IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 7,653
- Reactions
- 4,730
I agree with all of that.I always struggle with the fact the likes of Court and Folau fail the most basic test of their own beliefs and thats the teachings of JC love and acceptance of all.
I also admire both (sporting prowess) but when they decide to go public using their status to push their views then they are fair game for opinions for or against those beliefs.
If there is free speech (there isnt) then its free for all not just for those who push their beliefs.
If there is free speech (there isnt) then its free for all not just for those who push their beliefs.
Here's the problem with your thinking: Court and Folau are welcome to think about really dumb stuff and in private they are welcome to espouse it to whoever they like. However, when they want to spread their vindictive views in public it is they who become the "bullies" and it is they who want others to share their ancient views.If it wasn't given airplay, no one would know anything about it, except for the few that visit the Church they are in and probably hold the same belief.
The ones who want to force them to change their beliefs, have the ear of the whole nation and use it to good effect.
But I know you love to argue, so I will leave it.
In other words they just don’t like them and want to take away something that many people enjoy watching, using the fires as a convenient excuse to push the agenda.
Same with a lot of things. It’s all about control not about what’s good or bad and the Left and Right are both guilty.
Like I said, it wasn't said in an interview, she was in her Church, the press is the one putting it into the public domain.Here's the problem with your thinking: Court and Folau are welcome to think about really dumb stuff and in private they are welcome to espouse it to whoever they like. However, when they want to spread their vindictive views in public it is they who become the "bullies" and it is they who want others to share their ancient views.
I have a suspicion that if Court was advocating slavery because it too is in the Bible, then your views might be a bit different.
Minorities continue to suffer at the hands of ignorant people and I personally find the idea of you or anyone supporting their persecutors to be anathema.
This is about what is happening in the public arena (maybe you have not yet worked out its reach?) and if you want to make it personal then take it out of this forum.How do you know what I have had to live through? Again pushing your beliefs while using unfounded aspersions, against people you know nothing about, to try to somehow garner the upper hand.
Sounds like a bully to me.
There is only you, who is getting personal Rob. I was only responding to your attack.This is about what is happening in the public arena (maybe you have not yet worked out its reach?) and if you want to make it personal then take it out of this forum.
There are very few who would think that the LGBQTI community either have been or are treated fairly, and for media personalities - and Court has put herself into the limelight - to continue to disparage them in the public arena is a low act.
Read what you have written: you are suggesting she is being bullied for her beliefs. Again, her beliefs are simply not at issue as it is where she is choosing to promulgate them that is the problem.
Please re-read the posts as I have consistently attacked the idea that thinking of Margaret Court as being bullied is completely back to front, and that you appear to think the opposite.There is only you who is getting personal Rob. I was only responding to your attack.
What if Court's views were put on facebook maliciously, as it may well have been, who knows?When Court's views are shared on Youtube your defence of her position becomes questionable unless you are of the view that it is ok for minorities to continue to be the subject of derision by personalities able to command a media profile. I would hope and trust that is not you.
From what i read, tennis is thinking about recognising transgender players in their chosen gender, Margaret Court said it will cause a lot of problems in women's tennis.Court's statement was regarding biological males playing against biological females being unfair, was it not (haven't really been paying that much attention so correct me if I'm wrong)?
I would have thought that that was a matter of scientific fact rather than any ancient belief. Absolutely fair comment and nothing to do with bullying whatsoever.
I thought this was the Australian way. Try and spoil the fun for everyone so we can go back to whinging about everything and being pissed off.
I may get bashed for this, but IMO Aussies are the greatest spoilsports and fun wreckers of all the nations on Earth. Remember when we used to accuse the Poms of being whingers? Now it's the Aussies who are the world champion whingers. No other nation even comes close. We have refined the art form.
As long as you don't have sand paper in your pocket, it doesn't work on a tennis ball anyway.I hope not different views are always welcome the answers not so much
I agree about the whinging but suspect we would disagree as to what about.
I think good Australian traits still around is a healthy cynicism and back yard cricket
As long as you don't have sand paper in your pocket, it doesn't work on a tennis ball anyway.
It wasn't long ago, that women would have been banned for a long time, for high testosterone levels.Court's statement was regarding biological males playing against biological females being unfair, was it not (haven't really been paying that much attention so correct me if I'm wrong)?
I would have thought that that was a matter of scientific fact rather than any ancient belief. Absolutely fair comment and nothing to do with bullying whatsoever.
Having read a few articles about 110kg "females" playing AFL and other sports it would seem that if those identifying as female choose to contest olympic events then those actually born female can forget about training for the Olympics.
Various places now allow the option of changing ones legal sex simply by filling in a form, I am surprised that the feminists have allowed this to happen as it will quickly spoil many of their gains.
If we use tennis as an example, even though they only play 60% of the games that men do they are now playing for the same prize money as men. Equality at last or is it preferable treatment at last (60% effort, 100% money) but anyway, imagine if all the men outside the top 100 all change their sex to female and contest the ladies tournament.
The feminists would be in an uproar wouldn't they ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?