- Joined
- 10 July 2004
- Posts
- 2,913
- Reactions
- 3
Despite "speculation" being blamed for oil prices going higher week after week there are some key facts that the smart investors are locked into.I agree smurf.
From a TA perspective there are some gaps to be filled back to about $80 and there is a good prospect of an evening star forming on the weekly chart.
Fundamentally, I reckon when the US congress gets back to work next week, probably about Wednesday sounds like a good time for the POO to start it's exponentional decline back to about 80. By then there should be more news of further regulation of oil speculation.
I have a theory.
The mega hedge funds are using the POO to capitalise on the subprime confidence drop to drive down the stock markets a bit extra.
They will be wanting to short step the suckers buying into oil contracts by getting out early and back into stocks before most people wake up to what's happening.
Sorry Jess. but I think you might just get pipped before the post with your bet.
PS: Fwiw I think the really smart investers have already started retreating. I've noticed the price of Rhodium, the ultimate precious metal, came off the boil a few days ago. The POG is just hanging up because of the POO.
Saudi Arabia's ability to calm panicky oil markets has been waning for years. With oil prices doubling since last summer, to more than $140 a barrel, Saudi King Abdullah on June 22 convened an extraordinary meeting (BusinessWeek.com, 6/22/08) of OPEC members, international oil industry CEOs, and foreign leaders in an effort to calm the markets. The kingdom's message was clear: Saudi fields can pump oil to market quickly, if demand warrants.
However, it appears that for at least the next five years, and possibly longer, the Saudis are likely to produce less crude than promised, according to fresh data on the kingdom's oil fields obtained July 9 by BusinessWeek. Saudi officials have said they would increase production to 12.5 million barrels a day next year, from the current 9.5 million barrels a day, and could even ramp up to as much as 15 million barrels a day if the market demanded it. As proof to a skeptical audience, the normally highly secretive Saudis were a bit more more open, escorting journalists on a visit to their new Al Khurais field (BusinessWeek.com, 6/23/08), east of Riyadh, and disclosing some field data.
Oil companies want in
But the detailed document, obtained from a person with access to Saudi oil officials, suggests that Saudi Aramco will be limited to sustained production of just 12 million barrels a day in 2010, and will be able to maintain that volume only for short, temporary periods such as emergencies. Then it will scale back to a sustainable production level of about 10.4 million barrels a day, according to the data. BusinessWeek obtained a field-by-field breakdown of estimated Saudi oil production from 2009 through 2013. It was provided by an oil industry executive who said he had confirmed it with a ranking Saudi energy official who has access to the field data. The executive, who has proven reliable over several years of reporting interaction, provided the data on condition of anonymity to protect his access to the kingdom and the identity of the inside contact who confirmed the information.
Saudi Aramco officials in the kingdom could not be reached for comment on July 9.
Three industry analysts in the U.S. said the document's overall conclusion””that the Saudis cannot sustain higher than 12 million barrels a day maximum production for the next few years””appeared to be reasonable. "My view is that when they finish their expansion program they are unlikely to be above 12" million barrels per day, says Roger Diwan, a Middle East energy expert with PFC Energy, a consultancy in Washington, D.C. Lawrence Goldstein, an analyst with the Energy Policy Research Foundation, an industry-funded research group, said that uncertainty about Saudi production remains a problem for the market. "The only ones who know could be the Saudis," Goldstein says, "and they might not know because they haven't tested the deliverability system in as much as a decade."
A principal reason for the dramatic surge in world oil prices has been a tight balance of global supply and demand, combined with a lack of spare capacity to produce more crude in a pinch. So that what previously might be considered a barely consequential guerrilla attack in oil-rich Nigeria, or an empty Iranian threat to close the strategic Strait of Hormuz, results in a far more dramatic oil market reaction than ever before.
Once again Saudi Arabia has emerged as the central energy player, the only oil producer on the planet seen as having the spare capacity to rapidly boost crude exports. The kingdom also has close ties to the West, and until 1980 the precursors of Exxon (XOM), Chevron (CVX), and Mobil were partners with the Saudi state oil company. Now most of the major oil giants are hoping to get back in, and one way they have suggested is by helping the Saudis maintain the fields, an overture that has been rejected.
"A Bunch of Empty Boasts"
On oil matters, the kingdom's credibility has been clouded by intense secrecy. The Saudis, for instance, refuse, unlike Russia, Venezuela, and Norway, to release detailed assessments of their oil reserves, which has made many skeptical. "They are just a bunch of empty boasts," Matthew Simmons, chairman of Houston investment bank Simmons & Co. International, says of the kingdom's recent promises of 12.5 million barrels a day. He is also skeptical of Saudi reserve estimates.
One dramatic part of the data concerns a site called Ghawar, which has been the kingdom's workhorse field for decades. It shows the field producing 5.4 million barrels a day next year, but the volume then falling off rapidly, to 4.475 million daily barrels in 2013. "That's why Khurais is so important””to make up for that decrease," said the oil industry executive who released the data. He was referring to a supergiant field that is to come online later this year and produce an estimated 500,000 barrels a day of crude. In last month's gathering in Saudi Arabia, officials of the kingdom told journalists that Ghawar had produced just under 5 million barrels a day from 1993 through 2007.
Mainly the data show flat production; apart from the addition of Khurais and a heavy oil field called Manifa, no increases appear in any of the fields during the next five years. Production at Manifa is to begin in 2011 with 125,000 barrels a day, according to the data, and rise rapidly to 900,000 barrels a day two years later. Though 2014 is not included in the data, one of the fields listed””Shaybah””is to have a volume increase to 1 million barrels a day that year, from 750,000 barrels a day from 2009 to 2013, according to the oil executive.
Still, despite its enormous reserves and bullish statements, Saudi Arabia appears likely to fall well short of the daily production it has targeted in the near term.
LeVine is a correspondent in BusinessWeek's Washington bureau.
Crude Oil Jumps More Than $5 as Trading Programs Trigger Buying
By Mark Shenk
July 10 (Bloomberg) -- Crude oil rose more than $5 a barrel in the last hour of New York floor trading as prices breached a level that triggered computer-generated buying programs.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20602013&sid=aiico.empSD0&refer=commodity_futures
Good grief! Any other day you are likely to get the same rise of $5 being touted by the media as being triggered by "speculators".So, the truth is out. All these "speculators" are in fact mindless COMPUTERS set to AUTO-PILOT!!!! Hahahaha!
Here is a wicked analogy - how many airliners have crashed in turbulent weather while under the command of dumb auto-pilots? Hmmmm. Maybe new laws should be drafted to ban auto stock trading buy/stops!?? LOL
MAN YOUR PC'S!! STOP THE ROT!!!
:hide:
AJ
I think their black boxes are short the odd covariation.So the smart investors are .... chip orientated black box programs .
If they have that information then they'd also know who the trading houses behind it all are as well .
So why are they paying mega dollars to the boards and executives when all they need is a progammer and a computer ?
Crikey how many times has that gone through the old whirlpool before it got squeezed through the wringer ?
A couple of days on the line should dry that one up .
It would have been easier to blame it on Jeff Kennett ..............
I think their black boxes are short the odd covariation.
Is it true that Interpol are investigating their numerical "polarities" as an exigency measure, given the forecast integers bifurcated tangentially from normative fractals?
Meanwhile, in the world of fundamental analysis the US retains its crown for gluttony amongst oil consumers. Not only cannot it get enough, it can't keep it long enough when it does, and thinks nothing of paying through the nose because it can.
Despite US consumption declining, oil product inventories fell markedly during the previous week and mostly sit at the bottom of average ranges. Needless to say, the smarter analysts have worked out that if demand is falling and stocks are falling, the price will keep rising.
US inventory reports don't and won't tell you "why" things are so bad. For example, they don't tell you that Canada (the major supplier to USA - greater than Saudi Arabia by a million barrels of product per day) will increasingly become an internal user of its oil output, and that the US should not rely on this market too far into the future. Or that Mexico, which supplies the US with 1.2m barrels per day, will not be capable of supplying any within 5 years.
It's taken a while, but the funds have worked out that fundamentals rule.... and they are going long. So long in fact that the present bull run in oil has not succumbed: It's having another crack at a record close tonight and likely will rise well over $150 before a major retrace befalls it.
In the meantime geopolitical jitters simply underpin the capacity of oil to catch out anyone trying to short it to bejeebers. To the extent that previous posters predicting tops or significant retraces are conspicuous by their absence!
Petrol may hit $8 in a decade: CSIRO
Print Email
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Broadcast: 11/07/2008
Reporter: Karl Hoerr
The CSIRO have forecast petrol could hit $8 a litre within the next decade, based on the assumption that world oil production will peak in about five years. Researchers say that will have a much greater effect on petrol prices than any emissions trading scheme.
Transcript
VIRGINIA TRIOLI, PRESENTER: If current petrol prices aren't bad enough, there's now a prediction they could hit $8 a litre within a decade.
The CSIRO forecast is based on the assumption that world oil production will peak in about five years and the researchers say that will have a much greater effect on petrol prices than any emissions trading scheme.
Karl Hoerr reports.
KARL HOERR, REPORTER: It's a dire prediction, but one expert fears it could become a reality.
BRUCE HARRISON, BIOFEULS ASSOCIATION: We're on that plateau and very close to peak oil production which means we've got to find
some alternative supplies of fuel.
KARL HOERR: Peak oil means annual production has reached its maximum level, and that could mean an $8 a litre petrol price, which could lift
the average weekly fuel bill to $220.
MOTORIST: Ridiculous. Really ridiculous; like, what are you going to do?
KARL HOERR: But the "Fuel for Thought" report says the price hike could yield some benefits, increasing the use of biofuels, LPG and hybrid
technology.
JOHN WRIGHT, CSIRO: There's a huge economic incentive to produce alternative fuels once the price starts to really climb in oil.
MARK REUSS, CHAIRMAN, GM HOLDEN: We have to lead in the industry with equipment that unleverages our foreign oil dependency.
KARL HOERR: And as debate rages over emissions trading, the report says pricing carbon at $40 a tonne would only add 10 cents a litre at
the bowser.
JOHN WRIGHT: While they're an imposition and they do increase the price of petrol, it's really relatively small compared to the movements of
oil price itself.
KARL HOERR: While $8 a litre is a worst case scenario, drivers say prices anywhere near that high would force them to find alternative transport.
MOTORIST II: Coming into the city every day, you'd have to catch the train then, wouldn't you?
MOTORIST III: Take transport. No way, transport for sure.
KARL HOERR: What's less clear than the trend of rising petrol prices is whether public transport systems are ready for more commuters.
We are already at a price point precipiting some demand destruction.Hi Red, do you think $1000 bbl oil is possible?
thx
MS
I think their black boxes are short the odd covariation.
Is it true that Interpol are investigating their numerical "polarities" as an exigency measure, given the forecast integers bifurcated tangentially from normative fractals?
lol, that is one MOTHER of an impulse wave 5 Whiskers!
Not much comparison to it's usually similar brother wave 1........
Oh, I see you have taken away that bottom chart on Brent.
But yeah, I recall Wavepicker using the term 'blowoff top' to describe the oil chart.
That's what those speculators did to wave 5.:
Oil approaching some support now, will be interesting to see if it gains some traction and some buying volume comes in.
What a market eh! Sidelines sound good to me at the moment. I'm sure a few of the highly leveraged would have seen some margin calls come in over the last few days! Maybe a few more hedge funds to role............? Anyways off topic. Back to oil.
Did anyone happen to notice Natural Gas?
Please make a big noise so that energy suppliers notice before northern hemisphere winter.
Went higher than any point I was prepared to trade it at.Yep, I got a profit out of the run but got out too early. Was playing discretionary so it was impossible to identify the top. That was the reason why I didn't bother going shorting it because I didn't know when it will turn. (nor do I have a mechanical system to take advantage of this, yet...)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?