Perhaps it will and they will be accountable as a result. If that is what the voters want via the ballot box that is what we will get. It's not my cup of tea, but nor is dispassionate cruelty.
The Catholics tried to blow up the House of Lords with gunpowder, but we still let them in, even be half arsed Prime Minister and immigration minister on the few occasions.
Like I said, they get what they want , but it might not be what they expect.
The media pushed for Abbott to be rolled, because he wasn't receptive to them, the public opinion polls supported this, now we have Turnbull.
Turnbull now finds himself with the same problem Abbott had, all the facts regarding tax and welfare, and none of them palatable.
So the media now want Shorten and Labor, just have to convince Joe Average.
The roller coater will only stop, when someone calls it as it is and stops pandering to the press. Hang on Hockey tried that and it blew up in his face.
Best we just let everything reach rock bottom, then get a bit of desire and hunger back into the equation.
It's funny really, if we hadn't allowed this massive capital expenditure on increasing raw material extraction, would some other country like Brazil or Argentina now have the problem instead of us?
More likely a redistribution of existing aid if it goes down that path.
12 months is yet another demonstration of the short sightedness of the Gillard government on its measures and Richard Marles in his response above is forgetting something,
What do you suggest is the alternative ?
The problem with that is that we all know which half would ultimately be expected to pay for the social excesses.
Anything yet that makes in on your prevention index ?
I didn't expect you to have an answer to your own point but I'm also surprised to see you slip off that hollow moral pedestal with a personal slur.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
