- Joined
- 15 March 2006
- Posts
- 469
- Reactions
- 0
See the following link for an excellent (and very simple) refutation of the guy predicting "a Nuclear Winter for Commods" a number of months ago
http://www.kitco.com/ind/resopp/mar292007.html
All basic and very boring fundamental research that covers the underlying trend for the majority of commodities.
Here are the bear's comments
http://www.kitco.com/ind/veneroso/nov062006.pdf
In the 6 months since Veneroso penned this piece, how many of the following have been discovered or had a completed BFS:
1. A major copper deposit offering more than 150,000 kt Cu production
2. A decent Nickel Sulphide deposit
3. A major Oil/gas reserve
Six months has not produced a lot of new supply (that would come on line in about five to ten years) despite the apparently massive flow of exploration money.
The commodities bull is well intact.
http://www.kitco.com/ind/resopp/mar292007.html
All basic and very boring fundamental research that covers the underlying trend for the majority of commodities.
Here are the bear's comments
http://www.kitco.com/ind/veneroso/nov062006.pdf
In the 6 months since Veneroso penned this piece, how many of the following have been discovered or had a completed BFS:
1. A major copper deposit offering more than 150,000 kt Cu production
2. A decent Nickel Sulphide deposit
3. A major Oil/gas reserve
Six months has not produced a lot of new supply (that would come on line in about five to ten years) despite the apparently massive flow of exploration money.
The commodities bull is well intact.