- Joined
- 28 December 2013
- Posts
- 6,392
- Reactions
- 24,319
The main advantage of technical analysis is that it allows traders to make data-driven decisions based on historical market data.
System trading can be a great tool for traders, but keep in mind that it is not a failsafe method by any means. There is no trading method that can guarantee profits or protect against losses. However, utilising a system can assist bring structure and discipline to a trader's approach, increasing the likelihood of long-term success.
Discretionary trading is an alternative to system trading in which trades are made based on a trader's subjective judgement of the market. While discretionary trading provides flexibility and adaptability, it is also susceptible to emotions, biases, and other factors that can lead to poor decision-making.
System trading, on the other hand, relies on objective rules and algorithms to identify and execute trades. This can aid in the removal of emotional biases and the consistency of trading decisions.
Overall, while system trading may not always work, it can be a useful tool for traders who wish to approach the market with discipline and structure. Traders can boost their chances of long-term success by combining a well-developed method with effective risk management practices.
Skate.
Yes I think most futures traders do that. There's also a growing cohort of retail traders using machine learning, sentiment analysis and other forms of AI. GPT4 can do fundamental analysis at a high level, spitting out reports that would match those done by brokers, eg.For the benefit of those new to trading I will add something to @Skate 's post;
There is another variation of discretionary trading that is more common than the completely discretionary type of trading that Skate has described, that is, where the market to trade is chosen in a discretionary way but the method used to make the trade is completely systematic.
This type of hybrid trading method is very common and for this reason a lot of the techniques that Skate is describing to you regarding his totally mechanical method also can be applied to many discretionary trading methods.
An inventive but tenuous and strained analogy.
"Truth will not be organized and is a pathless land" by notme
View attachment 159375
The "Percentage Up" filter
I appreciate you don't have to be "Einstein" to know when only 20% of the All Ordinaries index is advancing, eeking out a profit is difficult.
Overall, the "Percentage Up" filter is a useful tool that can provide valuable insights into market trends and conditions. If a high percentage of stocks have increased in value, it may suggest an uptrend, while a low percentage such as today indicates a downtrend.
However, it's essential to remember that no single filter or indicator can provide a complete picture of market conditions. Traders should always use multiple filters and technical indicators in conjunction with each other to gain a more comprehensive understanding of market trends to make informed trading decisions.
Skate.
An interesting chart + indicator. Not sure how exactly you use it but just on this:
1. The 3 boxed signals are: (i) closing higher than the range of the preceding bar, (ii) signal the start of a move.
2. The last signal, unboxed, (iii) did not close higher than the range of the preceding bar. The signal (has to date) failed.
I'm guessing your chart runs from about Oct. last year. With context, and I'm sure why you use additional indicators, the quality of the signal is materially different. In this case lower quality.
So the issue always is: given an analysis that runs 5,6,7 indicators, when they contradict one another, is there a hierarchy or scoring system that gives a green light or red?
You do allude to this in your post, but do not amplify. Curious as to the final arbiter. Discretionary or mechanical?
The "Percentage Up" filter - Not sure how exactly you use it but just on this:
1. The 3 boxed signals are: (i) closing higher than the range of the preceding bar, (ii) signal the start of a move. 2. The last signal, unboxed, (iii) did not close higher than the range of the preceding bar. The signal (has to date) failed. 3. With context, and I'm sure why you use additional indicators, the quality of the signal is materially different. In this case lower quality.
(1) Curious as to the final arbiter. Discretionary or mechanical? (2) So the issue always is: given an analysis that runs 5,6,7 indicators, when they contradict one another, (3) Is there a hierarchy or scoring system that gives a green light or red?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?