- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,295
- Reactions
- 17,525
Ummm I am confused ... Isn't it supposed to be hot in Summer ?? As in NOT raining with flooding?
Yep it gets hot everywhere ...
Hobart is running hot and ready to break yet another monthly maximum daily average record. It is currently averaging around 26 degrees this month during the day , the record is 25.1 degrees. With more scorching days ahead near close to 30 degrees that will only add to the anomaly. The night time temperatures are also around 4 degrees over average and show no sign of backing off either. I have never used the air con so much in Tasmania .Some rain fell and was enough to cause localised flooding in a few areas where falls were heaviest but it just soaked into the ground across most of the state.
We've now gone back to dry conditions it seems, with every day warmer than the long term average and with practically no rain forecast. The rains did some good in many areas, certainly a help to farmers, but overall much of the state is still pretty dry.
Hold your hats, sit down quietly, take a deep,deep breath.
There is such a thing as a constructive , evidenced based debate on climate change on the net ..
Isn't that unxxxxingbelievable !!!
Just came across the exchange while following up a post from Logicque on another thread. Couldn't believe my eyes.
http://www.debate.org/debates/Mankind-Is-the-Main-Cause-of-Global-Warming/10/
if I continued this debate and got people on my side, I could not forgive my self for 'uneducating' people. it would be a disgrace to my growth in science and what I stand for.
Hold your hats, sit down quietly, take a deep,deep breath.
There is such a thing as a constructive , evidenced based debate on climate change on the net ..
Isn't that unxxxxingbelievable !!!
Just came across the exchange while following up a post from Logicque on another thread. Couldn't believe my eyes.
http://www.debate.org/debates/Mankind-Is-the-Main-Cause-of-Global-Warming/10/
Hold your hats, sit down quietly, take a deep,deep breath.
There is such a thing as a constructive , evidenced based debate on climate change on the net ..
Isn't that unxxxxingbelievable !!!
Just came across the exchange while following up a post from Logicque on another thread. Couldn't believe my eyes.
http://www.debate.org/debates/Mankind-Is-the-Main-Cause-of-Global-Warming/10/
The con case was taken up by an apparent believer in AGW if I'm not mistaken, judging by the concluding comments, stating his heart wasn't really in the debate or his case.
This is a constructive and evidenced based "debate"? Holy Mother of Mary bas!!
That is like putting two socialists together and asking them to debate if socialism is good.
Unxxxxingbelievable indeed.
That is so brilliant TS. So absolutely you.
You manage to completely ignore the detailed, complex argument for the affirmative, miss the first response from the negative and manage to only quote the final capitulation line.
Excellent work. Underscores this thread perfectly.
PS
And don't worry. There were plenty of your mates represented in the comments. I don't know how the other debates go on that forum. I was just curious about that topic.
Rules
1. The first round is for acceptance.
2. A forfeit or concession is not allowed.
3. No semantics or trolling.
4. All arguments must be visible inside this debate. Sources may be posted in an outside link.
5. Debate resolution, definitions, rules, and structure cannot be changed without asking in the comments before you post your round 1 argument. Debate resolution, definitions, rules, and structure cannot be changed in the middle of the debate.Voters, in the case of the breaking of any of these rules by either debater, all seven points in voting should be given to the other person.
To be honest, I thought it would be a fun thing to debate someone on something controversial and funny. but I just can't bring my self to debate something that is intellectually dishonest and simply false. I withdraw my argument and forfeit.
Really don't know what you clowns are on about. I came across that "debate" by accident and I was/am impressed by the depth and accessibility of the argument run by the affirmative.
I was surprised that the opposition just folded.. Seemed a bit funny and as TS pointed out you're not supposed to forfeit.
It was no (big) deal as far as internet debates on CC go. It was just interesting to see some sense of formal debate format and evidence based argument as distinct form the rubbish that flies around most of the net forums.
Great one TS !! Delighted you have a sense of humour
Cheers
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?