So when they do succeed, you will be calling the family to tell them it's ok and not to fret because not all Muslims bad guys only a few and we should learn to accept that?
Bad apples in a bag of apples will contaminate the good apples. If you can't separate out the two you throw the bag & contents away, but most people just throw out the lot just incase.
I still don't trust Catholic Irishmen won't blow some family up in Australia, let alone a bunch of highly susceptible to religious suggestion people who parade their distinction in uniform as a snub and offence to us worthless Kafirs.
Thats why we have vetting of refugees and immigrants.
"Thats doesn't stop all potential threats" you will probably say, and no it doesn't but neither do RBT's and Taxes.
Rectifying typo error.I can sees a few mosques being own up by the Aussie civilian army.....
Unfortunately that's not good enough. A lot of proven terrorists have been born here, but still carry the disease of indoctrination. Continuing Muslim immigration is like letting a lot of typhoid Marys into the country. You never know who they will infect, or if they will contract the disease themselves.
[/QUOTE]Rectifying typo error.
I can sees a few mosques being blown up by the Aussie civilian army.....
Most people that kill due to alcohol violence and drink driving are born here, but carry the disease of indoctrination into alcohol culture from European heritage, continuing European immigration from drinking cultures is like letting a lot of Typhoid Marys into the country, you never know who they will infect.
And is that a good thing?
You don't solve one problem by diverting to another problem. Both Islam and drink driving can be tackled at the same time.
Let me rephrase,
Do you consider the blowing up of mosques a good thing?
Yes, but your answer to one is to target the offenders, and the answer to the other is to attack the rights of thousands of innocent people.
Which is silly considering the over reaction is to the smaller threat.
Let me rephrase,
Do you consider the blowing up of mosques a good thing?
Yes, but your answer to one is to target the offenders, and the answer to the other is to attack the rights of thousands of innocent people.
Which is silly considering the over reaction is to the smaller threat.
Yes, but your answer to one is to target the offenders, and the answer to the other is to attack the rights of thousands of innocent people.
Yes, but your answer to one is to target the offenders, and the answer to the other is to attack the rights of thousands of innocent people.
.
. It's like letting someone into your own house, YOU have the choice to let them in or not.
No I think you have it wrong there. People have no "rights" to migrate to this country unless we say they can. It's like letting someone into your own house, YOU have the choice to let them in or not.
That shouldn't be too unfamiliar to your, even at your young age. We have all had our previous rights eroded by successive govts because of the actions of the few .
Exactly my point, we should resist any loss of freedom unless it translates to a very big benefit.
These anti muslim laws would not be good value, the loss of freedoms and benefits would be, but the benefit would be basically nil.
So we can not refuse refugees
28 last year too wasn't it? At least you could say it's going in the 'right' direction....My apologies to the Japanese. They actually accepted 27 refugees in 2015 and rejected 99% of applications.
https://www.japantoday.com/category...refugees-last-year-rejects-99-of-applications
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?