- Joined
- 28 May 2020
- Posts
- 6,266
- Reactions
- 11,872
Can neither confirm not deny... Comments?
I was a bit sceptical of this (I mean its on Twitter), so I hunted around and found something..
According to Australian Doctors News its true in at least two states.
MickGPs could face fines up to $20,000 for improper use of coronavirus serology tests aer at least two states have prohibited their use for diagnostic purposes.
Minister for Health Greg Hunt announced last month that the Federal Government had secured 1.5 million of the point-of-care tests to be used in general practices in the fight against COVID-19.
"They will allow us to assist with greater testing of health workers themselves to give them the confidence and — where appropriate — patients," he said at the time. The tests, given fast-track approval by the TGA, detect IgM and IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 from venous or fingerprick blood samples placed on a test strip. While they can produce results in about 15-30 minutes, experts have raised concerns about false-negative rates and warn they are unreliable for detection of acute COVID-19. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia on Wednesday warned the tests had a “fundamental limitation” because antibodies could take up to 12 days to develop, long aer a person becomes infectious. Instead, PCR tests, which detect fragments of the virus and have been used in Australia so far, should continue to be the diagnostic gold-standard test, it says.
Now, two states have used emergency powers to prohibit anyone from using a point-of-care serological test as an acute illness diagnostic tool. The tests are due to arrive "within days", according to the Federal Government. In WA, GPs who oer the tests can be fined up to $20,000, while companies face fines of up to $100,000 under the state’s Public Health Act. The WA Department of Health said they made the declaration because of concerns about the “serious limitations” of the tests, which oered an “unacceptable risk” of community transmission due to false negatives. Health oicials stressed that the serological tests could be used as a screening tool for people aer they have had the infection or for the purpose of public health research. SA also announced a ban on Thursday, with oicials declaring that use of the tests “may adversely aect the prevention, control and abatement of the serious public health risk presented by COVID-19”. The State Government said the ban would apply to anyone outside SA Pathology employees or public health services, with police able to issue fines of up to $1000 to GPs and $5000 to companies that ordered the test.