This isn't true either.Not quite.
Here's the offending tweet.
He also responded to Trump's conspiracy theories about China leaking the virus via twitter - effectively a tit for tat - by linking to a well known conspiracy theory circulation in Asia about USA being responsible. US pressure on the source of that link led to it being removed: remind you of any other government that might do that?
Zhao did exactly what the US was doing; spreading baseless rumours. It's not a good look to us back in Oz, but it has never been an official line of the Chinese government that the US actually did what was linked.
CGTN represents the government line as much as Fox does in the USA.This isn't true either.
China Global Television Network (CGTN which Rob and had quoted from) published an article on March 22 blaming Italy. Cgtn is the govt propaganda mouthpiece along with a lot of others.
They also had a guy Chen Xuyan, a scientist based in Beijing,appeared on CCTV on March 18 blaming the US.
The Lancet also took the CDC to task for its botched rollout of diagnostic testing in the critical early weeks that the virus began to spread in the United States. The country remains ill-equipped to provide basic surveillance or laboratory testing to combat the disease, the journal said.The authors accused the administration of undermining some of the CDC's top officials, saying the agency "has seen its role minimised and become an ineffective and nominal adviser."
They noted that the agency, which is supposed to be the primary contact for health authorities during crises, has been hamstrung by years of budget cuts. The editorial said the administration left an "intelligence vacuum" in China when it pulled the last CDC officer from the country in July 2019.
..originally in The Washington Post"There is no doubt that the CDC has made mistakes, especially on testing in the early stages of the pandemic," the editorial said. "But punishing the agency by marginalising and hobbling it is not the solution. "The Administration is obsessed with magic bullets - vaccines, new medicines, or a hope that the virus will simply disappear," it continued. "But only a steadfast reliance on basic public health principles, like test, trace, and isolate, will see the emergency brought to an end, and this requires an effective national public health agency.".
China's oft repeated official position is as below, in response to a question from the media:
Q: At an interview with AXIOS and HBO, Chinese ambassador to the United States Cui Tiankai said that it was "crazy and very harmful for diplomats to speculate about the origins of the coronavirus". Is it the official position of the Chinese foreign ministry?A major difference between the USA and China relates to who is out there helping other nations. While people can complain about the lack of quality of some Chinese products, at least China was able to offer something rather than nothing. It's also the case that some nations chose to bypass China's quality assured manufacturers to buy PPE on the cheap. Anyhow, here's some of the countries China has sent expert medical teams to since the outbreak:
A: Recently I have stated China's position repeatedly here on this podium, and I would like to stress that once again.
The origin of the novel coronavirus is a matter of science that requires scientific and professional assessment. There is a clear consensus by WHO and the international community that a virus should not be linked to any specific country, region or ethnic group and such stigmatization should be rejected.
Zhao did exactly what the US was doing; spreading baseless rumours. It's not a good look to us back in Oz, but it has never been an official line of the Chinese government that the US actually did what was linked.
True.Point taken.
There is an issue however in that if someone is employed by a government and is speaking or otherwise communicating in an official capacity then it is normally taken that their comments represent the official position of the government in question unless it's clearly stated as a purely personal view.
IMO there will be one before the end of the year.there really isn't going to be a vaccine any time soon or indeed if at all IMO
I hope you are right, it would be great to nullify this thing, also it would be like lighting a fuse under stock markets.IMO there will be one before the end of the year.
I hope you are right, it would be great to nullify this thing, also it would be like lighting a fuse under stock markets.
If it is rushed out too early, the big problem could be the cure is worse than the disease, so to speak.There would be a risk that it would be rushed out too quickly only to find it didn't work.
Then all hell would break loose.
If it is rushed out too early, the big problem could be the cure is worse than the disease, so to speak.
They still haven't got a vaccine for HIV, and they have been trying for years, so there is no reason this can't follow the same trajectory just my opinion.
The U.S will do what it always does, charge ahead with the ultimate self confidence, Australia will require the drug to undergo the correct testing IMO.Yes, it could be a lot harder than we thought. I wonder whether someone like Trump will listen to the medical advice and do proper tests, or just rush it out to get a quick fix.
In 2013, the Pew Research Center reported that 37% of all Americans attended church on a weekly basis.
In its turn, Gallup estimated the once-a-week church attendance of the Americans in 2013 as 39%.
90% - I think it has been less than 50% for a while. They definitely think they are the chosen ones, just ask them to locate (or name) any other country on a map, LOL90% go to church, they think they are gods chosen children and Trump is their sort of guy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?