There has been 5 named cyclones during the 2016/17 season.
Yvette, Alfred, Blanche, Caleb, and Debbie. As well as tropical lows 06U, 09U, 10U, 14U, 15U, 22U (which were all close, but didn't meet the official classifications of a cyclone system).
There has been 5 named cyclones during the 2016/17 season.And what is it? The first cyclone in two years? Geez I remember several a year as common.
Okay, lets go along with your uncertainty hypothesis for a moment.
The main source of nasty is the alarmists, wanting to imprison or assasinate sceptics, even if they are children... remember 350.org's little video?
Hoist by your own petard there olmate.
"Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (methane, carbon dioxide, etc.) let visible light pass through, but absorb infrared light
This causes the earth to heat up.
The warmer atmosphere emits more infrared light, which tends to be re-absorbed
Since the industrial age began around 1750, atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased by 40% and methane has increased by 150%.
Such increases cause extra infrared light absorption, further heating Earth above its typical temperature range (even as energy from the sun stays basically the same).
Energy that gets to Earth has an even harder time leaving it causing Earth’s average temperature to increase–– producing global climate change.
Emissions are measurable. Temperature changes are measurable. The effects are measurable.
They lead to the same conclusion. 97% of scientists agree. The standouts have ties to fossil fuel industries.
Thanks Karen! "
https://www.indy100.com/article/cli...ing-lorrie-goldstein-twitter-mic-drop-7476856
The last sentence says it all really.
Last year was the hottest March ever. This year might break this record.
The Great Barrier Reef is dying and cruise ships can now sail over the Arctic in summer.
Everyone run around and hold their heads and say "not happening!".
'For pro-free marketers climate change is a nasty bur in their shoe. If you accept climate change could lead to rising sea levels, coastal inundation, dislocation of large masses of people, increased intensity of tropical storms and droughts, and grave risks to food and water supply, then you have to accept the market failed to account for such impacts and not only allowed, but ensured they would happen.
Little wonder many free marketeer thinktanks and political parties have instead embraced lunatic theories about climate change being a conspiracy involving the UN, Nasa, every university in the world, China, all major meteorological bodies, the World Bank and the makers of tin foil hats.
Delusion is preferable to admitting fault.'
A very concise couple of paragraphs...
And when is all this going to happen?
Reminder..Tim Flannery said 10 years ago we never get enough rains to fill the dams in Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne......They are all full.....He said we would have continous drought for decades and crops would fail.....All the Labor states at the time took his advice and built desalinization plants costing billions dollars and still costing $500,000 to maintain each day an now in moth balls.......Where did he get his information from?..Was it the UN, NASA, NOAA or the CSIRO?
.there are some 35,500 who say they are wrong.
Name 5,000 of them.
There could possibly be a few named here http://www.petitionproject.org
The petition was organized and circulated by Arthur B. Robinson, president of the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (described as "a small independent research group") in 1998, and again in 2007.[1] Frederick Seitz, then the chairman of the George C. Marshall Institute, wrote a cover letter endorsing the petition, emphasizing connection to the National Academy of Sciences (of which Seitz had previously served as president).[2][3] "In a highly unusual move, the National Academy held a press conference to disclaim the mailing and distance itself from its former president."[3]
Robinson asserted in 2008 that the petition has over 31,000 signatories, with 9,000 of these holding a PhD degree.[1] Most signatories with a PhD hold their degree in engineering.[4] A 2009 report of the Nongovernmental Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC)—a group that "disputes the reality of man-made climate change"[5]—lists 31,478 degreed signatories, including 9,029 with PhDs.[6] The list has been criticized for its lack of verification, with pranksters successfully submitting the names of Charles Darwin, a member of the Spice Girls and characters from Star Wars, and getting them briefly included on the list.[7]
There could possibly be a few named here http://www.petitionproject.org
So its like Cookes 97%?
So its like Cookes 97%?
So its like Cookes 97%?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?