Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Fake news and its effect on the community

Complaints about one side accusing the other only ever getting coverage.

There is a problem with this line of thinking........which side of politics currently are in power through out the western world.....eh?

Next question how is it we are seeing the greatest transfer of wealth ever in the modern era......eh?

That's before we get to the biggest unfunded tax handouts to wealthy / corporations creating one of the greatest government budget debts seen in the US and likely coming to AU.

Then there is the reductions of workers rights and conditions, containment of wages (read about Amazon workers).....slave labour.......slave labour oh yeah de-regulation gig economy anyone FFS

Lets try the Australian version everyone's mate, baseball cap wearing fossil uses attack laws to go after workers reps while Banks rip off people blind for billions, yep really unfair to criticise our best mate FFS.

Defending Trump.....really? Thats right its OK because Hillary would have been worse, god help us.

Nice bubble, FYJIAOR, medication what ever it is.

Then we get to the the quite people.........is that what you want?
...and I need not say anything else :rolleyes:
 
When you give a fanatic a link to a text by a real climate believer stating the obvious exageration and fake facts being promoted, and the damage this does to the cause
He points first that this guy is pro nuclear..as basically that's it, no point arguing facts
He is white, old, gay, whatever so the fact stated do not count
@IFocus you want to maintain a less rabid position, why no answer on that one?
Still this anything for the cause?
Is that the moral position of the saviours of the world
Could that guy be too rich or not leftist enough or not black enough to state any truth
It will really hurt you hard if you have any conscience in a couple of decades when you will have to admit to the damage you did to both your country..ohh sorry no such name....and the world
 
When you give a fanatic a link to a text by a real climate believer stating the obvious exageration and fake facts being promoted, and the damage this does to the cause
Bas made some good points, but you do what you always do, and indulge in spurious rants because never have you been able to understand climate science.
Fake news is about perpetuating untruths, and that's what you do best.
Bas does put huge amounts of into into threads - not my style - and the majority is directly linked to prevailing scientific findings.
Try shooting down the message if you believe your understanding is at odds with what is posted and make a positive contribution to threads for a change.
 
Last edited:
The issue confronting you is to do better, yet you cannot, but happily spread falsehoods.
The issue confronting me is fanatics who cannot step off their virtue signaling on any center/right bashing ways. Parading truth with fiction affects both ends of the spectrum. But it seems to be a leftist specialty. Perhaps its some kind of delusional ailment where you skip past reason and head straight to crazyville.

You guys have no problem head nodding on issues completely devoid of evidence as if its an open and shut case.
Truly worrying development in the world.
 
The issue confronting me is fanatics who cannot step off their virtue signaling on any center/right bashing ways. Parading truth with fiction affects both ends of the spectrum. But it seems to be a leftist specialty. Perhaps its some kind of delusional ailment where you skip past reason and head straight to crazyville.

You guys have no problem head nodding on issues completely devoid of evidence as if its an open and shut case.
Truly worrying development in the world.
In another thread I saw how you contorted your ideas about Greta Thunberg's media machine into so many knots you choked yourself to death.
Telltale signs of incompetence in presenting a case are quickly found when a range of tactics and terms are used instead of facts, and you are good at ticking those boxes.
Aside from failing to address what is at issue, you use phrases like "virtue signalling" and invoke political leanings.
When we show your ideas to be poorly founded you re-present them, as if wanting to be punished again for your your ignorance.
It gets a bit tedious at ASF and folk like @Smurf1976 have stepped away from much of the shenanigans for good reason.
 
In another thread I saw how you contorted your ideas about Greta Thunberg's media machine into so many knots you choked yourself to death.
Telltale signs of incompetence in presenting a case are quickly found when a range of tactics and terms are used instead of facts, and you are good at ticking those boxes.
Aside from failing to address what is at issue, you use phrases like "virtue signalling" and invoke political leanings.
When we show your ideas to be poorly founded you re-present them, as if wanting to be punished again for your your ignorance.
It gets a bit tedious at ASF and folk like @Smurf1976 have stepped away from much of the shenanigans for good reason.
Actually I was to lazy to continue the discussion. 90% of the time you spin as you go. Such as Chaplins leanings or the law surrounding the folau case. Greta was another one, I just couldn't be bothered continuing. Trying to thesaurus your way out of an argument gets old quick.
 
Actually I was to lazy to continue the discussion. 90% of the time you spin as you go. Such as Chaplins leanings or the law surrounding the folau case. Greta was another one, I just couldn't be bothered continuing. Trying to thesaurus your way out of an argument gets old quick.
You posted copiously and in the case of Thunberg never showed what you said was credible, so nice try but truly delusional - go back and read those those threads.
 
You posted copiously and in the case of Thunberg never showed what you said was credible, so nice try but truly delusional - go back and read those those threads.
Wow!

I am uncertain as to what it was that moxjo posted attracting such criticism!

It must have been pretty wild!

Especially considering that my postings of articles, suggesting the possibility of messianic time travellers, have yet to draw so much as a single derisive comment!
 
You posted copiously and in the case of Thunberg never showed what you said was credible, so nice try but truly delusional - go back and read those those threads.
Hardly, Greta was a manufactured product that failed. If anything large emitting countries moved further away from doing anything. Everything I said was backed up. You basically dribbled spin, backed up by your delusion that your posts are somehow automatically fact checked and passed.
 
Wow!

I am uncertain as to what it was that moxjo posted attracting such criticism!

It must have been pretty wild!

Especially considering that my postings of articles, suggesting the possibility of messianic time travellers, have yet to draw so much as a single derisive comment!
We just like to argue. 25 years of marriage together will do that.
 
Your claim is evidenced by what, exactly?
The guy that did the al gore course, wanted to be just like him and promoted the sht out of her. Eventually got the arse but he kicked the ball rolling.
Or you could actually look for yourself for once. Pretty sure I already linked everything.
 
The guy that did the al gore course, wanted to be just like him and promoted the sht out of her. Eventually got the arse but he kicked the ball rolling.
Or you could actually look for yourself for once. Pretty sure I already linked everything.
As usual, a vacuous claim with nothing to support it except for your own assertions!
 
Top