Tisme
Apathetic at Best
- Joined
- 27 August 2014
- Posts
- 8,954
- Reactions
- 1,152
Yes weed does have many issues, but it is possible the people who ended up with an addiction always had an underlying issue. If weed did not exist they would medicate with something else..
I have been around many heavy drug users of hard drugs and through FB have some idea how most of end up years later. Only in my 30s but I have not seen a single one commit suicide. Not saying drugs are good, I am saying that I think your experience of cutting so many mates is extreme.
.
Right now weed is in the hands of the people. Those that want it can get it. Its not available to a lot of the weak minded.Yes weed does have many issues, but it is possible the people who ended up with an addiction always had an underlying issue. If weed did not exist they would medicate with something else.
I have been around many heavy drug users of hard drugs and through FB have some idea how most of end up years later. Only in my 30s but I have not seen a single one commit suicide. Not saying drugs are good, I am saying that I think your experience of cutting so many mates is extreme.
My point is much like others, yes drugs are bad. They do have devastating impacts on society. But the war drugs has been an abject failure so lets try a new approach. If that does not work lets try something else? I think we will up end finding it is case of, what is the least worst approach? as it is the human condition that drugs will always ruin a portion of the population.
Starring Tisme....
Didn’t I read somewhere that you weren’t a crusader or is my mind fading due to substance abuse?
So you’ve gone from not a crusader even though your sons friends episodes?
You might pick up a scent around pot smokers and I pick up a scent around people like you...
Bull....
Right now weed is in the hands of the people. Those that want it can get it. Its not available to a lot of the weak minded.
Once the govt and corporations get a hold of it, then it all changes.
Think of the early days of alcohol and cigarettes. We already have the propaganda of weed being a miracle cure all. Its big business, and a rush for stronger strains that are always available.
And yes, some people have addictive tendencies. Thats the problem. They cost society, family and the health system. They are the ones you target to turn a profit.
Alcohol is a problem for society.
Tobacco is a problem for society. It's only just now we are getting a handle on it after billions spent.
Not sure that adding weed is a great idea.
My point is much like others, yes drugs are bad. They do have devastating impacts on society. But the war drugs has been an abject failure so lets try a new approach. If that does not work lets try something else? I think we will up end finding it is case of, what is the least worst approach? as it is the human condition that drugs will always ruin a portion of the population.
Yes it has. Plenty of young women still taking it up. We basically had to make it as close to illegal while still managing to get a tax revenue.I think cigarette smoking in young people has declined in what I’ve seen.
Regulation and education seems to be working don’t you think?
I do remember some young people jumping off buildings high on SYNTHETICS
Which come about through the illegality of marijuana
Did you not hear about Kronic?
What I see is someone who cherry picks the internet,personalises it and uses it to forward their agenda
Sound familiar
As soon as you resort to vulgar personal insults you have declared your status and inability to communicate effectively
You've been back peddling ever since you realised your early posts in this thread, trying to use e.g. me as a stooge, were tantamount to promotion of drug dependency and narcobots.
I accept people can use things safely. But not all people can. And once things are legal, we expose more people to the dangers.
I am not debating if drugs are harmful or not. The only debate I am trying to have is if prohibition reduces consumption vs legalising and spending the money saved on law enforcement and prisons on social services for drug abusers.
We both have the same goal of reducing the number of people who abuse drugs.
I am not debating if drugs are harmful or not. The only debate I am trying to have is if prohibition reduces consumption vs legalising and spending the money saved on law enforcement and prisons on social services for drug abusers.
We both have the same goal of reducing the number of people who abuse drugs.
I'm not sure social services work that well. Generational education probably works better, as with tobacco. You look at alcohol and I'm not sure it works that well, drink driving etc. Even with AA people have a life long battle. Rehab fails a lot. Is keeping the majority away from it safer in the long run?
I'm honestly not up to scratch on all the stats and would have to review. Its twenty years down the track when we have a problem with most substances as the health issues become known.
Consumption has gone through the roof in the US and recruits has to. Of course the weed heads have been running around trying to debunk the facts.
I'm sure you guys will too
When people start dying on roads because of an unnecessary state sanctioned drug, we'll all just have to satisfy ourselves that alcohol is worse, US blacks were once slaves, so we aren't responsible.
http://www.dontdecriminalize.org/wp.../RockyMountHIghColoradoCannabisReport2017.pdf
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?