wayneL said:So you are quite prepared to accept the Israeli propaganda without question?
visual said:No,the question is ,why are you prepared to accept the terrorist propoganda,so easily?
They were exposed using photogenic dead children for sympathy!The series of photos does`nt lie,and at the end of the photo shoot the leader of this mob on this particular occasion went home,to be interviewed by a french reporter all this is on the record.
Sure there two sides to every story,but the photos clearly shows him choosing dead children to use for the photo that he knew would break our hearts,the dead children were there ,he was in various poses that then we saw in our papers,representing himself as either the father or a family member.
Maybe like the ambulance that was hit by a missile but miracularly did`nt explode into smithereens we were`nt supposed to see this ,but we did .
wayneL said:So you are quite prepared to accept the Israeli propaganda without question?
Why is it unacceptable for Lebanon to recieve armaments from Syria/Iran, yet it is quite OK for Israel to accept substantially more and more lethal armaments from the US?
Does that not seem biased?
wayneL said:I don't accept any propaganda whether hezbollah or Israeli or US or Oz. Hezbollah was caught out. Shame on them. I'm not here to defend Hezbollah.
It does not remove the fact that Israel blew the crap out of Lebanon... not just Hezbollah... they attacked the WHOLE country, north to south east to west... with US made missiles from US made warplanes.
I'm questioning the Israeli actions.
Do you think the response was proportional? The international community, in general, does not think so.
visual said:Wayne are you comparing iran and syria with America?
A place that requires 4 male witnesses to a rape or the woman gets stoned?
So exactly what type of human right were you expecting again?
Time for bed I think.Obviously this has been a waste of time,but I could`nt sleep anyway.
visual said:I see you spent oh what not even a heart beat being horrified by their behaviour,got caught out you say,oh then thats all right ,carry on
wayneL said:I'm sure the Native Americans or African Americans (to be ever so PC) would love to discuss such issues with you. I will abstain.
wayneL said:Don't you dare interpret my views in such a manner. Thats very disingenuous.
I am horrified by any innocent life destroyed, Lebanese, Israeli, Iraqi American Australian... anyone.
visual said:Wayne ,now you are being churlish,abstain all you like,I`m sure the African Americans or the Indians will be happy,
You hate America but rely on their system to earn a crust,surely you are supporting a society you despise,well until they get it right,that is, perhaps you should show you disgust by boycotting their markets,but then it will cost you money,and a way of making money that you understand and learning another market or relying on a much smaller market would be a pain ,right?
So it`s all about money,with you as well.
Good night.
visual said:You have spent hours on this thread,but those photos just got,an oh they got caught out!and then you carried on with your hate of America.Disingenious not me mate,been there,Wayne,I even have the scars to prove it,discuss honestly don`t try and reeducate me.I`ve had enough education to last me a life time and more.
wayneL said:I am conflicted on that point, I must admit.
But to be clear.
I am disgusted by the US governent.
wayneL said:Don't you dare interpret my views in such a manner. Thats very disingenuous.
visual said:Wayne on post 90 and 91 you make some immature comments.
But here looks like I got under your skin,afraid that what I said is right.
A person who admires Americans even some of them,would`nt betray them or their past sacrifices ,sacrifices that now allow you to lead a life that you clearly don`t appreciate.
Wayne you`ll now be on my ignore list.Have a good life.
wayneL said:Visual,
Your argument style lacks logic. You cannot claim points you clearly have not scored. You allow anger to take over from rational thought. You did not get under my skin. You made claims about my character and I called you on it. Here you have done it again. I take particular exception to the above comment.
Are you incapable of debating the points? This is obvious as you have gone ad hominem.
Making scurilous claims you cannot know are true is contemptable. Please withdraw your comment above and debate me on the issues if you are capable.
wayneL said:It does not remove the fact that Israel blew the crap out of Lebanon... not just Hezbollah... they attacked the WHOLE country, north to south east to west... with US made missiles from US made warplanes.
I'm questioning the Israeli actions.
Do you think the response was proportional? The international community, in general, does not think so.
rub92me said:I knew this one was going to end in tears. But imo Wayne in this particular thread you haven't been shying away from the odd 'ad hominems' either, calling people's arguments and opinions disingeneous, etc. Just my
That the truth is not always easy to discern must be better appreciated by Mr Downer following his embrace of the Lebanese ambulance incident, as presented by internet site http://www.zombietime.com. In his speech to PANPA, Mr Downer said the incident, in which it was claimed Israel had deliberately bombed a Red Cross ambulance, did not stand up to even the most rudimentary scrutiny. Mr Downer said that after closer study of the images of the damage to the ambulance, it was beyond serious dispute that this episode has all the makings of a hoax. His source? A pro-Israel website that specialises in posting pictures of student protests, naked bicycle riders and historic pictures of the prophet Mohammed. In a lengthy posting, the website puts forward its own conspiracy theory and claims the incident never took place.
This newspaper (The Australian) was aware of the website claims but, rather than accept them at face value, dispatched reporter Martin Chulov to review the evidence and reinterview those involved. In his report in the Media section today, Chulov stands by the original account and says damage to the ambulance is consistent with the original claims of attack. We have done what a good newspaper should, done the leg work and reported the facts. Mr Downer may himself have fallen for the propaganda trick he is keen to warn against.
...
Mr Downer is correct that the first duty of responsible media is to get the facts straight even when that story might not necessarily conform to existing opinions or prejudices. But, as his experience highlights, this is equally true for politicians.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?