Islam: Is it inherently Evil?

[noco]

Is this what we can expect down the track in our country......No wonder people are starting to get up in arms about it all....No wonder One Nation is gaining traction.

https://www.facebook.com/FreedomOfS...300043967576/1918031155094460/?type=3&theater

 

[noco]

Paris today...Sydney in 5 years.....And what should we be doing about it?...Now is the time to take action before it is too late.

 

[Tisme]

Paris today...Sydney in 5 years.....And what should we be doing about it?...Now is the time to take action before it is too late.

Shame they aren't so brave in their homeland.

 

[noco]

This why we should be doing more to stop the advance of Islam.

 

[luutzu]

Paris today...Sydney in 5 years.....And what should we be doing about it?...Now is the time to take action before it is too late.

Strange how I don't remember any riots in France this year.

There was that clearing of "the jungle" where refugees was sheltering. Some hippies was out protesting about that and people were bussed away. A riot like that I haven't seen.

Link us another source, this time with a date stamp noco.

 

[noco]

Strange how I don't remember any riots in France this year.

There was that clearing of "the jungle" where refugees was sheltering. Some hippies was out protesting about that and people were bussed away. A riot like that I haven't seen.

Link us another source, this time with a date stamp noco.

Perhaps you read it again...It happened in 2017.

 

[luutzu]

Paris today...Sydney in 5 years.....And what should we be doing about it?...Now is the time to take action before it is too late.

Is this the same one?

They said it's riots against police brutality. Set off by a 22 year old black kid claiming (?) he was raped and beaten by the police.

The channel is Russian TV but it doesn't seem to show Muslim youth rioting because Islam tells them to though.

 

[noco]

Is this the same one?

They said it's riots against police brutality. Set off by a 22 year old black kid claiming (?) he was raped and beaten by the police.

The channel is Russian TV but it doesn't seem to show Muslim youth rioting because Islam tells them to though.

No it is not the same one...How can you compare the two?...Furthermore I don't see any date on your video.

 

[luutzu]

No it is not the same one...How can you compare the two?...Furthermore I don't see any date on your video.

Pretty sure the date was in Feb 2017.

There's plenty of riots noco. Those that are just caused by Muslims wanting Jihad would have already been all locked up somewhere.

So who knows, sometimes black and brown people riot not because Allah told them to, but simply because they feel they've been harassed and unfairly targetted for no other reason than they don't look White.

Just look at the race riots in the US. Cops shoot black people, when it got caught on camera one too many time, a city or two get scary black people rioting.

I think there's some protests by the Climate Scientists in the US soon. For end of April.

Heard the scientists are a bit shocked at the budget cuts and policies Trump and his cronies has been doing.

 

[noco]

Strange how I don't remember any riots in France this year.

There was that clearing of "the jungle" where refugees was sheltering. Some hippies was out protesting about that and people were bussed away. A riot like that I haven't seen.

Link us another source, this time with a date stamp noco.

You seem to have contradicted yourself in just 24 hours.

 

[Tisme]

When global war finally breaks out, will the govt hire 457 visa holders for the fight?

 

[luutzu]

You seem to have contradicted yourself in just 24 hours.

No, I searched YouTube under "paris riots" and that RT news clip came up. It was dated around Feb 2017. I thought it would have been shown on the news scrawls itself but you can check it out if you like.

As to the clip you posted of hooded rioters and an Allah Arkbar here and there from another scene, or maybe the same riot... It look like one of those edited footage designed to say something without saying it.

 

[noco]

No, I searched YouTube under "paris riots" and that RT news clip came up. It was dated around Feb 2017. I thought it would have been shown on the news scrawls itself but you can check it out if you like.

As to the clip you posted of hooded rioters and an Allah Arkbar here and there from another scene, or maybe the same riot... It look like one of those edited footage designed to say something without saying it.

Oh man oh man Luu .....your head is all mixed up.

 

[luutzu]

Oh man oh man Luu .....your head is all mixed up.

I often wonder that too. Turn out I'm all alright and it's other people that's messed up

 

[noco]

Here is a list of Muslim terrorists attack in the last 30 days.

http://thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30

 

[luutzu]

Here is a list of Muslim terrorists attack in the last 30 days.

http://thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30

That's quite a detailed, and horrific, list there noco.

But it does seem to miss out the "good" kind of terrorism - anti-terrorism.

Check this link out: https://airwars.org/tag/civilian-casualties/

In Iraq and Syria alone, there's an estimated 1,000 dead civilian in March 2017 from coalition strikes. February was a lower 700.

April... There was that estimate 200 dead when coalition strike a Mosque;

There's the MOAB Trump just kinda authorised dropped "on ISIS". Killing 36 terrorists (and everything within a 1 mile radius). Probably nothing within that area though. Maybe a few birds and cactus and a goat or two.

So a MOAB is the deadliest non-nuclear weapon. This is the first time it's dropped on suspected target. Where's the outrage?

A weapon that consumes all the oxygen within its blast radius of 1.6km, turning the air to fire. I guess that's just to bring peace and democracy in a real hurry.

---------------

Check out the Korean peninsular. Might wake up tomorrow to a new war.

Let's hope the Chinese and North Korean blink first 'cause the way Trump and his generals are going, any idiot Colonel in the US military right now could start WWIII with an accidental strike.

 

[noco]

That's quite a detailed, and horrific, list there noco.

But it does seem to miss out the "good" kind of terrorism - anti-terrorism.

Check this link out: https://airwars.org/tag/civilian-casualties/

In Iraq and Syria alone, there's an estimated 1,000 dead civilian in March 2017 from coalition strikes. February was a lower 700.

April... There was that estimate 200 dead when coalition strike a Mosque;

There's the MOAB Trump just kinda authorised dropped "on ISIS". Killing 36 terrorists (and everything within a 1 mile radius). Probably nothing within that area though. Maybe a few birds and cactus and a goat or two.

So a MOAB is the deadliest non-nuclear weapon. This is the first time it's dropped on suspected target. Where's the outrage?

A weapon that consumes all the oxygen within its blast radius of 1.6km, turning the air to fire. I guess that's just to bring peace and democracy in a real hurry.

---------------

Check out the Korean peninsular. Might wake up tomorrow to a new war.

Let's hope the Chinese and North Korean blink first 'cause the way Trump and his generals are going, any idiot Colonel in the US military right now could start WWIII with an accidental strike.

Unfortunately in any wars many civilians can suffer the consequences mainly because ISIS terrorist use civilians as human shields knowing full well they will get world publicity in a similar way you are expressing yourself....Do terrorists worry about their victims whether they are civilians or not?
Of course they don't so don't talk such rot.

Would you prefer the West do nothing and let Islam take over Australia so we are compeled to live under Sharia law?.....Wake up to yourself Luu.......This movement by Islam has to be stopped.

North Korea are huffing and puffing and Trump is calling their bluff....The USA could wipe out North Korea before their long range missiles reached the shores of the USA.

 

[luutzu]

Unfortunately in any wars many civilians can suffer the consequences mainly because ISIS terrorist use civilians as human shields knowing full well they will get world publicity in a similar way you are expressing yourself....Do terrorists worry about their victims whether they are civilians or not?
Of course they don't so don't talk such rot.

Would you prefer the West do nothing and let Islam take over Australia so we are compeled to live under Sharia law?.....Wake up to yourself Luu.......This movement by Islam has to be stopped.

North Korea are huffing and puffing and Trump is calling their bluff....The USA could wipe out North Korea before their long range missiles reached the shores of the USA.

We in the West are outraged, and rightly so, when terrorists attack and kill innocent people. But... but when it's our terrorism, when we take out innocent Muslims, that's OK? That's part of war? ISIS are using them as human shields so we obviously can't have that and so take out the shields too?

Wake up to yourself noco.

It's that kind of "reasoning" that allow the slaughtering of literally millions of innocent people, so far. And nothing is being done about it.

When ISIS or some nutjob who happen to also be a Muslim commit murder, we're all upset and add it to a list of Islamic crimes. When our missile take out a Mosque, a hospital, a school... meehhhh... It's war, what can you do.

That's messed up man. You cannot justify the killing of innocent people. The moment we start doing that, we're no better than ISIS and terrorists.


The US can obviously take all of North Korea out. But can they take out China too? All of them? All before they let loose a nuke or two back at us?

Even if they didn't, or couldn't. That's freaking genocidal. But ey, Trump is great. He's a real tough guy. Dodging the Vietnam War drafts, spending his entire life screwing business partners, investors and employees... now he's a real hero because he let the generals do whatever the heck they want.

Anyway.

 

[SirRumpole]

when we take out innocent Muslims, that's OK?

Of course it's not 'OK' it's just war.

Do we have any more right to be outraged when our civilians are killed ? Probably yes, because terrorists deliberately target civilians. I don't believe our forces deliberately target civilians but instead go to pains to try to ensure that there are as few around as possible.

Of course there are mistakes. If there is negligence there is usually a court martial. Whether court martials are rigged in favour of the soldiers, who knows, it's possible. Other soldiers are the ones passing judgement.

There are no black and whites in war, just a lot of cr@p happening.

 

[luutzu]

Of course it's not 'OK' it's just war.

Do we have any more right to be outraged when our civilians are killed ? Probably yes, because terrorists deliberately target civilians. I don't believe our forces deliberately target civilians but instead go to pains to try to ensure that there are as few around as possible.

Of course there are mistakes. If there is negligence there is usually a court martial. Whether court martials are rigged in favour of the soldiers, who knows, it's possible. Other soldiers are the ones passing judgement.

There are no black and whites in war, just a lot of cr@p happening.

Do you know what's the civilian to terrorist kill ratio the US military admitted to? Under Obama?

90%. That's 9 in 10 Muslims being killed by drone strikes, by the coalition, being civilian. Had that stopped the drone programme? And this is assuming that its intended target are actual terrorist, I mean, they can't come back to tell us they're not a terrorist right?

How many Court Marshall have we heard of? The only one that come to mind was the Black Water contractors/mercenaries shooting up a few Iraqi in too public a place.

And no, we do not painstakingly try to avoid killing innocent civilian. There's a literal memo, a rule of engagement, that said it is "acceptable" to strike terrorist target if the collateral damage is "only" 25 civilians. Pretty sure it was former CIA analyst Ray McGovern who said people he know said that.

With Trump... he just removed that kind of "constraint" so it's a free for all now.

But sure, it's the fog of war; we mean well so that makes it acceptable.

Do we really "mean well" btw? I guess it just so happen that countries we decided to liberate also have oil and whose dictator aren't cooperating.