- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,100
- Reactions
- 12,707
When's the last time those country invaded any other country?
The 'he was a Christian' tag is complete b.s.
If they practice the religion, no matter what branch, they are Muslim. To say they are not real Muslims is a lie.
If you are a Muslim, you would know the Koran backwards......If you are a Muslim you believe in Sharia law.
I haven't heard of any cases in Australia of Christians burning alleged "witches".
In that case they are not Muslims.So by that definition, there aren't many Muslims at all, because just like the bible, most Muslims don't read the qu'ran, and a lot of them don't believe in sharia law.
I haven't heard of any cases of Muslims beheading people in Australia either, but you still use that against them.
I haven't heard of any cases of Muslims beheading people in Australia either, but you still use that against them.
I haven't heard of any cases of Muslims beheading people in Australia either, but you still use that against them.
In that case they are not Muslims.
Not yet, but it will happen sooner or later....It really does not matter whether they kill by beheading, car bombing, suicide bombers or being mowed down by a car
What about Curtis Cheng, killed by a Muslim outside Parramatta police station, Lindt Cafe , Muslim man attacks policemen with knife.
Off duty soldier beheaded by Muslims in Britain ?
Don't you watch the news ?
You haven't been following the news lately where the coppers thwarted a planned beheading?
Good so our intelligence agencies are doing their job, I can't see how this means we should ban all muslims.
So when they do succeed, you will be calling the family to tell them it's ok and not to fret because not all Muslims bad guys only a few and we should learn to accept that?
As long as you ae going to call all the victims of alcohol violence and drink driving and tell them not to fret because not all drinkers are bad guys only a few and we should learn to accept that?
-------
What you have to revise is that my argument is that islamic violence among those we have allowed in is so rare, that I don't think we should mistreat all muslims, thats all I am saying, I can't see why you think mistreating all muslims will some how lower our risk any further than it already is, I mean its co low that it is almost non existent.
No one must. Those filthy priests were covered up by their own in that other untrustworthy religion.Whatever happened to presumed innocent?
Why must anyone, from any group, must somehow prove themselves that they're against terrorists? We have to ask if they're for it or not? They have to go out of their way to prove that if they see anything, they'll definitely call?
But alcoholics don't kneel down to the god Bacchus/Dionysus and proudly commit atrocities in his name.
So what? they do more damage to Australian society than terrorists at present
That can be reduced by increasing alcohol taxes resulting in less drinking or putting RBT's outside pubs and clubs.
Terrorism can be reduced by letting in less potential terrorists.
Thats why we have vetting of refugees and immigrants.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?