Islam: Is it inherently Evil?

DB008 · 25 August 2016

Following the stabbing murder in Cairns yesterday, Bob Katter has called for a ban on immigrants from the M.E. and Africa

http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-...er-calls-for-middle-east-immigration-ban.html

SirRumpole · 25 August 2016

DB008 said:
Following the stabbing murder in Cairns yesterday, Bob Katter has called for a ban on immigrants from the M.E. and Africa

http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-...er-calls-for-middle-east-immigration-ban.html

Isn't the stabber a Frenchman ?

In any case it hasn't been established that he is a radical.

qldfrog · 25 August 2016

SirRumpole said:
Isn't the stabber a Frenchman ?

In any case it hasn't been established that he is a radical.

The frenchman or the arab frenchman to reuse the "african american" usage word to word;
another example of a mental case not a radical, just a mental/cultural thing: you as non muslim are sh*t, she is a slut (travelling alone, no brother to chaperon, modelling) and all the consequences "you" deserve in his rightful mind:
We'll have to learnt to live with a lot of these mental illnesses if we want to call a religion that
perfectly fitted to the thread title

luutzu · 25 August 2016

DB008 said:
Sky News is reporting this as a obsession/fatal attraction.....

Not terror related at all.

No mention of 'Allah Akbar' shouting.

Self censoring???

How, or why, would the media be "self censoring"?

The head honchos at those outlets know who butter their bread; who pays the bills and who provide "inside" and unnamed and high-placed sources for "information" and scoups.

So any murder and killings will start with "is it Islamic; is it terrorism". If the guilty party is Arabic, must be terrorism, but might not be, we ain't sure - just putting it out there.

If they're of another race... well it's just some psycho.

Why all these?

First, it sells viewership and eyeballs - more attention, more money;

Second, it's an indirect way to scare the public into possibilities of terrorist attacks anywhere, at any time.

Why scare the public?

Because the public are weak and idiotic and would never allow the killing of innocent people who does them no harm.

So you better scare them out of their wits; make them jumpy... then you and your army get all the funding you ever need, with no opposition, to carry out your imperial grand strategy - saving the world, civilising the savages, nation-building... and if there's an attack against "us" somewhere, then it's revenge too.

Then along the way and after all the effort to bring peace to the world, they might discover that those countries happen to have oil and good strategic location for a military base or five.

Then those who build weapons, provide contractors, supply the maintenance... they too might discover that war is very profitable.. and heck, might even buy a few hundred millions in ads on them news media.

luutzu · 25 August 2016

qldfrog said:
The frenchman or the arab frenchman to reuse the "african american" usage word to word;
another example of a mental case not a radical, just a mental/cultural thing: you as non muslim are sh*t, she is a slut (travelling alone, no brother to chaperon, modelling) and all the consequences "you" deserve in his rightful mind:
We'll have to learnt to live with a lot of these mental illnesses if we want to call a religion that
perfectly fitted to the thread title

Scanned the headline and it said she was in his room, they knew each other? Maybe the farker couldn't take her rejection after his advances?

Anyway... so the next time some French people, the White [olive?] French criminal does something horrible... we'll blame your entire French people and yourself along with it.

Or only French Australian, Male?

superbatman · 25 August 2016

Garpal Gumnut said:
I have been ruminating over Islam since 9/11.

I have a fair few Muslim mates, they are good people and devout.

I do not have much truck with religion.

The unpredictability of evil such as ISIS and the terrorist attacks in Canada makes me wonder.

Is Islam evil?

gg

Majority of the peoples from that religion is involved in crimes all over the world, not just terrorism. I believe this religion does not respect the value of other religion (Not even Christianity)

Ijustnewit · 25 August 2016

The press have released the French attackers name , Smail Ayad 29 . Yeah that sounds French . nothing to see here .

luutzu · 25 August 2016

Ijustnewit said:
The press have released the French attackers name , Smail Ayad 29 . Yeah that sounds French . nothing to see here .

I know. If only his name was Guise Colbert Francois ey.

Then we'd be able to just call him a bloody psycho and feel sad for the parents and family of the victim.

Now, we'd have to talk about media conspiracies; the West losing its freedom of speech; Islam is evil or is it not evil if taken in small dosage...

Tisme · 25 August 2016

luutzu said:
I know. If only his name was Guise Colbert Francois ey.

Then we'd be able to just call him a bloody psycho and feel sad for the parents and family of the victim.

Now, we'd have to talk about media conspiracies; the West losing its freedom of speech; Islam is evil or is it not evil if taken in small dosage...

Now you're getting the picture: one is part of an organised religion that encourages, organises and rewards his actions, the other is a lone wolf who operates out of primal urges and usually blind rage.

Ijustnewit · 25 August 2016

luutzu said:
I know. If only his name was Guise Colbert Francois ey.

Then we'd be able to just call him a bloody psycho and feel sad for the parents and family of the victim.

Now, we'd have to talk about media conspiracies; the West losing its freedom of speech; Islam is evil or is it not evil if taken in small dosage...

If you prefer to stick your head in the sand and not explore all possible options of why some one would stab an animal and other humans singing out Allahu Akbar that's fine. Of course you will probably take the angle that it was victims and the dogs fault .
Almost the same thought of thinking that has led to giving young girls and women at German pools being given fake tattoos to wear that say Nein . Just so the poor immigrant men know they are off limits to touching and sexual approaches.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...man-swimming-pools-help-stop-sex-attacks.html

luutzu · 25 August 2016

Ijustnewit said:
If you prefer to stick your head in the sand and not explore all possible options of why some one would stab an animal and other humans singing out Allahu Akbar that's fine. Of course you will probably take the angle that it was victims and the dogs fault .
Almost the same thought of thinking that has led to giving young girls and women at German pools being given fake tattoos to wear that say Nein . Just so the poor immigrant men know they are off limits to touching and sexual approaches.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...man-swimming-pools-help-stop-sex-attacks.html

Why would anyone ever blame the victims?
It's pretty messed up to blame victims... that'd be like blaming refugees for wanting to escape warzones for some reason.

Why is it that people always think that all you need to stop criminals is telling to stop?

CanOz · 25 August 2016

I was pretty moderate until Lu got on his soap box....now I'm a racist conservative!

luutzu · 25 August 2016

CanOz said:
I was pretty moderate until Lu got on his soap box....now I'm a racist conservative!

Well, they do say that today's political spectrum has shifted way, way, way Right.

Go in any direction far enough and I think they call it a revolution.

So you welcome CanOz.

luutzu · 25 August 2016

Tisme said:
Now you're getting the picture: one is part of an organised religion that encourages, organises and rewards his actions, the other is a lone wolf who operates out of primal urges and usually blind rage.

So one group need to hear voices - or pray very hard until they hear voices - to carry out some crazy shiet. Another group just carry out crazy shiet whenever they feel like it?

Not too sure who's scarier McGill.

With the religious nuts, there's always hope that you can convince them that God didn't want them to do it; With the latter, they just want to do it and won't be listening.

Tisme · 25 August 2016

CanOz said:
I was pretty moderate until Lu got on his soap box....now I'm a racist conservative!

funny

bellenuit · 1 September 2016

CanOz · 1 September 2016

bellenuit said:

Evidence of the SICK world that RELIGION had created!!!

qldfrog · 1 September 2016

CanOz said:
Evidence of the SICK world that RELIGION had created!!!

RELIGION or Islam?
I do not believe many christians or even jews refuse to face muslim opponents in sport, or shake their hand in judo or wrestling

luutzu · 1 September 2016

qldfrog said:
RELIGION or Islam?
I do not believe many christians or even jews refuse to face muslim opponents in sport, or shake their hand in judo or wrestling

Yup, if history teaches us anything it is that there are no racist Jews or Christians. Like, never.

That's a bit far fetch... OK.

If today's news teaches us anything, it's that there are no racist Jews or Christians, at all.

Every other culture and country, any group of people... there are nuts and racists and idiots... except for Christians and Jews. As pure as can be.

Tisme · 1 September 2016

luutzu said:
Yup, if history teaches us anything it is that there are no racist XXX or Christians. .

Never a truer word spoken. Racism is a word made to weaponise those who envy whitey.

Islam: Is it inherently Evil?

DB008

SirRumpole

qldfrog

luutzu

luutzu

superbatman

Ijustnewit

luutzu

Tisme

Apathetic at Best

Ijustnewit

luutzu

CanOz

Home runs feel good, but base hits pay bills!

luutzu

luutzu

Tisme

Apathetic at Best

bellenuit

CanOz

Home runs feel good, but base hits pay bills!

qldfrog

luutzu

Tisme

Apathetic at Best

Similar threads

Islam: Is it inherently Evil?

Apathetic at Best

Home runs feel good, but base hits pay bills!

Apathetic at Best

Home runs feel good, but base hits pay bills!

Apathetic at Best

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency