- Joined
- 24 December 2005
- Posts
- 2,601
- Reactions
- 2,065
Yeah no! I have a high threshold for pain but riding all the way down to the bottom is not my ideal business plan!Agree. I've read other analysis along those lines. And, there's some stats about investing at the top of the market before a crash and you redeem your money in X amount of time if you just hold on. As long everything you'd invested in didn't go bankrupt, so it might depend a bit on your asset allocation and time horizon.
Loving your new avi Sean! ?
I never use other people's guides, I have always only ever eyeballed it. I look at something and go, yeah near enough!
However, being only half a cup I am not sure I can claim it to be one nor am I confident it will resolve as a Cup & Handle.
Well I am sure we would all put pics of ourselves up if we had a head as good looking as yours.Dahab, diving with the fishes, 2005. I'm not sure why more people don't put their true selves up.
View attachment 136411
I see your 'cup' as the 'handle' and don't expect a really deep retrace, handles tend to take off once they are clear of the horizontal overhead.
me ??So will you exit everything if the market keeps falling, or hold some with a long term view?
When the markets are in the decline there is no long term view for me. There are stocks I like and will re-enter after a fall or a break in the 'sell' level after they come back above some designated support line.So will you exit everything if the market keeps falling, or hold some with a long term view?
Yes, in the past I always had an exit strategy at that 'sell' level but this is what I am trying to improve with the KISS thread. Riding it down to the 'sell' level has seen me give back big percentages to the market in the past. I rarely lost capital, except for a rare exception and that was generally because I broke my rules.I was mainly asking @Ann the question, she has been showing the suggested exit points, I was wondering if she applies the same rules to all her holdings or just certain ones she trades.
28/01/2022 | Sell | CQE | 1,666 | 3.730 | 19.95 | 6,194.23 | 1/02/2022 | Confirmed |
Rubbish, rubbish, rubbish! Taking another look at CQE my 'sell under' level would have been $3.57 not $3.33. Although now that I look at this chart I really gave a lot back to the market even selling at $3.73. I need to get a lot better at this. I think I need to bring in some simple indicators such as the RSI and actually look at them at a high point, the risk is I end up behaving like almost a day trader....need to ponder on this.I took the opportunity to sell CQE on Friday. The normal support level I would give to CQE would have been $3.33 as my 'sell under' level. I would have got something a little under 10%, not including brokerage, not awful but not good either.
Hi Rob,Hi Ann,
Just making sure that you don't get confused between a 200 bar exponential moving average (ema) and a 200 bar Dema as they are calculated differently.
Cheers, Rob
It is fine so far John, most of them are well above the sell line, but I do have my sell prices organized in case something decides to weaken. None of them looks weak just offering up buying opportunities for those more patient than myself. Some of these I bought too high. I am hoping a bit more study of volume may give me a better view of entrances. More practice is required. I have in the past entered purely on chart shape but now I know often a stock will be at a high with high volume before a pullback and vice versa. That will indicate a possible fall or rise in the immediate future. I also notice if there is a high volume in the middle between high and low then the rise is not sustained. I noticed this when I was getting up close and personal when I first started looking at volumes. I was looking at the charts of the Competition for Feb. It was WIN which showed me the high volume high, pull back and the high volume low, lift in price and it was LPI which showed me the restricted rise after a high volume in the middle. I have taken note of this and have found it to be true elsewhere as well. Too hard to describe...picture.Hmmm
15% losses and 5% wins .
Gotta take care of this Ann.
Hi Ann, my suggestion would be to study candlestick analysis rather than volume. If you decide to do this and want any recommendations of where to find free info then let me know.I am hoping a bit more study of volume may give me a better view of entrances.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?