- Joined
- 28 December 2013
- Posts
- 6,352
- Reactions
- 24,221
Not much point looking at paper trading until that is resolved. Profitable systematic trading is indeed possible, and trading rules can be simulated - but using incomplete data and poor modelling won't get you there.
Paper trading a flawed strategy
Originally, I decided to halt my paper trading of the strategy until I could fix the data issues and re-run the backtests properly. However, upon further reflection, I realised there is value in proceeding with the paper trading as-is. Even though the backtest results are biased, paper trading the flawed strategy can still provide an important educational lesson for me.
Trading with an edge
@ducati916 often talks about a "true edge". With @Richard Dale's words ringing in my ears, I have to agree that using any Norgate data subscription level below "Platinum" can create an illusion of an edge.
Limited value
The initial first week's performance at the end of trade today is disheartening, it simply exposes critical flaws in my development process and reliance on incomplete data. Seeing the strategy crash and burn highlights the sizable gaps that can exist between backtested theory and live practice. Though painful, failure can be a humbling process when paper trading a new strategy. Rather than feeling discouraged, I will take this as a pivotal learning experience to improve my processes going forward.
Skate.