Islam: Is it inherently Evil?

[luutzu]

Relevance, grasshopper?

apart from repeating yourself ad nauseam

It's repeated because we're always following the same recipe.

Doing the same thing over and over but hoping for a different result is the definition of what?

Oh, let's change it by setting up concentration camps and banning Mosques and stopping refugees.

Anyway..

 

[wayneL]

My comment was about the ludicrous PC left, virtue signallers, bleeding hearts and The Moonbat, not muslims.

If you're suggesting concentration camps for these cultural vandals, I'm all for it as it is tantamount to treason.

 

[luutzu]

My comment was about the ludicrous PC left, virtue signallers, bleeding hearts and The Moonbat, not muslims.

If you're suggesting concentration camps for these cultural vandals, I'm all for it as it is tantamount to treason.

Who are we going to put into those camps? If Terrorists then for sure. But aren't terrorists and other criminals already have places for them, right now? It's call a prison.

You talk about bleeding hearts, PC left and other idiots as though they're [we're] naive crazies suffering from Stockholm. What's the Right's "realist" solution? Wipe them out, lock them all up. Them being all Muslims and other undesirables.

Who needs law and courts and rights and liberties when it mean we can't wage wars at will.

 

[Tisme]

This bloke obviously hasn't been told to get with the program and make excuses for Islamic bombers instead of helping victims:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-children-injured-arena-bombing-a7751656.html

And this guy is only encouraging Stephen's behaviour:

https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...e-to-homeless-man-manchester-attack/22107322/

 

[luutzu]

This bloke obviously hasn't been told to get with the program and make excuses for Islamic bombers instead of helping victims:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-children-injured-arena-bombing-a7751656.html

And this guy is only encouraging Stephen's behaviour:

https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...e-to-homeless-man-manchester-attack/22107322/

Who's excusing terrorist or terrorism?

It goes without saying that such senseless murder is just horrific and inexcusable, and people like Stephen there and the first responders should all be thanked. All the flowers, the hopes and prayers from the politicians, the media... those aren't going to bring back the lives lost.

They're not going to prevent future attacks either. Neither will banning Muslims, burning down their Mosques, sending them to concentration camps or that final solution.

Calling them names, pointing to their terrorists as representative of all of their kind, pointing to our heroes as examples of who we all are... these make us feel better but are at best only partially true, it does not paint the whole picture. And it's that complete picture that we better try and see if we're going to seriously solve this war and terrorism business.

 

[Tisme]

And it's that complete picture that we better try and see if we're going to seriously solve this war and terrorism business.

"try to", not "try and"

grammar nazism

 

[luutzu]

"try to", not "try and"

grammar nazism

As long as that's the only Nazi stuff we're planning, it's cool.

btw, I would have thought there'd be more grammatical errors than that one you have found. I knew helping the kids with their readings weren't just for their benefit.

And ey, when does the kids correcting us turn from pride to just outright annoyance at their supposed superiority?

 

[noco]

 

[Kerway]

Islam is not inherently evil. Just as the Allies were not evil when bombing men, woman and children during WW2. The problem lies with the hatred that a minority of them hold for Western culture and our way of life. In many cases, we have let them into our midst as refugees only for them to turn on the hand that feeds them.

 

[noco]

The Germans wanted to dominate the world and failed.

The Japanese tried and failed.

And now Islam is invading the Western World and they will be beaten back as well whether it is by civil war or by an Islam reform.......One way or the other they will fail.

 

[Garpal Gumnut]

My comment was about the ludicrous PC left, virtue signallers, bleeding hearts and The Moonbat, not muslims.

If you're suggesting concentration camps for these cultural vandals, I'm all for it as it is tantamount to treason.

I'd certainly agree that we need to be careful about the many people who turn a blind eye to Fascist Islamism as the German people did before and during WW2.

The Nazi's began putting Jews, homosexuals, gypsies and criminals in to concentration camps and then moved on to Poles, Slavs and POWs from Russia. The destructive war was initially supported by Germans. The "good" Muslim diaspora similarly seem unable to contain the fascists amongst them. This bodes ill if ISIS continue their aggression in countries that have taken ordinary good Muslims as refugees.

Unfortunately many non Muslims of the Left/Green class support a "World Integration" and frown on closed borders, and these are now in control of our media and major think tanks and in some cases parliaments. I believe these are to whom you refer.

The answer is at hand, many left leaning publications such as Fairfax are going broke, the voters are electing more independents who reflect their views better than the parties and hopefully stronger measures on borders and fascism will eliminate Fascist Islamism.

So vote appropriately, don't buy or click on sites that oppose your views and be vigilant.

gg

 

[SirRumpole]

left leaning publications such as Fairfax are going broke,

The company that publishes the Financial Review is left leaning ?

That's an interesting observation.

 

[Garpal Gumnut]

The company that publishes the Financial Review is left leaning ?

That's an interesting observation.

Now come on Rumpole,

The AFR is the only publication that makes money for them. It is left leaning in many of it's opinion pieces, just as peculiarly the SMH editorials before the last few elections suggested voting Coalition.

The fact is that the Culture of Fairfax journalism is left-leaning. If you deny this you will piss off many Fairfax journos.

gg

 

[SirRumpole]

Now come on Rumpole,

The AFR is the only publication that makes money for them. It is left leaning in many of it's opinion pieces, just as peculiarly the SMH editorials before the last few elections suggested voting Coalition.

The fact is that the Culture of Fairfax journalism is left-leaning. If you deny this you will piss off many Fairfax journos.

gg

Well, I would have thought that they were pretty much in the centre, but I suppose that depends on where one stands oneself.

 

[qldfrog]

Well, I would have thought that they were pretty much in the centre, but I suppose that depends on where one stands oneself.

They may not be so left as to be "green" but reading the AFR every week I am certain they do follow the now jopurnalism mainstream of globalism socialism or whatever we want to call that

 

[noco]

Islam!!!!!! a religion of peace.......Islam is not a religion but a political ideology.

 

[Garpal Gumnut]

Well, I would have thought that they were pretty much in the centre, but I suppose that depends on where one stands oneself.

As soft as brie a response, and not as sweet smelling.

Take a stance Rumpole, you cad, argue and do not dissemble, or throw your wig in to the the Walbrook.

gg

 

[SirRumpole]

As soft as brie a response, and not as sweet smelling.

Take a stance Rumpole, you cad, argue and do not dissemble, or throw your wig in to the the Walbrook.

gg

The last time I read the SMH (once a year while having my car serviced), I was not able to discern bias either way. There seemed a reasonable coverage of stories. What more can I say ?

 

[Ves]

Unfortunately many non Muslims of the Left/Green class support a "World Integration" and frown on closed borders, and these are now in control of our media and major think tanks and in some cases parliaments. I believe these are to whom you refer.

The world integration you are talking about is part of the globalisation of economies.

This is a neo-liberal policy.

It appears in policies on both the left and right of politics.

The theory is the the more people involved, the more consumers you create.

It's actually pretty dishonest to say that it's only a "left/green" theme.

 

[Garpal Gumnut]

The world integration you are talking about is part of the globalisation of economies.

This is a neo-liberal policy.

It appears in policies on both the left and right of politics.

The theory is the the more people involved, the more consumers you create.

It's actually pretty dishonest to say that it's only a "left/green" theme.

I believe you are confusing Trade Globalisation and Thought/Belief/Civil Globalisation.

Greens push the latter to the beat of their own drum.

gg