- Joined
- 28 May 2006
- Posts
- 9,985
- Reactions
- 2
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/02/26/2172717.htm
Hey Julia, I just found it interesting ok ?. (And I also think it was an appropriate topic for "Aust Story") .
Nicole Cornes was virtually the only Labor candidate to go backwards on election day (swing against the trend etc).
I don't know the other candidate, I wouldn't be at all surprised if he/she was better - probably much better. Still I came away from this "Aust Story" surprised - this bird wasn't as dumb a blonde as the press had presented her. (imo)
And there were some good self-analysis of the press. Probably in the same sense as I really enjoy Media Watch. They (the media that is ) can be totally unscrupulous and totally unfair.
Here's an article by Dr Kathie Muir, a senior lecturer in Gender, Work and Social Inquiry, in the School of Social Science at the University of Adelaide. This article makes many comments about women in politics, - also (true) that inexperience sure didn't help in Nicole Cornes' case.
No question Nicole was super-inexperienced, but the point I didn't like was the selective editing by the media. You saw the entire media question-and-answer session - she answers a stack of questions - then as she's desparately trying to break away to attend another appointment - and the aggressive reporters refuse to cooperate - (she'd have been entitled to get angry but she didn't) - she throws in one comment as she hurries away "(for any further questions) please ring my campaign manager"
So guess which comment makes the evening news - just that one - the implication being that she didn't answer or can't answer any questions.
Here are a couple of comments after that ABC article :- I lean towards the second version - but no biggie. Thanks for another interesting doco ABC
Hey Julia, I just found it interesting ok ?. (And I also think it was an appropriate topic for "Aust Story") .
Nicole Cornes was virtually the only Labor candidate to go backwards on election day (swing against the trend etc).
I don't know the other candidate, I wouldn't be at all surprised if he/she was better - probably much better. Still I came away from this "Aust Story" surprised - this bird wasn't as dumb a blonde as the press had presented her. (imo)
And there were some good self-analysis of the press. Probably in the same sense as I really enjoy Media Watch. They (the media that is ) can be totally unscrupulous and totally unfair.
Here's an article by Dr Kathie Muir, a senior lecturer in Gender, Work and Social Inquiry, in the School of Social Science at the University of Adelaide. This article makes many comments about women in politics, - also (true) that inexperience sure didn't help in Nicole Cornes' case.
Colour, emotion
Women politicians and political candidates face particular challenges in the context of mediatised politics.
Women in public life have always struggled to be judged on their performance and their skills rather than their appearance. Despite the rising numbers of female politicians, they are still framed as the exception and regarded as having at least potential novelty value.
In a landscape of boring grey suits they stand out. News editors and journalists look to female political candidates to supply the colour, the visual appeal, and the emotional element of political reporting.
Female candidates, always desperate for the oxygen of publicity, are offered coverage but asked to participate in trite or demeaning photo shoots to 'ensure' the story will be run. Alison Roger's book The Natasha Factor details some of Stott Despoja's experiences in relation to news photographs.
... Julia Gillard's hairstyle and dress sense has been subjected to ridiculous levels of public criticism and her contest with the Liberal's Julie Bishop dubbed 'the style wars' etc .
Scent of blood
The media pack scented blood, with Cornes becoming a regular object of ridicule. She became the exemplar of all that was wrong with celebrity candidates.
........
It took on the elements of an ugly spectator sport with people queuing up for a chance to throw a stone. Cornes experienced the worst of the Australian press gallery in operation.
......
It was an unedifying but instructive episode in the complex relations of media, gender and politics in Australia.
No question Nicole was super-inexperienced, but the point I didn't like was the selective editing by the media. You saw the entire media question-and-answer session - she answers a stack of questions - then as she's desparately trying to break away to attend another appointment - and the aggressive reporters refuse to cooperate - (she'd have been entitled to get angry but she didn't) - she throws in one comment as she hurries away "(for any further questions) please ring my campaign manager"
So guess which comment makes the evening news - just that one - the implication being that she didn't answer or can't answer any questions.
Here are a couple of comments after that ABC article :- I lean towards the second version - but no biggie. Thanks for another interesting doco ABC
Jen : Nicole Cornes was ridiculed because she was an idiot....not because she was a woman. If the media had ignored her ridiculous performance as a political candidate she might have ended up as a member of parliament, responsible for passing laws affecting all of us. This is a much scarier prospect for the women of Australia.
Tan: I don't totally agree that Nicole Corners is an idoit, because she doing her Masters degree, she is probably better behind the scenes than in the limelight. I do agree that if the media had ignored her she would have won the seat and would have done well serving her community. The media is good at creating pollies just look at Pauline Hanson, if the media had ignored her we would have all been better off.