Your have been wrong. Simple as that. Take it.
OZ the charts a Weekly so have given you both the weekly and Daily.
As you know AGET has algorithm wave counts so arent picture perfect.
I dont expect or need them to be in my trading.
The Weekly count (Major waves) look wrong and the lower timeframe count similar to Rudy's looks more symetrical. Ending wave 5 (3) This I prefer.Alternate count in BLUE.
Anyway trading it as a wave 4. until proven otherwise either way its bullish
Oh Please. When you have been calling for falls over the last 20 days of the biggest % rally since god knows when then call for a rise just as we start to top out ya got to expect a little heat.
Your have been wrong. Simple as that. Take it.
And I supposed you with your superior knowledge was able to clearly see that it would continue going up but forgot to mention it in advance
Why don't you do something really useful and take your know all moronic statements somewhere else. I have yet to see you make any comments of any value on this thread.
And i reckon about 11:45 or 1:00 Monday
Guys this is nonsense, Correct me if I'm wrong But,
[If you are wrong and stay wrong then its fair enough that someone points that out. Even if they aren't a fan of your application. Its not a personal attack its just a fact. You were wrong. Big deal get over it.
When an impulse wave begins to unfold, there is no way of knowing if that impulse wave will be a 5, 9 or 13 wave impulse wave before the event.
The next time one of you pick the great crash of 2010 or the great bull of 2019 you will rightly be boasting about it and reminding anyone when ever you are challenged.
As an outsider it does appear one can manipulate or dismiss the waves as one sees fit!
Techa appears to me as being rather optimistic. When Ozwaveguy appearing pessimistic.
Get rid of the emotion and with all emotion cast aside what do the various Elliott waves project?
A rebound has been expected. As these pics indicate on the all-ords and the US S&P. .... As much as I want to believe Techa I would think there is too much pessimism and concern kicking about for a good rebound at this time.
View attachment 28593
View attachment 28594
For me its not about being right or wrong.
Its about the analysis being correct until its proven to be incorrect.
Hi MR,
...... There are times when the pattern being revealed is pretty obvious and other times (such as during a highly complex corrective wave pattern) that the pattern possibly can't be determined until the pattern is almost complete.
...... There is no doubt that there is a natural tendency for any analyst to project their own pessimistic or optimistic bias into an interpretation but that bias is quickly eliminated through the correct application of the process. Cheers
Yes I also like both charts. Happy to post them here. I feel they do reflect along with the optimistic bias and (perhaps a change in the wind) towards Tech/a's trail of thought.
Those which stick out are the ones which I look for I'm only interested in direction. The rest comes from other analysis.
Now there are 9 and 13 waves?
No wonder you guys keep chasing shadows
I’ve got a gut feeling that somehow the E-waves will have predicted the exact highs in April, and the next BUY will be around a lower patterns in MAY.
LOL, excluding you, Not in this thread anyway!!
From the 12/3/09 above:
- Mean while, Nun's still shorting BHP....... Huh ........ Skip that bit..... but he's right ofcoarse... LOL, is that a LOL at Nun or a LOL at Nun being right, I can never tell when I read others posts.. LOL, no no, LOL I mean??? huh
- .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?