- Joined
- 6 January 2009
- Posts
- 2,300
- Reactions
- 1,130
Show me the evidence, over 35 courts have shown there is none. But keep believing, pray to the sun, the god, someone.
Show me the evidence, over 35 courts have shown there is none. But keep believing, pray to the sun, the god, someone.Oh Gawd!
That's how the court process works, people show the evidence and the court decides whether the evidence is valid or not.
Once again, decision made, all done, result.
But the process has to be gone through once it is initiated.
Have you never been involved in a civil suit?
Interesting. The evidence is growing.
Umm if you read my post you will see that I said that I have said that there wasn't any evidence that I have seen to claim widespread fraud during the election. A lot of allegations, but I haven't seen anything that would make me think it would overturn the election.Last i checked Biden is not president, when and if he is, I will apply the same rules as I apply to Chump in Chief. SIMPLE
You don't like being called out, SHOW ME SOME CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF SYSTEMATIC FRAUD that will stand up in court.
"Which 2 Quotes"? You make/cast aspersions against other posters with gross generalizations.
Umm if you read my post you will see that I said that I have said that there wasn't any evidence that I have seen to claim widespread fraud during the election. A lot of allegations, but I haven't seen anything that would make me think it would overturn the election.
At least read what I said before shooting off. I said ballot harvesting which you obviously don't know what it is, so not wasting time on that one.
I "quoted your and bas name.
I love being called out.
You do know that affidavits are considered ‘evidence’ in a court case.Nice, we finally agree.
You believe in Chump man, the election was fraudulent, but cannot show any evidence.
My defense of what?How many court cases have proceeded, how simple is this stuff.
Show me the evidence, actually show me a court case resolution in your defense.
Affidavits, they have work in Chump cases
That is an excellent summary. Spot on.Excellent summary.
That is an excellent summary. Spot on.
I'm guessing its back to climate shilling.Good to see a bit of honesty in the media, it happens occasionally.
From the article:CNN and MSNBC are fretting over post-Trump future
They thrived during the Trump years as they devoted countless prime-time hours to criticising a White House antagonist that their viewers just could not quit. Now faced with a Trump-less future, they are scrambling for answers.www.smh.com.au
CNN and MSNBC thrived during the Trump years, reaching new heights in ratings and revenue while devoting countless prime-time hours to criticising a White House antagonist that their viewers just could not quit.
Now faced with a Trump-less future, top executives at the rival cable news networks have summoned star anchors and producers to private meetings in recent weeks, seeking answers to a pressing question: What's next?
Yes the chooks will still need feeding, I guess we will have to wait and see what the media feeds up to the muppets next.
Stay tuned for "ranters and chanters", the next soapy.
Interspersed with anti ScoMo and Boris Johnson rhetoric, ah something different to look forward to, only let down by its predictability.I'm guessing its back to climate shilling.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?