- Joined
- 14 April 2007
- Posts
- 317
- Reactions
- 0
My system testing clearly shows that taking a trade during low volatility periods greatly increase the risk/reward benefits of a trade. As an example, if you measure the distance between an entry and initial protective stop level, then only take trades below X$, then you will find that the results will be a lot better. As an example, calculate the dollar difference between a channel breakout and its stop; assume 50-day entry and 13-day exit. If that amount is less than X$, then take the trade. If it's more then forego the trade.
Hi Nick,
Just for my clarification, given the difference in price for each potential trade, wouldn't you want to ensure that trades taken were below x %, as opposed to an actual x$ amount?? eg. If the entry was $100 and stop $95then = 5% difference.
Also, would this exercise be carried out in place of calculating your R:R ratio or in addition to it? ie. as a final step before commiting to the trade.
Thanks.....
PS. As another poster has commented, I'm also learning a lot from this one thread!!!