- Joined
- 17 January 2007
- Posts
- 2,986
- Reactions
- 32
Which tends to tie in the views of the gold uber-bulls, who are generally backing the barbarous relic on the back of the inevitable collapse of the US dollar. Mind you, the real doomsayers see the collapse of all fiat currency (which is all of them).
The term 'barbarous relic' was referring to the gold standard rather than gold itself.
I think the underlying force to determine wether gold is 'valued' correctly against each currency is to determine which country has been inflating their money supply more, relative to each other. It appears that at the moment the US is top of the monetary inflation stack and relative to the Euro is overvalued (still?).
The same financial structural problems also exist in all countries based on a fiat system, in some relative proportion, so there is every possibility that it will be a 'race to the bottom' of the currency depreciation race (witness Japans active currency manipulation & subsequent carry trade), in order for each country to remain globally competitive aginst the likes of China & now North Korea.
It's a case of he who inflates their money suply the least, gold will look the least attractive. Even the $A will have a blow-off top once the system re adjusts to weakening global demand due to an (peak?) oil induced global slowing (happening now, watch petrol prices), so gold in $A will resume it's march past $1000, it just may take time.