This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

My open book trading plan - Two month test


So from your thesis I take it you will make your own decisions when you are in profit and won't require the help of professionals?

Blindly following experts without evolving can only lead to one thing when ne goes out on their own. Following professionals with understanding may be different.
 

I think you've misunderstood this a bit. The 2% everyone is refering to is max risk not position size. So for $75k, 2% risk per trade would be $1500, what some posters are saying is that this is to big and should be more like 1% or $750.00

I'm pretty sure there is a thread on the mistakes everyones made,
 

"thesis" yep sorry heh made me laugh though.. thanks.

I'm all up for criticism and comments help etc... that's why I'm here. Getting as much advice as possible without being able to give any back really :

I have many ambitions with trading, I've played stock market games and made profits (twice)... that was all by investing in companies that I simply liked AMD, INTC, IBM, then a few short sells where just following trends.

But... I will not be blindly following... just using pro's to point out promising leads, then I investigate further. The reports show charts, company outlooks etc... If I wanted to be blindly trading I would simply pay a broker... that's not the plan.
 

Thanks for clearing that up, that makes more sense now... but don't agree with it heheh. (i can see "mistake" signs in my head ... potentially me making a mistake here)

I like to look at charts and set stop levels depending on the trend, volatility, and share price. Cheaper stocks may have more swings than more expensive ones.

What if I invest 1.5K of my 75K ... should I set the stop loss at 0.00 as that would be a 2% loss?
 

Hi chrisdedavid,

Have a look at this post by Nizar, should clear things up for you

https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=161774&postcount=6
 

Your position size is determined by the 2%.
E.g XYZ - Purchased @ $1.00, stop set at $0.90 = 10c risk.
Therefore MAX position size is $750/$0.10 = 7500 shares x $1.00 = $7500
I also make allowances for fees when doing this so my max loss would be $700 + fees. e.g $700/$0.10 = 7000 shares
 
What if I invest 1.5K of my 75K ... should I set the stop loss at 0.00 as that would be a 2% loss?

The short answer is yes, if you're only going to put 1.5k into a position and you're prepared to risk 2% of total equity each time you take a bet you can effectively have no stop.
 

Few thoughts.Will be good for you to do this.
 
Hi Can

Didn’t see any mention of the time frame you had in mind. Choosing up front how many bars you are looking for can start to help maybe influence / determine your position sizing, risk, stop, trade frequency etc.

The best traders I have seen always have a very clear time frame in mind.

Have included a chart of AOE, which part of the move belongs to you?

This exercise will be huge for your own progress (and other forum members too) congratulations you just took the next step towards long term success

Focus

 

Attachments

  • AOE.gif
    6.4 KB · Views: 0

I would like to think we could have rode that whole trend Focus...i think my trailing stop would have held out, only just though.

Heres a little summary of the rules:

The open book system rules.
Universe: IG Markets Controlled Risk securities list
Starting Capital: $75000, unleveraged
Trade duration: Medium to long term
Trade direction: Long and short
Risk % per trade: 1% of available capital per trade
Position size: To be determined by fixed fractional positioning @ 1% capital risk:
Initial stop: Just below strong technical support
Breakeven Stop: 2 x initial stop
Trailing stop: just below new higher low
Profit stop: Yet to be determined - open to discussion.
 

Attachments

  • AOE.gif
    6.4 KB · Views: 0
Heres a few potentials for Monday.

Cheers,
 

Attachments

  • DJS.jpg
    123.3 KB · Views: 218

Can.
I have seen a system hit 84% winners and make 30% annual return with acceptable drawdowns and it was based on 2 exits:
1. Profit taking exit at 100%
2. If 1 was not satisfied, then a 3 year time stop was used.

Even though such a pair of exits goes against the saying of:
"Chop your dogs and let your winners run", the results are still what i would call, above average.

Universe was s&p500, money management 10% each position.
Entry was random.
Drawdowns were acceptable (to me), with average max peak to valley drawdown of 21%.

I read about this and saw the reports and monte carlo on reefcap forum. A great tool for discussion of mechanical systems trading.

Somethings to think about -- and test.
 
Heres a few potentials for Monday.

Cheers,

Ady looking good for an entry for me on Monday.
I like the way it bounced off 25c -- the resistance point. On volume as well.
With end of day stop a touch below 25.

Cul as well, stop with a close below 6.

What do you think of these?

Actually what is your entry criteria?
 
This was a good short the other week, could be another potential trade, long this time.

Nizar, ADY is not in my universe unfortunately...entry's criteria to find reversals, breakouts, triangles etc. so i can get in with a stop just below strong support.

This is a descretionary system remember. Were you thinking it was mechanical?

Cheers,
 

Attachments

  • PSV.jpg
    120.2 KB · Views: 220
I'd be waiting to see what this one does on monday before entering long - If it holds its ground and closes up, I'd be interested.
 
Anything I'm missing here?

Probably

CanOz In all seriousness if the quality of setup you are looking at is like the one above,then your likelyhood of success is very remote.Your attempting to trade against the governing trend.

When taking a discretionary trade

I ALWAYS ask myself.
(1) Where is the trade relative to the governing trend.
(2) How long am I likely to be able to stay with the trend.
(3) Why should I NOT be in this trade?

Sure you can trade pullbacks.
But the above doesnt qualify as a pullback does it?
Frankly I wouldnt even be looking for a short setup in it either.
Remember stocks run in 4 cycles.
(1) Accumulation
(2) Uptrend
(3) Distribution
(4) Retracement.


You want to trade OUT OF (1)
or WITH (2)
 
CanOz - best of luck (in all seriousness). You might be right. I personally also the weekly chart and there is nothing convincing there for me.

Tim
 

Thanks Tech for your input.

Most of what i'll present here in the next few days are charts for the watchlists. I've got quite a few more yet to come. Your comments, however stupid they make me feel at times, are a learning experience for me and
I really appreciate the comments on them. Remember i can go short (in theory) and this is an area where i'm even worse at picking opportunities, IMO.

Professor, i totally agree. I would be looking for a it to confirm the breakout and then make the new higher low around that old support i marked with the line.

To search for opportunities, what i like to do is go through the sectors first. The weakess sectors then i can scan for shorting opps, and the stronger sectors for long opps.

The only issue i have at the moment is confining it my my universe. The reason (for Nizar) that i'm using this universe is that i will eventually want to use this system for CFD's. The universe is the IG Markets controlled risk CFD list.

Cheers,
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...