Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Fake news and its effect on the community

Oh Gawd!

That's how the court process works, people show the evidence and the court decides whether the evidence is valid or not.

Once again, decision made, all done, result.

But the process has to be gone through once it is initiated.

Have you never been involved in a civil suit?
Show me the evidence, over 35 courts have shown there is none. But keep believing, pray to the sun, the god, someone.
 
Last i checked Biden is not president, when and if he is, I will apply the same rules as I apply to Chump in Chief. SIMPLE

You don't like being called out, SHOW ME SOME CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF SYSTEMATIC FRAUD that will stand up in court.

"Which 2 Quotes"? You make/cast aspersions against other posters with gross generalizations.
Umm if you read my post you will see that I said that I have said that there wasn't any evidence that I have seen to claim widespread fraud during the election. A lot of allegations, but I haven't seen anything that would make me think it would overturn the election.
At least read what I said before shooting off. I said ballot harvesting which you obviously don't know what it is, so not wasting time on that one.

I "quoted your and bas name.

I love being called out.
 
Umm if you read my post you will see that I said that I have said that there wasn't any evidence that I have seen to claim widespread fraud during the election. A lot of allegations, but I haven't seen anything that would make me think it would overturn the election.
At least read what I said before shooting off. I said ballot harvesting which you obviously don't know what it is, so not wasting time on that one.

I "quoted your and bas name.

I love being called out.

Nice, we finally agree.

You believe in Chump man, the election was fraudulent, but cannot show any evidence.
 
How many court cases have proceeded, how simple is this stuff.

Show me the evidence, actually show me a court case resolution in your defense.

Affidavits, they have work in Chump cases
 
The Georgian Secretary of State made it crystal clear that he would very vigourous in tackling voter fraud in the critical run off election for 2 Senate seats.
He particularly gave warning about efforts to register out of State citizens in Georgia. Excellent.

Kept his word. First cab off the rank for prosecution.


For anyone interested this website keeps an up to date account of the flurry of law suits currently in play around the election and associated parties.
 
This is probably a reasonable example, of what I have been mentioning, about who owns the media. It is good to see they have sorted it out, I think quotes were used in our corona virus thread, which is to be expected after all it is in the newspaper. :rolleyes:
From the article:

Nine Newspapers has quietly stopped running a monthly paid insert that had been criticised as Chinese Communist Party “propaganda”.

The eight-page “China Watch” liftout, produced by the CCP’s official English-language mouthpiece China Daily, had been published each month in The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Australian Financial Review, as part of a deal struck under previous owners Fairfax Media in 2016.
Nine Newspapers had decided not to renew the lucrative contract six months ago, following similar decisions by media organisations around the world as the COVID-19 pandemic hit, including the UK’s Daily Telegraph in April.

Uhlmann told The Australian newspaper at the time that the insert was “extremely disturbing”.

“Since the moment the decision was made (in 2016) to have the China Daily insert in The Sydney Morning Herald, I’ve made it clear that I’ve found it an extremely disturbing development that Communist Party propaganda has the apparent endorsement of an Australian media organisation,” he said.

“I said that before I joined Nine and I haven’t changed my opinion.”

The China Watch liftout heavily promoted the Chinese government.

In February, one story headlined “China’s fight to contain virus wins wide acclaim” praised the Chinese government’s COVID-19 responses. “China has taken the most comprehensive and rigorous containment and mitigation measures, and many go well beyond the requirements of the International Health Regulations,” it said.
According to The Guardian, when Fairfax Media began carrying the liftout in 2016, the company justified the move by saying it was commercial printing arrangement for revenue and noted other newspapers around the world also carried it, including The Washington Post and Le Figaro.
The liftout included the disclaimer that “this supplement, prepared by China Daily, People’s Republic of China, did not involve the news or editorial departments of The Sydney Morning Herald”.

The China Watch liftout heavily promoted the Chinese government
.
 
Last edited:
I understand their concern, but really is that true, or is that journalistic license.
Could they be sued if Australia does reduce their emissions to 0, and the islands still go under. Interesting question.
THE HEADLINE "FIJI WARNS AUSTRALIA MUST ACHIEVE 0 EMISSIONS BY 2050 OR LOSE PACIFIC ISLANDS"
Well what if Australia does achieve it and the Pacific Islands still disappear, does that mean that some one can be held responsible for misleading information.

 
Good to see a bit of honesty in the media, it happens occasionally. :D

From the article:

CNN and MSNBC thrived during the Trump years, reaching new heights in ratings and revenue while devoting countless prime-time hours to criticising a White House antagonist that their viewers just could not quit.

Now faced with a Trump-less future, top executives at the rival cable news networks have summoned star anchors and producers to private meetings in recent weeks, seeking answers to a pressing question: What's nex
t?

Yes the chooks will still need feeding, I guess we will have to wait and see what the media feeds up to the muppets next.:xyxthumbs
Stay tuned for "ranters and chanters", the next soapy.
 
Good to see a bit of honesty in the media, it happens occasionally. :D

From the article:

CNN and MSNBC thrived during the Trump years, reaching new heights in ratings and revenue while devoting countless prime-time hours to criticising a White House antagonist that their viewers just could not quit.

Now faced with a Trump-less future, top executives at the rival cable news networks have summoned star anchors and producers to private meetings in recent weeks, seeking answers to a pressing question: What's nex
t?

Yes the chooks will still need feeding, I guess we will have to wait and see what the media feeds up to the muppets next.:xyxthumbs
Stay tuned for "ranters and chanters", the next soapy.
I'm guessing its back to climate shilling.
 
Top