- Joined
- 8 June 2008
- Posts
- 13,223
- Reactions
- 19,513
I would be really disappointed in you Sir Rumpole if you were to genouinely believe that gun control would have avoided a single casualty in that caselYou don't think gun control had anything to do with it ?
The guy had a gun license even though he was twice investigated by the FBI for radicalisation.
WTF are they doing over there letting people like him have guns ?
I am not sure that it was a Jihad attack. From news reports thus far, it sounds more like the crime was motivated by a hatred of homosexuals.I would be really disappointed in you Sir Rumpole if you were to genouinely believe that gun control would have avoided a single casualty in that casel
no one is allowed to buy automatic weapon in France, definitively not the AK47 used in Bataclam yet...
I am for sensible gun control: no automatic for any reason, etc
But to throw sand in the eyes of the public and put that rubbish blaming gun control in such a clear Jihad attack...
And in Boston, the problem was fertiliser in supermatket, unless it is pressure cookers which should need a background check?
I would be really disappointed in you Sir Rumpole if you were to genouinely believe that gun control would have avoided a single casualty in that casel
no one is allowed to buy automatic weapon in France, definitively not the AK47 used in Bataclam yet...
I am for sensible gun control: no automatic for any reason, etc
But to throw sand in the eyes of the public and put that rubbish blaming gun control in such a clear Jihad attack...
And in Boston, the problem was fertiliser in supermatket, unless it is pressure cookers which should need a background check?
I am not sure that it was a Jihad attack. From news reports thus far, it sounds more like the crime was motivated by a hatred of homosexuals.
Quite possibly a hatred enflamed by his religious beliefs.
So this was just a lunatic act of course and yes, lunatics, dumped lovers etcv will do less damage with gun control.The only people who should be allowed to possess military assault rifles should be the military. And people who are being investigated by the FBI should not own them at all.
Maybe this guy would have stolen a gun or purchased one illegally, who know , but if you make it harder for the lunatics then you reduce the chances of mass slaughter.
How many mass killings have there been in Oz since the gun laws ? How many in the USA ? How many deaths by firearms in each country ?
Give it a rest Mr Frog, gun control makes a difference.
So this was just a lunatic act of course and yes, lunatics, dumped lovers etcv will do less damage with gun control.
But when someone plan a terrorist act, finding the mean is never an issue.
I favour some gun control (seriously, who needs assault gun to shoot deers), but to turn an issue which is roughly a 1400 y old fight of Islam vs the rest of the world into a US owned gun control problem, is quite a nice Houdini act, yet suckers line up to swallow it;
more more more please
indeed!
It must be nice living in these bubbles, quite comfortable indeed,a bit like the pampered turkeys before Thanksgiving.(need to have an American image)
Of course gun control is needed, what my stance is:Oh please, it's not all about gun control, of course there is the terrorism aspect. I refer you again to the number of deaths by gun per capita in the USA and Australia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate
So trying to take one incident and say gun control doesn't work is invalid. Americans die by gun at about 10 times the rate that we do. Any ideas why ?
Of course gun control is needed, what my stance is:
in that specific case as in any case where such fanatics are involved (aka the couple in california a few months ago) the fact they have an easily purchased gun is irrelevant;
in a country without gun, they would steal a fuel tanker and crash it agains the disco; remember 9/11: they did not need bazookas, artillery or RPGs
And to see the sheeps following the comfortable view "blame it on these stupid Americans with their idiotic gun laws' is maddening, the media playing there an act of manipulation.
But fronting the real issue is so much harder and goes against so much ingrained convictions....
Anyway, just a mad man i am sure, we should not generalised, we will see the muslim and the priests/mayor, even maybe president, arm in arm singing the "we are one" song.
SirRumpole, Europe has been sold this masquerade to death, actual death of a civilisation.
Maybe just maybe people should open their eyes, and start reading the Koran, understanding that as opposed to the bible it is a literal code of life to be followed to the letter as claimed by the obscurantists who have been in control in the mosks(sp?) for the last 4 decades or so, this thanks to oil money and our western governments.
The truth is ugly and terrifying, it is not a reason to hide it.
Fully agree on both points.I agree that Islam is a potential (maybe even current) danger to our society and that we should not allow it to grow here, but in the absence of terrorism we should also not ignore the potential, so often displayed in the US, for gun violence and the effect that gun control has on reducing this in countries other than the US.
There are other threads for this, so maybe I'm off topic. As to the title of the thread, if Islam motivates people to do evil acts then it is in itself evil.
Thanks Bellenuit, music to my hear but it won't be long before the usual suspects blame this attack on the bombing in Lybia/Syria, Irak you name it;or just on gun control absence
It is a deep and knowledgeable analysis:
did you know that a century ago, 25% of ME population were not muslim; it took less than a 100 y to wipe them out.
I am afraid Islam now is back to its worst form ever, a results of ignorance, overpopulation, political and geopolitical manoeuvres, and of the price of oil with the most backward governments in the world in position of strength.
Just my opinion...
Mateen
"The real Muslims will never accept the filthy ways of the West"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?