greggles
I'll be back!
- Joined
- 28 July 2004
- Posts
- 4,460
- Reactions
- 4,494
The 2011 spike was something of an anomaly, but it still sets a precedent. The 1980 spike to around the same price in 1980 (hundreds of dollars if we adjust for inflation) was an extreme anomaly, but two hits at the same level still set a precedent with some meaning. Obviously these historical prices are psychological only, not fundamental, so it doesn't really matter why they happened, just that they did. It may take a very long time to see that price again, but it could also happen fairly soon. Silver's price movements have always been peculiar, sort of following gold, not not exactly. Fairly following the timing of gold's ups and downs, but with different amplitudes. I see gold as a sure thing going up over the next few years. Silver I think will probably go up more, but I'm a lot less certain.
it's amazing how the 2011 price spike has coloured people's view of silver. If you remove that spike (and reversal) from September 2010 until June 2013 and imagine the spot price moving sideways and slightly up for that 21 month period, silver looks like a great long term investment, rising from US$4.20 in late 2002 to US$32 this year.
But so many people got burned in the 2011 spike that there is this strong emotional reaction to silver by a lot of people. Some truly despise it. Sure, if you invested heavily in April 2011, silver was unquestionably a bad investment... but if you invested in 1999 it's been a great investment.