- Joined
- 14 April 2007
- Posts
- 317
- Reactions
- 0
My system testing clearly shows that taking a trade during low volatility periods greatly increase the risk/reward benefits of a trade. As an example, if you measure the distance between an entry and initial protective stop level, then only take trades below X$, then you will find that the results will be a lot better. As an example, calculate the dollar difference between a channel breakout and its stop; assume 50-day entry and 13-day exit. If that amount is less than X$, then take the trade. If it's more then forego the trade.
ok guys here is MRE. I had posted about it in the potential breakout thread where Can suggested me to discuss it here along with my R/R and profit target. I liked his idea so here it is.
Now provided I buy it (on paper) at tomorrow's open at $7.69 my first target and expected resistance is $8.61 and stop loss trigger is at $7.02. Now this is 9%, but I generally use 3% as stop loss. The 7.02 is based on the support line.
Based on the support line stop loss, the R/R would be 1.33:1 , not good enough. but if using a 3% stop loss the R/R is 4:1 . Is my calculations correct ?
Also the volume is speaking another story...
Ok, well to be honest, since i've started using Fibb on triangles to calculate R/R, i can't really to get too excited over anything less than 3:1.
On triangles, i'm putting my stop usually just below the apex, i can't get any closer than that realistically.
The chart i posted, MCR, has a decent R/R to the secondary target (6.8:1)...i guess i'm looking for some advice....a bit unsure, but at the moment i think i'm needing 3:1 to enter a trade...provided i've used the proper stop level etc.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
Just taking the "character of the action"
Esp comparing the last bar to the action at and from the high
How much demand do You think is evident
JUST RIGHT NOW ?
motorway
Now I've got to try to learn to apply this in my trading, lol.
Well, i've made an exec. decision to buy MRE at market this morning..provided it doesn't GAP up. If it does, there may be another opportunity.
Also, Motorway, further to lack of followup volume on MCR (sweet bugger all), are we looking for confirmation of the confirmation? The breakout of the triangle was confirmed, we simple had to purchase at market the following day. That day turned out to be a fizzer, but also to note that with the lack of demand, there was also lack of supply.
Your thoughts on this?
Cheers,
If there is a lack of demand ( where We were looking for some to turn up ? )
What happens when the supply does turn up ?
Review the context . From the "Top"
What is
The compelling argument
for taking a long or for taking a short and when
There are two sides to a story
Giving both proper due..
What is the verdict. IS it possible to have one atm ?
motorway
What is the verdict. IS it possible to have one atm ?
With the view of answering Motorways question.
ok tech/a i will try to answer this, i might not have a clue yet but here goes.
demand was met with supply up to 26/06 above ave vol short range
supply took over 27/06 wider range larger vol
supply searched searched 28/06 same range as 27/06 low vol
demand searched 29/06 same range a bit more vol
supply won the day 2/07 same range huge vol which means it was met with alot of demand as well
3/07 supply met with demand low vol
4/07 supply almost met with same amount of demand on more vol
so overal the supply is runing out and the demand is coming in?
and todays action not finished yet but looks positive, more vol would be better.
chart a bit delayed but while typing this the sp is at 1.315(green line )
supply won the day 2/07 same range huge vol which means it was met with alot of demand as well
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?