He notes correctly that higher fuel prices are not driven by the Ukraine war but then goes on to say it's driven by the sanctions.THE UK IS IN DEEP TROUBLE!
Sending less of the grain and soybeans we produce to factory farms would also help increase food security.There is no food scarcity, in first world countries.
It is the poor nations that suffer from first world inflation and demand.
"The US Treasury last month convened a meeting with multilateral institutions to discuss measures to tackle rising food insecurity. Among its own initiatives, the US has allocated new global emergency food assistance bringing the total since February to nearly $2.6bn. It is also looking to mitigate the global fertiliser shortage by boosting domestic production of crop nutrients through a $500mn US Department of Agriculture programme."
World’s poorest nations to receive aid amid soaring food prices
i have a substantial packet of these in the discretionary portfolio:+1.52% today so farNoticed huge volume went into the Betashares Global Agriculture ETF ( FOOD) today.
Over 1 million shares exchanged. Is it a buy or a sell?
i have seen some saying we shouldn't be eating soy at all , so maybe we should be planting more ( normal ) beans and peas are returning nutrients to the soilSending less of the grain and soybeans we produce to factory farms would also help increase food security.
It’s a crazy fact that only 6% of soybeans grown are eaten by humans directly, the majority are fed to animals in factory farms and feed lots. It’s a similar story with wheat, corn, rice and other crops, animals in factory farms also consume a large chunk of the fish caught.
If we collectively ate less meat, there would be lower food prices, and no food insecurity.
Most of the anti soy stuff has been debunked, but of course the farmers could plant other crops in their place if the demand changed.i have seen some saying we shouldn't be eating soy at all , so maybe we should be planting more ( normal ) beans and peas are returning nutrients to the soil
Most of the anti soy stuff has been debunked, but of course the farmers could plant other crops in their place if the demand changed.
Basically a lot of the Anti soy stuff goes back to outdated studies from the 80’s that were based on force feeding mice soy protein which it turns out doesn’t related to humans and were in amounts that no human would ever eat anyway.
Also, there were concerns that the phyto-esterogen in soy would have an adverse affect on Males, but it turns out it does act the same way as Mammal Estero hen and actually has health benefits, where as the Mammal esteogen humans consume in meat and milk from female cows is more dangerous if you are worried about estrogen in take.
I guess people can be allergic to anything, I mean some people can die from the smell of a peanut, but for the rest of us there’s no need to avoid soy or peanuts, in general unless you have an allergy both are pretty healthy.well my gut doesn't like soy ( not even the sauce ) and there was a Japanese professor who gave strong warnings on Monsanto's GM soy
feel free to grab my share ( of soy )
just seems to sit in my gut , whether soy milk ( or something with soy milk powder included ) and of course the other easy spot soy products )I guess people can be allergic to anything, I mean some people can die from the smell of a peanut, but for the rest of us there’s no need to avoid soy or peanuts, in general unless you have an allergy both are pretty healthy.
I will definitely take your share, I love Korean BBQ Tofu
Most of the anti soy stuff has been debunked, but of course the farmers could plant other crops in their place if the demand changed.
Basically a lot of the Anti soy stuff goes back to outdated studies from the 80’s that were based on force feeding mice soy protein which it turns out doesn’t related to humans and were in amounts that no human would ever eat anyway.
Also, there were concerns that the phyto-esterogen in soy would have an adverse affect on Males, but it turns out it does act the same way as Mammal Estero hen and actually has health benefits, where as the Mammal esteogen humans consume in meat and milk from female cows is more dangerous if you are worried about estrogen in take.
The science is pretty clear, take a look into it and you will see that most of the negative claims come from a handful of botched studies back in the 80’s that articles just kept repeating for years, but they have since proven to be negative.The science isn't clear I thought. There's studies either way.
The diary industry needs you to eat dairy, the soybean industry needs you to eat chickens and pigs.Here's another article on Soy.
Straight Talk About Soy
The Takeaway: Soy is a unique food that is widely studied for its estrogenic and anti-estrogenic effects on the body. Studies may seem to present conflicting conclusions about soy, but this is larg…www.hsph.harvard.edu
The thing is both dairy and soybeans are huge industries competing with each other, therefore studies do have a vested interest in the result depending on who is funding it. There also seems to be a political angle to it, which is curious.
That leaves us to interpret the science as best as we can. Additionally I would posit that manboobery might have other factors involved rather that strictly dairy or soy.
I don't shun either but also don't consume much of either.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.