- Joined
- 8 June 2008
- Posts
- 12,451
- Reactions
- 18,112
Waking up, looking at US markets..Outch
... great stuff Duc.An article on AI: Full: https://www.honest-broker.com/p/eleven-predictions-heres-what-ai
What a crazy time to be alive.
The hot fashion trend is to forget to wear your pants. On planes, bros now stare into blank screens for the entire trip. Folks have started drinking garlic beer and eating ketchup-flavored candy bars.
Even celebrities are acting out. Italian bombshell Isabella Rossellini is now a herder on a sheep farm. Johnny Depp works as a bartender. Kanye West is communicating telepathically with car thieves.
The world has gone mad. But nothing is as crazy as the AI news.
Every day those AI bots and their human posse of true believers get wilder and bolder—and recently they’ve been flexing like body builders on Muscle Beach.
The results are sometimes hard to believe. But all this is true:
We truly live in interesting times—which is one of the three apocryphal Chinese curses.
- The movie trailer for Francis Ford Coppola’s new film got pulled from theaters because “the studio had been duped by an AI bot.”
- Just one person in North Carolina was able to steal $10 million in royalties from human musicians with AI-generated songs. They got billions of streams.
- The promoters of National Novel Writing Month angrily declared that opposition to AI books is classist and ableist.
- Children are now routinely using AI to make nude photos of other youngsters.
- Nearly half of the safety team at OpenAI left their jobs—and almost nobody seems to care or notice.
- AI tech titan Nvidia lost a half trillion in market capitalization over the course of just a few days—including the largest daily decline in the history of capitalism.
- By pure coincidence, Nvidia’s CEO sold $633 million worth of stock in the weeks leading up to the current decline.
(The other two, according to Terry Pratchett, are: “May you come to the attention of those in authority” and “May the gods give you everything you ask for.” By tradition, the last is the most dangerous of all.)
I get some credit for anticipating this. On August 4, I made the following prediction:
But it’s going to get even more interesting, and very soon. That’s because the next step in AI has arrived—the unleashing of AI agents.
And like the gods, these AI agents will give us everything we ask for.
Up until now, AI was all talk and no action. These charming bots answered your questions, and spewed out text, but were easy to ignore.
That’s now changing. AI agents will go out in the world and do things. That’s their new mission.
It’s like giving unreliable teens the keys to the family car. Up until now we’ve just had to deal with these resident deadbeats talking back, but now they are going to smash up everything in their path.
But AI agents will be even worse than the most foolhardy teen. That’s because there will be millions of these unruly bots on our digital highways.
We got a glimpse of this future last week, when the company Altera announced that it had unleashed one thousand autonomous AI agents on to a Minecraft server.
Almost immediately things got very strange.
In this AI agent community, the biggest winner was a priest, who created a huge religious cult—but by bribing people to join. In another simulation, Democrats and Republicans battled via conflicting constitutions driven by ideology (not rights, which are boring and passé in the digital world).
But it could get much worse—in an earlier simulation, AI revealed a disturbing tendency to resolve conflicts with nuclear weapons. (Don’t say I didn’t warn you.)
The Minecraft simulation also demonstrated how AI agents can change their minds at the drop of the hat—as the successful cult bribing incident suggests. In other instances, a farmer needed for the food supply decided spontaneously to give up agriculture and go on an adventure. In another instance, an entire village stopped working because of a single missing bot.
Right now this is happening in test environments. But soon AI agents will be changing the real world—and at a pace none of us are prepared for.
So let me offer eleven predictions for our interesting times. Or maybe I should call them warnings. You be the judge.
1. Stop worrying about AI taking over. It’s the people who own the AI who pose the biggest threat.
I still hear foolish predictions about some big computer taking over the world—like that scene from 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Sorry, but it won’t happen that way. Those big Sumo-sized computers aren’t the threat. It’s the people who own them you need to worry about. That’s why most of the debate about the threat coming from AI is worthless.
Yes, there is a threat. But it’s very much a human-driven one. Psychology and game theory will tell us more about how this plays out than any tech knowledge.
In fact, tech people may be the least prepared for these changes, because they’re still thinking in terms of software code, not human behavior.
2. You also have to stop thinking of AI as a single force. Hundreds of governments and corporations are already competing in building their AI empires.
AI will soon turn into a plural noun. Governments, corporations and other entities (hackers, billionaires, scammers, etc.) will each have their own AI agents—empowered by the largest computers in the history of the world, sucking up juice from the electricity grid the way Popeye swallows spinach.
3. We will soon be living in an AI war zone—because competing AI agents will constantly battle each other for control (often over us).
We will look back fondly at the simple days when the bots just talked to us. Soon they will be big and strong, and start making demands—or just do whatever they want without asking.
With so many conflicting AI programs ramping up, the bots will inevitably go to war with each other. As soon as they are given agency and responsibility, battles will ensue.
Like gunslingers in a Western town, they will shoot it out—metaphorically, and possibly in real terms.
Here’s my advice: Try not to be collateral damage.
4. Companies will launch stealth attacks on their own core talent base.
Can you imagine Hollywood studios conspiring to destroy movie stars? Or record labels putting music stars out of business? Or newspapers getting rid of all of their journalists?
It’s coming—although they can’t breathe a word of this in public…at least not yet.
View attachment 183979
Ted Gioia28 Jul
Here’s a rumor from the entertainment industry. But it should be no surprise because this has been the plan from the start.
Source: crazydaysandnights.net/2024/07/blind-it…
View attachment 183980
50
13
6
No creative professional who works for a corporation is safe. Once creative people were assets, but in the new AI economy they are just liabilities.
The recent hardball attack by Adobe on the photographers and artists who helped establish the company’s dominance is a case study in how this plays out. Be on the lookout for more battles of this sort—but with even higher stakes.
5. The bots will actually get dumber, despite trillions of dollars in investment. This huge spending actually accelerates the degradation.
The decline is already evident.
Even OpenAI admits that users will notice “tasks where the performance gets worse” in its latest generation chatbot. Many already see troubling instances of bots getting lazier and dumber. And catastrophic failures are increasingly common.
This isn’t a flaw in AI, but a limitation in the training materials. The highest quality training sources have already been exhausted—so AI is now learning from the worst possible inputs: Reddit posts, 4Chan, tweets, emails, and other garbage.
It’s going to get worse. Experts believe that AI will have used up all human-made training inputs by 2026. At that point, AI can learn from other bots, but this leads to a massive degradation in output quality.
In other words, AI will soon hit a brick wall—and face a dumbness crisis of epic proportions. That will happen around the same time that AI will have pervaded every sphere of society.
Are you worried? You should be.
6. AI will create more disruption than profit.
AI has been a lousy investment. Even before the recent sell-off, AI investment funds were losing money. And companies have learned how hard it is to generate profits from AI—or even successfully implement it in their business model.
Some experts fear that AI benefits may never justify the huge amount spent on the tech.
But companies are still spending like drunken sailors on AI baubles, despite all the disappointments. And they will be so desperate to justify this spending spree to their shareholders that they will grasp at any possible cost savings.
So I expect half-baked implementation plans—with lots of fired workers and annoyed customers. The AI situation at many companies is comparable to a Hollywood studio that has made a bunch of lousy movies that fare poorly at test screenings. They still will release them, no matter what.
That’s how companies often view sunk investments of this sort. They know they stink—but they hold their nose and dump them on the marketplace anyway.
We have at least a couple years of this stinkaroo party to look forward to, as companies make desperate moves to generate returns from AI investments. The payoff may be uncertain, but the pain is a sure thing.
7. A few real people will benefit—but (surprise!) not tech workers, who are the most vulnerable of all.
AI will replace jobs—but the first casualties will be digital workers, especially software developers. AI is most reliable in writing software code, because it is itself software code.
The more analytical and rule-based the job, the more likely that a bot will do it. But AI is clumsy in those gray areas where trade-offs can’t be quantified, so…
8. The actual winners will be holistic thinkers and empathetic individuals with human skills.
The important things in life can’t be quantified and run on a computer—I’m talking about love, care, trust, friendship, compassion, responsibility, family ties, kindness, dedication, faith, hope, courage, humility, respect, and human decency.
AI can’t deliver those. It merely pretends. And the pretending might fool some people, but feels like an insult to those who know better.
If you really want these qualities—and not a bot playing a part—you will turn to genuine human beings. And in those cases where trade-offs must be made between these human intangibles, AI is not only unreliable, but actually dangerous.
9. But these caring human agents will be vastly outnumbered by malicious and deceptive AI—which is proliferating at warp speed.
AI pollution is everywhere. Just try finding something real amid the fake images, fake articles, fake books, fake recording artists, fake videos, fake sources, fake quotes, fake people, fake facts, fake everything.
That’s why the word artificial is embedded in the very name for AI.
By the way, this pollution is an inevitable result of the dominant AI strategy which is (always) to flood the market with artificial stuff by the thousands or millions. AI is thus the opposite of the artisan, who takes care in creating each individual object.
Don’t expect this to change. So the chief beneficiaries of AI will continue to be scammers, spammers, shammers, and other purveyors of fakery—but on a much larger scale than we currently experience.
10. Even when AI can adequately handle a job, people will pay more for a human being. This will soon become a status symbol.
Here’s something you can actually measure—namely how much people will pay for the real thing.
Consider the case of laboratory-made diamonds.
View attachment 183981
Gurwinder5d
This is why AI art won't ever be as valuable as human art; people don't just buy a product, they also buy its provenance (story).
View attachment 183982
91
21
15
Even if something artificial is indistinguishable from an authentic original, consumers still want the real thing.
I could give many other examples. But here’s the bottom line: Reality is intrinsically superior to phoniness.
So I fully expect that social status will soon accrue to discerning consumers who continue to work with human beings whenever possible, and deliberately avoid AI.
I expect to be in their number. I am confident that many of you will join me.
11. AI will create an existential crisis of epic proportions, as all the dividing lines that are foundational to society—between reality and deception, truth and lies, fact and error—collapse.
This is not a small matter.
People have been warned, but they still can’t conceive how bad it’s going to get. Even their own reality as human beings will be under attack. Soon we will all be seeking personhood credentials, and forced to create “safe words” to use with family members to prove our very existence.
In the old days, existential crises were reserved for French intellectuals sitting at their Paris cafés—but now the angst will go mainstream.
Most people don’t worry a lot about the difference between truth and falsehood. They think that’s just a matter for philosophers or priests or dreamers. All they care about are results.
But those hard-headed folks (who are typically no-nonsense empiricists) will be the most shell-shocked by what’s coming down the pike. Their cherished empirical reality is about to collapse.
Most of this drama will have played out within the next 24 months. But it will be a wild ride.
In the meantime, hold on to the real. You’re going to need it—and it will be the ultimate scarce resource in the interesting days ahead.
Interesting.
View attachment 183977View attachment 183976View attachment 183975View attachment 183974View attachment 183973View attachment 183972View attachment 183971View attachment 183970
View attachment 183978
Full: https://awealthofcommonsense.com/2024/09/if-the-prices-are-wrong-you-should-be-rich/
Markets (obviously) aren't efficient. Markets are wrong often.
Who cares. The point is to get paid.
Which goes to the heart of why and how you engage with markets. Your edge. Your plan.
Your edge must start with facts. Proven facts. Here are 2 facts for you about markets:
(a) markets go up, markets go down and sometimes for a while they go nowhere; and
(b) the future is unknown.
Those 2 facts are the basis of my edge. The conclusion that I draw, which is not a fact, but rather a belief is that markets are far more random than efficient. They can go anywhere on the drop of a dime.
Therefore directional trading is a gamble.
Now you enter into the field probabilities. Read up on this. The subject is vast.
Technical analysis is at it's heart probabilities. Some has evidence that supports its application. Some does not and simply relies on luck.
Because of my 2 facts, I opted for market neutral.
Some examples: https://www.google.com/search?q=mar...me..69i57.10843j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
So why bother with charts, indicators, etc?
Because you still have to manage the trades: close, cover, sell, etc. There are better points to do this than just randomly when you feel like it. Maximum profits are at tops and bottoms of price movements. If you can pick more of these than you miss, you make lots of cash. So there is no escaping the battle against random outcomes, pick your poison(s). Hence my broad interest in macro, fundamentals and charts.
jog on
duc
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/486a8a49-7732-4159-a113-c7cc9dc425fb_363x270.gif
Nah, they will not be able to read more than 3 words in a row let alone a sentence and by that time all the books will have been doctored or abridged ..digital only... great stuff Duc.
Re the AI and the net etc...and so one day they, the masses, returned to a thing called "a library".
AgreeNah, they will not be able to read more than 3 words in a row let alone a sentence and by that time all the books will have been doctored or abridged ..digital only
Just need a pretext to discard paper editions: illness, whale strangling on a second hand floating Morisset paperback...
The interesting bit is the ai self feeding on own ai generated data for training and getting rubbish
The loop does not work....
computers tend to malfunction at much lower temperatures than thatAgree
Interesting 10 years coming up
Burn the computers
Farenheit 452
Did you hear about the massive top in Semiconductors? Everyone is talking about it on the internets. So it must be true. Seems the easy call here to make is to say "that was it". The Semiconductor story and the bull market as we know it is over...' |
After Covid there was no sector that did better than Consumer Discretionary stocks. Locking everyone down and sending them all a check to go spend, as it turns out, was great for the Consumer Discretionary sector. And then 2021 ended and the correction in Consumer began... Years in the making, here is the massive top in Consumer Discretionary relative to the S&P500 that's got people talking... |
Or is it that the Consumer stocks are just finding support once again where they did a decade ago? Is the squeeze now ready to get going? It's interesting that Chip Stocks find themselves in a very similar position. See: Head & Shoulders Top In Semiconductors But don't lose sight on what's happening in Consumer Discretionary right now. With lower lows in the relative price chart, you're seeing a series of higher lows in momentum. Here's the weekly chart showing exactly that from a longer-term perspective: |
And it's not just the longer-term. You're seeing it on multiple timeframes. Here's the daily plot showing the exact same thing... |
If this is the massive top in Discretionary that's going to bring down the whole market, you're going to see it in its largest components: Amazon, Tesla and Home Depot, which combined represent almost half the entire sector index. But is a massive top in the consumer the bet you want to make in the middle of a bull market? Or is this not the middle and the bull market is already over? Which are you betting on? Personally, I'm not convinced that these are tops. I'm not convinced that the bull market is over. I'm not convinced that these are all about to collapse. The reason is because we've yet to see any evidence that would suggest this is going to happen. Where is the expansion in stocks making new lows? Why do they keep digging in and buying them up when they need to? Call me when we actually see breakdowns. Call me when we see these "massive tops" actually being completed. Then we'll act accordingly. But we haven't seen it yet. |
Ha, you rogue. I'm currently long AVGO after being short pre-earnings. Looks like I'll be selling my longs to you then, tonight perhaps.
Got the oil low, finally. It took two parcels as the POO went a little lower than anticipated. Hoping it can make it back to $72/bbl (WTI that is).
All is good, in this BTD camp.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.