- Joined
- 27 April 2006
- Posts
- 1,109
- Reactions
- 4
I had held GBG since 60 cents and I just don't see much more room for additional growth. I think my money is better off elsewhere in the market at this point. I honestly don’t see GBG/SDL getting to $2 at this point. I of course could be wrong.
So far a lot of forecasters seem to have just got it wrong, zinc was forecast to be in deficit mid 2007 and so far we haven’t seen zinc stockpiles hit the bottom of that figure, they (stockpiles) came rather low in late 2006 early 2007 but then a lot of metal was dumped back onto the market suppressing prices. Nickel supplies were forecast to be in deficit for at least a year (2007) and the stockpiles are now growing. Are forecasters and analysts been perhaps a bit presumptuous for this demand?
I have been reading through a number of reports and have identified that world crude steel is declining growth is up 5.3% ytd from July compared to 12.6% at the beginning of the year.
http://www.fmgl.com.au/IRM/content/invest_brokerreports.htm
I also understand that there has been a great amount of investment on the Chinese behalf to aid in development of ore, BUT who stands to be in good stead when the market is flooded with ore and the spot price retraces…..the smelters will be! In addition to smelters any end users of the metal will benefit from a lower spot price, reductions in cost can be passed through to final consumers like any good/service. The only part of the supply chain that does not benefit from a lower spot price is the miners who are mining the iron ore.
FMG alone aim to be producing 55 million tonnes per annum from next year. They also claim that given expansion could surpass the production status of BHP.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/06/18/1954286.htm
The problem I think with iron ore seems to be how relatively easy it is to dig up and ship DSO compared to other commodities such as copper, nickel, zinc and uranium. The response time for a supply deficit for iron ore seems to be around 2 years once proving up a resource.
This article states that iron ore supplies are expected to be in deficit until 2011, at which point the supply demand equation will balance. This by coincidence is when GBG/SDL plan to begin ramping up production. My main point is many would be producers plan to be in production by this stage and the already producing BHP, RIO plan to have upgraded their production capacity by then.
So far a lot of forecasters seem to have just got it wrong, zinc was forecast to be in deficit mid 2007 and so far we haven’t seen zinc stockpiles hit the bottom of that figure, they (stockpiles) came rather low in late 2006 early 2007 but then a lot of metal was dumped back onto the market suppressing prices. Nickel supplies were forecast to be in deficit for at least a year (2007) and the stockpiles are now growing. Are forecasters and analysts been perhaps a bit presumptuous for this demand?
I have been reading through a number of reports and have identified that world crude steel is declining growth is up 5.3% ytd from July compared to 12.6% at the beginning of the year.
http://www.fmgl.com.au/IRM/content/invest_brokerreports.htm
I also understand that there has been a great amount of investment on the Chinese behalf to aid in development of ore, BUT who stands to be in good stead when the market is flooded with ore and the spot price retraces…..the smelters will be! In addition to smelters any end users of the metal will benefit from a lower spot price, reductions in cost can be passed through to final consumers like any good/service. The only part of the supply chain that does not benefit from a lower spot price is the miners who are mining the iron ore.
FMG alone aim to be producing 55 million tonnes per annum from next year. They also claim that given expansion could surpass the production status of BHP.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/06/18/1954286.htm
The problem I think with iron ore seems to be how relatively easy it is to dig up and ship DSO compared to other commodities such as copper, nickel, zinc and uranium. The response time for a supply deficit for iron ore seems to be around 2 years once proving up a resource.
This article states that iron ore supplies are expected to be in deficit until 2011, at which point the supply demand equation will balance. This by coincidence is when GBG/SDL plan to begin ramping up production. My main point is many would be producers plan to be in production by this stage and the already producing BHP, RIO plan to have upgraded their production capacity by then.