- Joined
- 20 November 2005
- Posts
- 787
- Reactions
- 92
I think the main argument against a gambling analogy is that in gambling you either take a full 1R loss or a full 1R profit. In trading however one can reduce the initial 1R risk with relative ease and keep an unlimited profit potential. Doing so skews the number in ones favour - which can't be done with gambling.