You will.Freeballinginawetsuit said:Any potential market reaction in the post was specific to OZ, perhaps I should have put the 'Chinese 10% +-' on a separate line, wasn't really relevant in any context just the reversal fact.
Although not sure...I don't think Ours or the US markets have any margin rules in place, certainly not on individual stocks and as for indices....I have never seen a '10 percent down day' on an entire indice, since Ive been investing.
Depend whether this is the chicken or the egg... whether this is symptom or cause.BSD said:The day-to-day performance of the Chinese A-Class stockmarket has limited relevance to the vibrance of the Chinese economy.
BHP will be fine
Demand for commods will be fine
Chinese GDP and Industrial Production will be fine.
Neither will be effected by this bubble being pricked
Opportunity presents
Doesn't look like there is;Freeballinginawetsuit said:Is that the same for the OZ market as well Wayne?.
Of itself yes, but there are other cracks in the edifice... and in all the wrong placesBSD said:Yeah - well I am very happy to bet an unwinding of a Chinese sharemarket bubble is NOT going to limit the ongoing domestic GDP expansion of 10% per annum.
This is not the Dow or Nasdaq that created a consumption boom in the US in 1999.
What is the wealth-effect like in China?
Laughably small I would assume.
Lots of cracks in the Great Wall.wayneL said:Of itself yes, but there are other cracks in the edifice... and in all the wrong places
rederob said:Lots of cracks in the Great Wall.
But the economy of the great bastion of western democracy is now riddled with more holes than an Albanian highway, and that inevitable "crash" seems as far away as ever.
BTW, are commodities still tipped to collapse?
Or did they collapse and recover again?
Or, what do we really mean by "collapse" in the context of historically high prices?
They got copper pretty right, other metals, no. But there is still time for this to play out.Don't shoot the messenger! :whip
http://finance.news.com.au/story/0,10166,18993553-462,00.html
Commodity collapse tipped
From:
By Andrew Trounson
May 02, 2006
COMMODITY prices were likely to peak this year and were primed for a fall of up to 50 per cent, analysts warned yesterday as resource stocks again jumped sharply higher.
The gold price hit a 25-year high at $US661.10 an ounce, sparking fresh buying of mining stocks, despite a warning from Canberra-based Access Economics that metal prices are poised to start dropping steeply from the end of the year.
Gold shot up on the back of growing fears over the nuclear standoff between the US and Iran, and expectations that US rates are on hold.
This year will be as good as it gets in metal markets, according to Access's latest quarterly survey of 10 forecasters. Booming copper prices are forecast to fall about 50 per cent over the next two years, with other base metals to fall 30-40 per cent. Gold is forecast to be averaging $US564 an ounce a year from now.
WaynewayneL said:Red,
I draw you to the first post:
They got copper pretty right, other metals, no. But there is still time for this to play out.
For mine, the route is still to come... but note I am long metals and mining stocks at the moment. Bears may look to a correction, but we ain't dumb
The US housing market has been in decline for many months.Kimosabi said:What impact would it have on commodities if the US Housing/Subprime Mortgage continues self-destructing, thus impacting US Consumer Spending/Consumption etc?
WaynewayneL said:Red,
I draw you to the first post:
They got copper pretty right, other metals, no. But there is still time for this to play out.
For mine, the route is still to come... but note I am long metals and mining stocks at the moment. Bears may look to a correction, but we ain't dumb
That was enough collapse for me. I am now long... for nowrederob said:Wayne
Seems they got copper right for a little while only.
Copper up over 20% from its lows this year.
Most metals tighter now than last year, especially as "destocking" has left them more vulnerable to upside surprises as inventories continue to decline or show weakness.
This "collapse" could be another 20 years away!
wayneL next door at RC in response to possible copper long said:posted 15-01-2007 02:41 PM Profile for enzo Send New Private Message Edit/Delete Post
ZZ,
Been looking at that trade too. Started scaling last week.
--------------------
Almost a year since this thread began, and the base metals are running a repeat performance; ie running to new record highs in many cases.
At present, commodity market tightness is the rule and not the exception.
It is clear that supply side responses are inadequate, despite a 5-year ramp-up phase for most metal miners/producers.
Unless metals demand wanes, then prices in 2007 will be higher on average than 2006.
And we might also be setting-up 2008 for an even stronger year again!
That's certainly where I reckon we are heading right now. However, as always I review this longer term trend more deeply in the 3rd quarter.
Between now and then I'm not likely to move too much unless a clear meltdown comes into view.
Almost a year since this thread began, and the base metals are running a repeat performance; ie running to new record highs in many cases.
At present, commodity market tightness is the rule and not the exception.
It is clear that supply side responses are inadequate, despite a 5-year ramp-up phase for most metal miners/producers.
Unless metals demand wanes, then prices in 2007 will be higher on average than 2006.
And we might also be setting-up 2008 for an even stronger year again!
That's certainly where I reckon we are heading right now. However, as always I review this longer term trend more deeply in the 3rd quarter.
Between now and then I'm not likely to move too much unless a clear meltdown comes into view.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.