Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,401
- Reactions
- 11,795
Hi explod, This is about the post I splashed up, and the $5000 target, with no real analysis. Why is it now about you?Throughout the thread it is backed up by very many facits of informnation. I suppose what I am saying is that if one is aware that it is backed up within the document (ie. this thread) then why do we have to be pedantic on every post. I have been acused (and penalised) for being too general sometimes and being too dogmatic and pedantic at others, but when others do it is ok. I thnik to say gold is going to $5000 is ok and well backed up. When time permits I will find the references backed with the facts and post it up.
Well that was a great call on last night's price move Itha, Explod... a breakout did occur through the resistance of UF's most recently posted wedge.. afterwards gold held up comparatively well despite a heavy selloff in oil... it should be quite bullish... but there are a few things spooking me at the moment...
1. HUI and XAU were actually down 1% and 0.76% last night, respectively, despite the gold breakout and stock markets having a fair up day.
2. Oil breakdown below wedge support? chart attached. Also, last night's oil selloff occurred on high volume (not so for gold though).
3. Gold double top at 908.8 spot?
If the gold breakout turns out to be held, the wedge that SGB posted puts the next strong resistance at around 920 on the daily close for the next day or two...
Any further points/ideas about last night's action?
Cheers
Hi explod, This is about the post I splashed up, and the $5000 target, with no real analysis. Why is it now about you?If you can justify a $5000 target, great! Would help my LGL and NCM quite a bit. I'll go off now to study up about inflation. Cheers, kennas.
Hi Barrett,
Until the beginning of this week I was a WP supporter and had thought Gold would give us a descent retrace, probably not as much as WP, but a 61.8% retrace to 790-800 ,back in Aug 07, the start of the 1st leg. (original chart below, that I was working on before this weeks move. see the diff in wave count)
Which would have made logical sense because of the bullish pennant that was formed at the end of 07. But my view has changed this week because of the little run up we had in Wave C.
Now, if this is a Contracting Triangle (different setup to the wedge), it is going to be a pretty good leg up, although I would have preferred the Minor ABC correction to play out and to confirm the MAJOR 3 wave.
My view will turn bearish again though if 840 is breached.
Just my view.
SGB
wonder if there's any chance of it retracing just as quickly.
Wacked at the open. Any news? CB selling or something?
Democrats offer another bill to curb oil speculation
Monday June 23, 8:39 am ET
By David Goldman, CNNMoney.com staff writer
Congress will focus on energy speculation on Monday, as some lawmakers blamed Wall Street traders for record oil and gasoline prices.
Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., the chair of a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee, will investigate whether further regulation of trading is warranted.
On Sunday, Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama said that as president he would strengthen government oversight of energy traders. His Republican rival, Sen. John McCain, said he has supported efforts to close the "Enron loophole."
"We can eliminate a major avenue that traders use to avoid oversight," said Stupak at a press conference Friday. "It's time for Congress to close the Enron loophole and lower our gas and diesel prices by 50%
http://biz.yahoo.com/cnnm/080623/062308_energy_speculation.html."
I wonder what this "major avenue" is which causes trader "oversight"?
and excuse me, but what exactly is the "enron loophole"? It sounds like another one of those wishy-washy bureaucratic terms meaning nothing.
Whiskers said:That would be a loose, relatively unregulated electronic market place.
Thankyou.
So according to this guy(Stupak), the "unregulated" market place has caused speculators to incorrectly determine the price of crude?
So his / govt committee perception of fair value is right and everyone else (especially big nasty speculators) is wrong?
P.S. I'm not trying to start a debate here, just want some opinions (on practicality).
Wacked at the open. Any news? CB selling or something?
I wonder what this "major avenue" is which causes trader "oversight"?
So according to this guy(Stupak), the "unregulated" market place has caused speculators to incorrectly determine the price of crude?
So his / govt committee perception of fair value is right and everyone else (especially big nasty speculators) is wrong?
P.S. I'm not trying to start a debate here, just want some opinions (on practicality).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?