- Joined
- 25 October 2008
- Posts
- 80
- Reactions
- 1
4. I have it set up about 70cm away from me. At that distance, a 10pt font size (using Excel as example) is about the smallest that is viewable without me having to lean forward. Words and numbers on the far edges of the screen are slightly more difficult to read because of the increased distance. They are still readable... but requires an extra micro second or two for my eyes to really focus and read it.
This will become more of a problem as you get to the age of needing reading glasses (if you haven't already).
6. For trading, the benefit of this massive screen is probably limited.... but the peripherals are not as easily legible, and I ended up putting things that are less frequently viewed there. . . . A bank of 3 screens, with the two outer screens angled towards the middle, would actually offer better viewing angles.
In summary... I have no complaints about the screen itself, but the benefit of all those extra pixels is rather limited. And for the same price, you could instead invest in 3-5 full HD screen and some decent monitor stands and get the same screen real estate.
I only saw this post today, so too late to be of help before you made your purchase skc. The visual ergonomics pdf at https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/83067/guide-ergo-comp-workstations.pdf gives explanations and images, in particular Fig. 4 on Page 8 and Fig. 6 on Page 11.