anon said:New Girl,
I must say that I do enjoy your posts. A clear strong thinker who doesn't constantly call up this or that link for support.
Have I buttered you up enough to ask you a silly question? About sex? I think.
It had been frequently reported in the media that the suicide bombers, or "martyrs" as the radical muslims regard them, are rewarded with 72 (seventy two) virgins up there in heaven. My mind boggles that some rational people would think that any male could service so many virgins without doing some physical damage to himself. To me this would be a punishment and not a reward. Kill them by kindness, but kill them all the same. Some would say - what a way to go. My own view is to stay alive and enjoy sex for a lot onger.
What I want to know is whether this 72 virgins reward promise is a fact or is fiction of the western media.
Any comments???
anon
Hi Julia,Julia said:New Girl
Perhaps it's time for a sleep or a visit to the gym to work off some of your antagonism.
Prospector's post made a good point.
I find your response unnecessarily offensive.
A forum is about anyone who is interested contributing their thoughts.
You are entitled to yours, but you are not entitled to attempt to belittle the contributions of others.
A couple of times, I've begun to contribute my own thoughts to this thread, but have decided it's descended into a rather hysterical squabble.
It would be good to return to the actual title of the thread.
Julia
2) If you have watched enough ABC TV on the topic then you would know that he SURRENDERED as soon as he found out what had happened in the US.
I have to agree that David Hicks was captured.trading_rookie said:C'mon Chops you're sounding very gullible there! If he's been brainwashed to believe the West is evil and the US devil must be destroyed I find it very hard to accept he surrended. Wasn't he also a mercenary with the Albanian KLA? A terrorist organisation?
ps - Even the socialist alliance website quotes that he was 'captured' during the closing days of the war.
I doubt they would have been called terrorists, because they were on the same side as NATO.trading_rookie said:C'mon Chops you're sounding very gullible there! If he's been brainwashed to believe the West is evil and the US devil must be destroyed I find it very hard to accept he surrended. Wasn't he also a mercenary with the Albanian KLA? A terrorist organisation?
2020hindsight said:How the hell Hicks hasn't gone mad (or maybe he has?) is amazing.
Let's not forget the captured "allies" flipped like flies during the Korean brainwashing days.
PS might have to pin you down one of these days Julia -- what's your opinion of a man's right to a fair trial?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200702/s1837872.htm
Germany issues warrants to arrest CIA agents
Germany has ordered the arrest of 13 suspected CIA agents over the alleged rendition of one of its citizens.
Prosecutors in Munich have confirmed that the warrants are linked to the case of Khaled al-Masri - a German national of Lebanese descent. In 2003, Mr al-Masri was on holiday in Macedonia when he says he was abducted by the CIA, flown to a secret prison in Afghanistan and tortured.
He says he was released in Albania five months later when the Americans realised they had the wrong man.
The warrants are based on information from Spanish police, where the flight carrying Mr al-Masri is thought to have originated. Prosecutors say the names on the warrants are all aliases and their next step will be to find out the real names of the suspects.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200701/s1837355.htm
Stott Despoja predicts election backlash over Hicks
Democrats Senator Natasha Stott Despoja says the Federal Government will suffer at the election if it does not allow David Hicks to be examined by a team of independent medical experts.
Mr Hicks refused to meet an Australian consular official overnight because he feared he would be punished. Senator Stott Despoja wants a cross-party delegation to go to Guantanamo Bay to meet Mr Hicks and check on conditions at the camp.
She says an independent medical team should also be flown to Cuba to check on Mr Hicks's health. "His emotional, physical and mental state is, at best, questionable," she said., etc
Gee, you start to wonder if, just as Saddam's executioners have embarrassed themselves on illegally taped footage - being shown to be ridiculing Saddam to the very end of his life (yuk), so too the Americans with Hicks? except they aren't embarrassed maybe?Kauri said:I have just heard on the radio that the Americans have admitted forcing Dave Hicks to look at photos of Saddams execution. They claim it was for his intellectual stimulation...
I like to separate the two cases. Saddam Hussein was a ruthless dictator, but by executing him they've turned him into a "martyr" for extremists.2020hindsight said:Gee, you start to wonder if, just as Saddam's executioners have embarrassed themselves on illegally taped footage - being shown to be ridiculing Saddam to the very end of his life (yuk), so too the Americans with Hicks? except they aren't embarrassed maybe?
How can a man go on trial after months of being treated like this?
We are seeing this for just one Australian, - it starts to sink in what Palestinians and others must feel about these "champions of democratic justice" that USA claim to be? Someone should tell the USA that this is seriously counterproductive.
Hi 2020hindsight,2020hindsight said:I like a quote from Richard Gere's movie "Primal Fear"
"If you want justice go to a whorehouse
If you want to get fu**ed go to court"
I think he meant to (an american govt manipulated) court"
there's that word "military tribunal" again.http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200702/s1839545.htm
The chief US military prosecutor at Guantanamo Bay wants to charge him with attempted murder and offering material support for terrorism. Both offences carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The US has dropped previous charges of aiding the enemy and conspiracy.
The new charges need to be formally approved by the Pentagon official overseeing the military tribunal process before Hicks can again face trial.
Hicks's US military lawyer, Major Michael Mori, has questioned why his client has been charged with attempted murder when even the chief prosecutor agrees Hicks never fired a shot at anyone in Afghanistan.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200702/s1839820.htm
Govt challenged over Hicks 'retrospective' charge
The Federal Opposition has accused the Government of double-standards over the draft charges announced for David Hicks. The 31-year-old is set to be charged with attempted murder and providing material support for terrorism.
Labor's Kelvin Thomson says the second charge is retrospective as it was only passed into American law last year.
He has questioned why the Australian Government will not introduce retrospective laws to try Hicks here. "Will [Attorney-General] Philip Ruddock raise with the US its plan to try David Hicks under a retrospective law or does he believe that it's not okay to charge David Hicks in Australia under retrospective Australian law, but it is okay to charge David Hicks under retrospective American law at Guantanamo Bay," he says.
Meanwhile, lawyers for Mr Hicks have warned the Prime Minister a trial is a long way off, despite the announcement of draft charges. His Sydney-based lawyer, John North, has told Channel Seven there is still pressure on John Howard to call for Mr Hicks's release.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?