Craton
Mostly passive, contrarian.
- Joined
- 6 February 2013
- Posts
- 1,760
- Reactions
- 2,535
Why would the USA start shooting (and just) at Russian aircraft?If the USA start using missiles to shoot down Russian aircraft, could Putin call this an act of aggression and a declaration of war, and use nuclear weapons against US bases in Europe?
Wikipedia:Putin won't hesitate to use nuclear weapons against Europe or any other country for that matter if they confront/strike Russia directly - I don't condone the use of nuclear weapons or any conflict/war for that matter. War is not the solution.
------------
The US detonated two nuclear weapons over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6th & 9th August 1945, respectively. The two bombings killed between 129,000 and 226,000 people, most of whom were civilians, and remain the only use of nuclear weapons in armed conflict.
Was the US ever taken to the human rights/international tribunal to answer for these atrocities ? curious to know as I've never really taken much interest in history & war's as such
Note those two very important words, "unconditional surrender".On July 26, 1945, the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Republic of China issued a Potsdam Declaration that called for the unconditional surrender of Japan. It stated that if Japan did not surrender, it would face "prompt and utter destruction".[29][30] The Japanese government ignored this ultimatum, sending a message that they were not going to surrender. In response to the rejection, President Truman authorized the dropping of the atomic bombs.
There are smarter ways than the one you are emphasising.Why would the USA start shooting (and just) at Russian aircraft?
Putin doesn't need that to happen to declare war, he already has. History will recall the Hitler called his 1939-40 invasions, "special military operations" and look what that led to.
So, what would happen if Putin started sending nukes into any base in Europe, will WW3 erupt?
It's all stops out to avoid that but if, if, Putin does then it could very well be the trigger that ignites the powder keg of tensions that seem to be so pervasive around the world at present.
Europe, Indo-China, Taiwan, South China Sea et al.
The question one needs to ask is, do the powers that be have an appetite for all the consequences of a nuclear war?
What am I emphasizing?There are smarter ways than the one you are emphasising
What am I emphasizing?
You asked, I gave a reply. Unlike your throw away one liners. Of course there are smarter ways than tossing nukes around...
What am I emphasizing?
You asked, I gave a reply. Unlike your throw away one liners. Of course there are smarter ways than tossing nukes around...
I honestly don't know enough about Russia/Ukraine/NATO history to argue strongly any way but I do feel from what little I know that if euro stopped encroaching on Russia thru Ukraine then there would be no war currently in Ukraine....and why the encroachment? Because oil, commodities and resources.
Appreciate your thoughts on this take.
Broadly, in modern times since WWII there was the Cold War and the so-called Iron Curtain between the then, communist USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) and the West. Ukraine (like so many other countries) was part of the USSR. Putin is ex KGB and from that old USSR too.I honestly don't know enough about Russia/Ukraine/NATO history to argue strongly any way but I do feel from what little I know that if euro stopped encroaching on Russia thru Ukraine then there would be no war currently in Ukraine....and why the encroachment? Because oil, commodities and resources.
Appreciate your thoughts on this take.
NATO constitutes a system of collective security, whereby its independent member states agree to mutual defense in response to an attack by any external party. It was established during the Cold War in response to the threat posed by the Soviet Union. The alliance has remained in place since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and has been involved in military operations in the Balkans, the Middle East, South Asia, and Africa.
That's all well and good but NATO was not to move one inch into Ukraine but clearly euro has encroached. The only logical reason is presumably the same old story: access to oil, commodities, resources.Broadly, in modern times since WWII there was the Cold War and the so-called Iron Curtain between the then, communist USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) and the West. Ukraine (like so many other countries) was part of the USSR. Putin is ex KGB and from that old USSR too.
With the advent of Perestroika and glasnost within the USSR in the 80's culminating in the collapse of the USSR/Iron Curtain in 1991, allowed former countries swallowed up into the USSR like Poland, Hungary, Lativa, Estonia, Ukraine and many more etc to break from Soviet Russian rule and regain sovereignty.
Glasnost or "openness" was seen as a sign that Russia moving towards a more accessible and West friendly regime. The threat of nuclear war seemed over and the world breathed a collective sigh of relief.
There is more to it than that of course with Crimea playing a part e.g. being transferred to Ukraine SSR in 1954.
Anyway, it's not about the West encroaching on Russia, it's quite the opposite thanks to Putin's ideology. Besides that, NATO is not pushing to have Ukraine join, in fact there are strict conditions that must be met before Ukraine, or any country, can become a member. Putin has done everything in his power, thanks to his Crimea invasion back in 2014, to successfully stop Ukraine from being accepted into NATO.
The threat is not from the West, it's from the East!
NATO:
@3 hound, I'm not going to quote and respond to your post per se, I'll say this though.
No doubt there are pro-Russian supporters just like there's anti-vaxxers here, they are all very vocal and some, really know how to stretch the truth.
Facts are that Putin has been closing up Russia for his own cronyism ever since he became president and the West isn't the one threatening the use of nukes.
Here, you are lawfully free to believe and do what you will, seems to me that is far better than what Putin's Russia is offering Ukraine.
Just an observation to some; It's Aussie Shares Forum not Aussie Shrills Forum.
You
You are pretty sure of yourself that you have the correct take on things.
No offence but I am always dubious about people that are convinced they have the correct take on deeply complex geo-political issues.
How you wound ant-vax in there is impressive.
I just know there are a lot of Aussies that a month ago didn't know Ukraine from from their butthole but it hits the news and viola, they are instant experts.
Why, because I ask the question that intelligent people know to be an issue, while the trigger happy few spout delusions of sending in the calvary with no consequences?
Hi hound, interesting to see you in a new profile.
Hypocrite, your whole post was a scatter gun ad hominem attack.Thanks @Dona Ferentes . I have tried to keep my wellies clean and not covered in sh*t by not wading in to @3 hound and @JohnDe 's pointed lectures to us all on geopolitical matters. They sound like quite the virtuosos with a less than sesquipedalian scattergun approach to debate.
The existing members of ASF have learnt much from those who have migrated from the Commsec forum, which I have been told died because of ad hominem attacks by posters. ( attacking the person not the ball ).
As Ricky Gervais would say, nobody gives a rats what anyone on this thread thinks about Ukraine and Putin's fascist, hegemenous attack on that country. We are all just here because we enjoy the conversation and learning from others about a faraway country being pillaged by an aggressive empire. And we have opinions. Now it is within a person's rights to disagree with my views and I am sure some of the transgressors against couth on this thread will be busily checking my posts to fling some faeces in my direction, but hey, that's their right, but it is poor ASF decorum, of which even I have at times been guilty.
gg
As Corporal Jones in Dad's Army famously said.Hypocrite, your whole post was a scatter gun ad hominem attack.
Thanks @Dona Ferentes . I have tried to keep my wellies clean and not covered in sh*t by not wading in to @3 hound and @JohnDe 's pointed lectures to us all on geopolitical matters. They sound like quite the virtuosos with a less than sesquipedalian scattergun approach to debate.
The existing members of ASF have learnt much from those who have migrated from the Commsec forum, which I have been told died because of ad hominem attacks by posters. ( attacking the person not the ball ).
As Ricky Gervais would say, nobody gives a rats what anyone on this thread thinks about Ukraine and Putin's fascist, hegemenous attack on that country. We are all just here because we enjoy the conversation and learning from others about a faraway country being pillaged by an aggressive empire. And we have opinions. Now it is within a person's rights to disagree with my views and I am sure some of the transgressors against couth on this thread will be busily checking my posts to fling some faeces in my direction, but hey, that's their right, but it is poor ASF decorum, of which even I have at times been guilty.
gg
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?