Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

February 2025

Joined
13 February 2006
Posts
5,169
Reactions
11,851
So we close off January and start Feb.

Tariffs:

New data today gives the best snapshot yet of where economic conditions stand before a potential continentwide trade war.

Why it matters: If tariffs prove disruptive to growth, the U.S. is starting from a position of strength — unlike other major economies — which might cushion the blow of tariffs better than otherwise would have been the case.

  • The risk, however, is an interruption of Americans' economic gains in recent years, while making inflation a longer-term feature of the economy.
Driving the news: The latest economic data supports the narrative that the economy came into 2025 with momentum. But inflation still looked sticky, as previewed in yesterday's GDP report — a concern for the many economists who believe tariffs will make above-normal price pressures harder to beat.

  • For the third month, the core Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index — which strips out food and energy prices and is closely monitored by the Federal Reserve — didn't budge.
  • It rose 2.8% in the 12 months through December, above the Fed's 2% target.
  • By a different measure, however, inflation looks more benign: Core PCE rose 2.2% on an annualized basis in the previous three months, down from 2.6% in November.
Between the lines: Consumer spending was solid, rising 0.7% in December, or 0.4% in real terms.

  • Still, that jump outpaced the rise in incomes: The personal saving rate was 3.8%, down 0.3 percentage point from November and the lowest level in two years.
Flashback: Fed officials were focused on preserving economic growth during the Trump 1.0 trade wars. This time, the economy is holding up, even under the weight of higher interest rates. There is also a new variable: too-high inflation.

  • Fed chair Jerome Powell said at a news conference earlier this week that might play a role in how tariffs land on the economy and whether they result in price hikes.
What they're saying: "We've just come through a high inflation period, and you can argue that both ways: you can say that companies have figured out that they do like to raise prices — but we also hear a lot from companies these days that consumers have really had it with price increases," Powell said.

  • "There are lots of places where that price increase from the tariff can show up between the manufacturer and the consumer," he added. "Just so many variables."
The intrigue: In a speech this morning, Fed governor Michelle Bowman did not mention Trump's trade threat. But she did warn about upside risks to inflation, noting that global supply chains remain "susceptible to disruption."

  • Bowman raised the possibility that interest rates might not be high enough to restrict the economy and cool inflation.
  • "In light of the ongoing strength in the economy and with equity prices substantially higher than a year ago, it seems unlikely that the overall level of interest rates and borrowing costs are exerting meaningful restraint," Bowman said.
What to watch: Trump is threatening to impose tariffs on a wide scale tomorrow, another key difference between his first White House stint.

  • Trump told reporters in the Oval Office yesterday that he plans to move forward with 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada. It's unclear whether they will go into effect right away or exclude any imports.
  • Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the nation will hit back.
The bottom line: Trump is at the helm of a different economy now. If his trade threats do materialize, the effects are unpredictable.


Screen Shot 2025-02-01 at 8.21.47 AM.pngScreen Shot 2025-02-01 at 8.22.41 AM.png

On yesterday's GDP number:

Screen Shot 2025-02-01 at 8.22.16 AM.png

LOL. Strongest economy ever.


Oil:

Oil prices are set to finish this week some $2 per barrel lower than a week ago as the January ICE Brent futures contract expires just below $77 per barrel. However, the second straight weekly decline could be cut short very quickly if Donald Trump’s February 1 deadline for Canada and Mexico leads to the US slapping punitive 25% sanctions. If the threat does become a reality, the oil bulls will not stop until Brent is back above $80 per barrel.

Former IEA Employees Turn Against It. Just as the International Energy Agency came under severe criticism from Donald Trump due to its marked focus on climate change, a new report penned by the IEA’s former head of analysis identified 23 false assumptions in the organization’s peak-demand scenarios.

Investments into Clean Energy Hit New Record. According to BloombergNEF, global investment in low-carbon energy reached $2.1 trillion for the first time on record in 2024, but the 11% year-over-year growth is slower than 25% previously and only 37% of what is required to meet net zero emissions by 2050.

Coffee Is The New Cocoa of 2025. Prices of arabica coffee continued to hit record highs this week as front-month ICE futures hit $3.74 per pound on Thursday, on the back of drought-hit tight supplies from Brazil and low coffee bean inventories from top roasters such as Nestle (SWX:NESN) or JDE Peet’s.

UK Says No to Oil Development. The Scottish Court of Sessions ruled that government approval for the Rosebank oil field and Jackdaw gas field was unlawful as it did not take into consideration Scope 3 emissions, indefinitely blocking the United Kingdom’s two largest oil and gas projects.

Ukraine Claims Huge Hit on Russian Refinery. Ukraine’s military struck Russia’s fourth largest refinery in Nizhny Novgorod in an overnight drone attack, causing a large fire and halting operations at the 340,000 b/d refinery’s integrated petrochemical plant, allegedly also attempting a drone strike on a nuclear reactor.

Japan Eyes Alaska LNG to Appease Trump. Japan is mulling support for the $44 billion Alaska LNG project in order to forestall potential trade friction with the United States, eyeing liquefied gas supplies from the port of Nikiski that would be connected to gas fields in the north of Alaska via an 800-mile pipeline.

Appetite for Wind Energy Has Never Been Thinner. UK-based energy major Shell (LON:SHEL) reported a $1 billion write-down on its sole remaining offshore wind energy venture, the Atlantic Shores project jointly developed with EDF Renewables, eyeing 2.8 GW of generation capacity in offshore New Jersey.

Iraq Claims Huge Flaring Breakthrough. Historically one of the worst flarers globally, Iraq claims to have cut the amount of natural gas it releases by 70% after partnering with TotalEnergies and Baker Hughes, with 2023 flare volumes as high as 637 BCf and almost identical to the country’s gas consumption.

Trump Cabinet Moves to Repeal Biden Fuel Standards. The new US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy directed US regulators to rescind President Biden’s landmark fuel economy standards, hiking CAFE requirements for light-duty vehicles to 50.4 miles per gallon by 2031 from 39.1 miles per gallon now.

Kazakhstan Sticks to OPEC+ Balancing Act. Under pressure from Chevron (NYSE:CVX) ramping up production at its giant Tengiz field to 800,000 b/d, the government of Kazakhstan claimed it would make a final decision on OPEC+ production cut compliance after the next joint OPEC+ meeting in June.

US Oil Majors Double Down on Gas Generation. US oil major Chevron (NYSE:CVX) announced it plans to build natural gas-fuelled power plants next to data centers in the US Southeast, Midwest and East, partnering with investment firm Engine 1 and using gas turbines made by GE Vernova (NYSE:GEV).

Norway’s Government Collapses over Clean Energy. Norway’s government has collapsed after the ruling Labour Party pushed to implement EU clean energy directives, only to see the Centre Party pull out of the coalition and 8 out of 20 government ministers resign, including the finance and defense ministers.

Calcasieu Pass LNG to Start in March. According to US energy regulator FERC, the remaining construction work at Venture Global’s (NYSE:VG) 12.4 mtpa Calcasieu Pass LNG facility will be finalized by the end of February, paving the way for a full start of operations after a two-year regulatory limbo.

European Banks:

No matter how they try, sometimes central bankers can’t avoid creating an event. That’s what just happened to the European Central Bank, which announced a 25-basis-point cut in its policy rate Thursday, as was universally expected. President Christine Lagarde studiously declined to create news during her press conference. But the announcement came on a morning that also saw utterly lackluster GDP numbers in Germany and the euro zone. There are worries about the fiscal deficits in several European countries, led by France, which would normally push yields upward. But slow growth has convinced investors that the ECB is going to have to keep cutting, and so yields took a tumble:

-1x-1.jpg
If sentiment moved toward more rate cuts on the day, however, that is against the direction of travel this month. On Dec. 31, there was some confidence that the ECB’s policy rate would be below 2% by the year’s end. Now, it’s seen as unlikely to go beyond that level:

-1x-1.jpg
In part, this reflects the global trend. Ever since last October, when markets grew confident that Donald Trump would return to the White House, yields in the US have risen far faster. That in turn puts more pressure on the euro. Last September, the consensus was that the fed funds rate would be one percentage point above that of the ECB by the middle of this year. That has now risen to two percentage points:

-1x-1.jpg
The critical question now is to identify the neutral rate, known in the jargon as r*, at which policy is neither restrictive nor accommodative. Lagarde said that ECB monetary policy remained restrictive, but Alberto Gallo, chief investment officer of Andromeda Capital Management in London, listed a series of metrics that suggest conditions are already easy. The ECB’s own quarterly survey of bank lending officers, published earlier this week, suggests as much. Bloomberg Economics’ composite measure of the 12 components in the survey, which is positive when conditions are easy and negative when they are tighter, shows that banks grew more conservative during the last quarter in response to the growing political uncertainty around Trump 2.0. But conditions in the banking system — more important in Europe than in the US where many companies rely on bond finance — remain looser than for most of the time since the Global Financial Crisis began in 2007:

-1x-1.jpg
Bond finance also suggests that conditions are easy. The spread on European corporate debt compared to equivalent Treasuries is now, according to Bloomberg indexes, at its lowest since 2021, when the major central banks started hiking:

-1x-1.jpg
Another sign of growing resilience comes from banking stocks. Brutalized by the GFC and by the euro-zone sovereign debt crisis that followed, they remain far below their highs. But they are on a good run, and are now at their highest since 2012. The region looks far more resilient against a crisis than it did then, even if it’s hard to get excited about growth. Conditions don’t look tight:

-1x-1.jpg
After the market closed, Bloomberg published a story sourced to ECB officials, saying that the central bank was ready to admit that conditions were no longer restrictive at its next meeting in March. But Davide Oneglia of TS Lombard suggests that the arguments over the neutral rate were a distraction:

Lagarde also made a key point that is always lost on pundits but strengthens our view that this whole r-star debate is mostly a smokescreen: Any estimate of the neutral rate is not “a destination” for rates. The real debate remains if the ECB should turn accommodative and fine-tuning is hard.
Increasingly, market players believe the slow economy and falling inflation will leave the central bank with no alternative but to cut well below neutral. That will ultimately be good for European risk assets. Oneglia suggests that the ECB should call the recent rise in long-term real yields an “unwarranted, US-driven tightening” of euro-zone financial conditions. If it’s squeamish about cutting rates below neutral, it can always blame the US.


TSLA

Today's Chart of the Day was shared by Ricardo Sarraf (@nullcharts).

  • Tesla Inc. ($TSLA) rose +2.9% today despite missing earnings estimates last night. It traded lower at one point this morning before reversing higher and closing above $400.
  • The stock emerged from a three-year base in December after clearing its 2021 peak at $400. Since then, it has coiled into a Triangle pattern, setting the stage for a large move in the coming weeks.
  • If $TSLA resolves higher from this consolidation pattern, the next upside target is $600, representing the 161.8% Fibonacci extension of the base.
The Takeaway: Tesla ($TSLA) refused to break down today despite missing earnings. If the stock continues to respect $400, it could rally +50% to $600 in the coming months.

META

he year ahead for MetaMETA $690.78 (0.55%) is all about AI. But the year after that will be all about monetizing it.

The company is currently training Llama 4, the next iteration of its large language model, which it expects to release this year. Even though Llama is a free, open-source product, it sits right at the center of Meta’s plans for growth.

Unlike its competitors in the AI horserace, like OpenAI and Anthropic, Meta can pour tens of billions of profits from its other businesses into this effort (and the infrastructure needed to run it), and has lots of ways that it can turn the free product into a revenue firehose.

On yesterday’s Q4 earnings call, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said:

“We have a really exciting roadmap for this year with a unique vision focused on personalization. We believe that people don’t all want to use the same AI — people want their AI to be personalized to their context, their interests, their personality, their culture, and how they think about the world.”
Anytime you hear the word “personalization” in a Big Tech product, that means it will be used for ads. None of the big AI players have integrated ads into their chatbot products, but if anyone is prepared for this, it’s Meta.

Meta is an advertising company, after all. For all of FY 2024, the company pulled in over $160 billion in ad revenue, growing 21% year over year.


Zuckerberg regularly says that Meta’s pattern is to grow a product to 1 billion users, then monetize:

“We try to scale them to reach usually a billion people or more. And it’s at that point once they’re at scale that we really start focusing on monetization. So sometimes we’ll experiment with monetization before — we’re running some experiments with Threads now for example.”
But Zuckerberg cautioned that the “actual business opportunity for Meta AI and AI Studio and business agents and people interacting with these AIs” won’t show up until after 2025.

And if Meta’s plans for monetizing AI look anything like its current ad business, you might not even have to use Meta’s chatbot to help fuel the new business.

The Meta tracking “pixel” has turned billions of internet users into targets for Meta advertising, even if they aren’t users of Meta platforms. The Meta pixel has become such a built-in default on billions of websites that it has caused sensitive data collection from suicide hotlines, hospitals, tax-filing companies, and federal student loan providers. Dozens of lawsuits have been filed due to the ad technology’s misuse.

Nobody really knows exactly how the “personalization” of AI services will be monetized, but after spending hundreds of billions to build all this fancy, city-sized AI infrastructure, you better believe they will want a return on their investment.


Screen Shot 2025-02-01 at 8.53.55 AM.png

January:

Screen Shot 2025-02-01 at 9.04.49 AM.pngScreen Shot 2025-02-01 at 9.05.09 AM.pngScreen Shot 2025-02-01 at 9.07.11 AM.pngScreen Shot 2025-02-01 at 9.08.43 AM.png

1 day (top)
1 month (below)

Screen Shot 2025-02-01 at 9.10.53 AM.png


jog on
duc
 
  • The S&P 500 fell -1.0% this week. However, it still closed at all-time highs on a monthly basis, rising +2.7% in January.
  • Steve points out that $SPX had a Bullish Outside Reversal Month, meaning January's highs and lows exceeded the prior month's range.
  • There have only been eight prior instances since inception, but forward returns have historically been strong. February has been positive 86% of the time, for an average gain of +2.2%, and the next 8-12 months have never closed lower.
The Takeaway: Despite breaking the prior month's low at one point, the S&P 500 closed at all-time highs on a monthly basis, rising +2.7% in January. A Bullish Outside Reversal in January has historically been a positive sign for the rest of the year.


Screen Shot 2025-02-02 at 7.24.08 AM.pngScreen Shot 2025-02-02 at 7.24.37 AM.pngScreen Shot 2025-02-01 at 8.26.37 PM.pngScreen Shot 2025-02-02 at 7.25.10 AM.pngScreen Shot 2025-02-02 at 7.29.23 AM.pngScreen Shot 2025-02-01 at 10.34.13 AM.png


Trump and Tariffs:

Screen Shot 2025-02-02 at 7.47.50 AM.pngScreen Shot 2025-02-02 at 7.48.04 AM.png


With Election Day around the corner, Trump talked about his interest in ending the federal income tax in two high-profile interviews this week, harking back to the late 19th century, when the US relied on tariffs to fund federal spending.


The former president has vowed to broadly impose tariffs, arguing they can generate trillions of dollars in revenue.


Speaking with barbers in the Bronx, New York, in a segment aired on Fox News on Monday, Trump said, “There is a way, if what I’m planning comes out.”


“When we were a smart country, in the 1890s … this is when the country was relatively the richest it ever was. It had all tariffs. It didn’t have an income tax,” Trump said after a barber asked whether it would be possible to jettison the federal income tax. “Now we have income taxes, and we have people that are dying. They’re paying tax, and they don’t have the money to pay the tax.”


A few days later, podcaster Joe Rogan asked Trump whether he was serious about replacing federal income taxes with tariffs. “Yeah, sure, why not?” Trump said during his interview Friday
on “The Joe Rogan Experience.”


Trump, who also floated the idea of ending the federal income tax in June, has not said whether he would eliminate federal corporate income and payroll taxes or just the individual income tax — which raises about half of the nearly $5 trillion in revenue that the federal government collects.

Full:https://edition.cnn.com/2024/10/26/politics/trump-income-taxes-tariffs/index.html


Bessent:

Full:https://www.ft.com/content/7fb420b9-1bd1-4c68-8575-94e99315051c


Donald Trump’s Treasury secretary Scott Bessent is pushing for new universal tariffs on US imports to start at 2.5 per cent and rise gradually, said four people familiar with the proposal.


The 2.5 per cent levy would move higher by the same amount each month, the people familiar with it said, giving businesses time to adjust and countries the chance to negotiate with the US president’s administration. The levies could be pushed up to as high as 20 per cent — in line with Trump’s maximalist position on the campaign trail last year.


But a gradual introduction would be more moderate than the immediate action some countries feared. The proposal by Bessent comes as Trump’s team debates how to implement tariff plans, with the president escalating his tariff rhetoric on Monday in a speech in Florida, threatening more duties on semiconductors, metals and pharmaceutical goods. “We have to bring production back to our country,” Trump said.


This is a FUNDAMENTAL restructuring of the US economy.

How it has been since 1971

Screen Shot 2025-02-02 at 7.52.17 AM.png

To what Trump envisions:

Screen Shot 2025-02-02 at 7.52.29 AM.png

I know it's history, but it's kinda genius if they can pull it off.

The caveat is that the US is no longer the largest consumer economy. China is right up there. However, that being said, if your income tax as an individual is cut by 30% or more, you will probably consume more (Keynes and his MPC).

Of course, investment to manufacture in US gets a boost as what is manufactured in US is tariff exempt.


Screen Shot 2025-02-02 at 8.00.20 AM.png

Longer term, if this works, gotta be a buy today. It's provided a little pullback for entry.


jog on
duc
 
Trump has hit Canada and Mexico with 25% tariffs and 10% on China. You can read about it on CNBC and CNN.

Being waiting almost 1 hour for a news conference from Canada to start to see their response. The Canadians are taking them time. No news from Mexico yet. Trump is threatening even higher tariffs if they retialate.
 
Trump has hit Canada and Mexico with 25% tariffs and 10% on China. You can read about it on CNBC and CNN.

Being waiting almost 1 hour for a news conference from Canada to start to see their response. The Canadians are taking them time. No news from Mexico yet. Trump is threatening even higher tariffs if they retialate.
Now the news conference from Canada has been delayed until 12.30 pm our time
 
Trump has hit Canada and Mexico with 25% tariffs and 10% on China. You can read about it on CNBC and CNN.

Being waiting almost 1 hour for a news conference from Canada to start to see their response. The Canadians are taking them time. No news from Mexico yet. Trump is threatening even higher tariffs if they retialate.
awesome nothing like a tariff war between 'allies ' to help lower share prices ( in areas i am interested in )

this should be very educational , from example Canada could limit exports of heavy oil ( suitable for bitumen and diesel ) , grains , lumber and maple syrup

now Mexico could limit exports of silver, gold , copper , the parts for wind turbines .. and several other manufactured goods
 
Trump has hit Canada and Mexico with 25% tariffs and 10% on China. You can read about it on CNBC and CNN.

Being waiting almost 1 hour for a news conference from Canada to start to see their response. The Canadians are taking them time. No news from Mexico yet. Trump is threatening even higher tariffs if they retialate.
Both Canada and Mexico are in the same situation as Australia vs China.
If China tomorrow announces 25% tariff, what would we do past the gesticulation.. nothing
Ohh actually China did already😊and our response?😂
Canada is a twin to Australia, might do them good to invest in more than RE and immigration actually.
The last article of Mr Duc is quite clear as to how and why.
It is a daring economic attempt but noone can seriously pretend that the current status quo is working.
In an age with ai, automation and robots, outsourcing manufacturing due to worker shortage is not a good pretext and the US along Russia and China are the only one who could have a chance of success moving toward self sufficiency.
EU, Australia could physically but too destroyed economically/ politically.
I still doubt the US move will be enough to solve their debt issue, nor that anyone/any policy could...
But the market will jitter that is for sure..high volatility ahead based on news conferences
 
Both Canada and Mexico are in the same situation as Australia vs China.
If China tomorrow announces 25% tariff, what would we do past the gesticulation.. nothing
Ohh actually China did already😊and our response?😂
Canada is a twin to Australia, might do them good to invest in more than RE and immigration actually.
The last article of Mr Duc is quite clear as to how and why.
It is a daring economic attempt but noone can seriously pretend that the current status quo is working.
In an age with ai, automation and robots, outsourcing manufacturing due to worker shortage is not a good pretext and the US along Russia and China are the only one who could have a chance of success moving toward self sufficiency.
EU, Australia could physically but too destroyed economically/ politically.
I still doubt the US move will be enough to solve their debt issue, nor that anyone/any policy could...
But the market will jitter that is for sure..high volatility ahead based on news conferences
self-sufficiency depends on what level of sophistication desired

the Amish for instance are close to self-sufficiency using very few outside resources

the BIG difference is several nations dream of fighting over residency on Mars ( and the Moon )
 
Still waiting

Not much of a press conference so far.
View attachment 192436
well Justin and crew spat in the face of Xi and ranted on about Putin , the very two who have plenty of experience handling sanctions and tariffs .

talk about burning bridges behind you LOL

now MEXICO still has friends in Latin America and that might be the golden lining ( Mexico a while back was talking about a Lat-am bloc similar to a mini BRICS )
 
Justin is a WEF stooge, Macron is the EU parallel, both worst globalist corporate stalinists
Based on France recent history, i think both Canada and France voters get what they deserve, electors knew, they voted,let them pay for their socialism utopia wo borders.
Both Macron and Trudeau were deep into Trump bashing, Colombia is a leftist government , first in years as is Mexico.
I would be disappointed if Trump was showing any mercy there
Let him work for American voters, not the wef globalist clique.
We will hurt too in Australia
Now what will the Soros team do to fight back, as they will...
It is usually dirty, faceless and with no care of collateral casualties.
May Justin speak:😊
 
CNN are reporting that both Canada and Mexico have retailed with 25% tariffs against the US. Mexico made the announcement 40 minutes ago. Game ON! The Canadians and Mexicans have guts taking Trump on unlike Colombia.
 
Top