- Joined
- 16 June 2005
- Posts
- 4,281
- Reactions
- 6
Extremely amused to be admonished on this forum for supposedly voting frivolously, when it is clear those who are voting "acceptably" don't even have a clue how the Westminister system functions.
...
I would argue the opposite - fear and ignorance is the modus operandi for political powerbrokers in the new era (especially the far right).The Greens rely more on public ignorance than either of the major parties. Their policies are little more than feelgood statements with no tangable assessment of overall economic impact.
Can't see any reason why they wont develop into a legitimate political force in elections to come. Some very sensible policies and their overall idealogy will capture the mood of the voting public by the time we are faced with a non-choice again at the next election.I just did a quick look through all the registered political parties and it seems the Liberal democratic party fits nearly all of my views on Australia.
http://www.ldp.org.au/
...In the same respect my vote may be better served with the coalition to stop the LaborSocialistGreens pushing policies down our throat.
http://senatoronline.org.au/ - look extremely interesting. Based on the premise that every person can vote on bills in the senate and then the elected senators will vote as per the majority.
Proper democracy
I would argue the opposite - fear and ignorance is the modus operandi for political powerbrokers in the new era (especially the far right).
The Greens have the highest proportion of members who are university-educated out of any major party in Australia.
A university education doesn't make you free from ignorance, nor does it make you politically savvy.
There is a difference between smarts and street smarts.
The Labor federal government prevented the Australian economy from falling into a deep recession and a consequent huge rise in unemployment, a group of more than 50 academic economists say.
The group, which includes professors and lecturers from the nation's leading universities, on Monday released an open letter supporting the fiscal stimulus measures taken during the global economic downturn
So they can 'affect an economy' but not 'control an economy'. I'm not sure where you'd draw a dividing line between the two.Stop misquoting me. I said governments can't control economies. Of course they can affect the health of an economy.
No, but they too have a significant effect, viz the multiple and rapid interest rate cuts to prevent economic stress. This was arguably as important or more important than the government's much lauded stimulus.But even central banks don't control economies.
I'm not trying to convince you to vote for anyone, sinner. I don't know even to whom you're referring when you talk about 'better economic managers' above, given both major parties are claiming this distinction.Electing a government based on the premise they are "better economic managers" completely ignores the reality of the situation we are in. Certainly it is obvious those "better economic managers" did not see the financial crisis coming, in fact if anything their policies exacerbated the problem. So what credentials are you actually trying to convince me to vote for?
I'm in total agreement with you here.Shame you can't put more than one party as your last preference.
The Greens have the highest proportion of members who are university-educated out of any major party in Australia.
True - but it's a much better measure than ignorant stereotypingA university education doesn't make you free from ignorance, nor does it make you politically savvy.
There is a difference between smarts and street smarts.
The problem is the fact that they are not educated beyond that university degree. In fact a lot of them are still there or are dropouts and didn't even get that education completed. It is a harder world out there than it is in a sheltered university campas. Give most of them another 10 or 20 years real education and they will end up being useless like their idol or change their attitude.The Greens have the highest proportion of members who are university-educated out of any major party in Australia.
Im pretty sure they also have the highest rate for smoking cannabis.
The problem is the fact that they are not educated beyond that university degree. In fact a lot of them are still there or are dropouts and didn't even get that education completed. It is a harder world out there than it is in a sheltered university campas. Give most of them another 10 or 20 years real education and they will end up being useless like their idol or change their attitude.
lol gotta love the stereotyping going on in this thread
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?