- Joined
- 21 September 2008
- Posts
- 368
- Reactions
- 2
probably farmout of permit with maybe the issue of shares that weren't taken up in rights issue at a guess.
comment quote from mySA news
QUOTE
For some reason, the Express did not report some essential facts contained in the press release. First, Aref Energy Holding owns a 50% interest in 75,000 acres under lease in Dewitt County. The balance is held by "U.S. partners". The operator is Weber Energy, a private company based in Dallas, so Aref's name would not be on any of the permits or other filings with the Railroad Commission; that's why no one has heard of them. Halliburton is only a contractor being used by the operator; the release says Schlumberger may also be used. Two wells have been drilled so far. The reserve figures they give are very preliminary and I would not put a lot of stock in them. The release also refers to the Eagleford Shale, which extends over a number of counties in South and Southeast Texas, so presumably their discovery is in this formation. Being impermeable, this formation requires an expensive frac job before it will produce. So the real story is: they have drilled two wells in the Eagleford which appear to be capable of producing gas. That's great for them, but really not a big news story.
UNQUOTE
I don't think I would read too much into this , however the find appears to be close to the Karne's county border
If ADI can not farm out or sell whatever they need to to remain solvent this quarter, are they in trouble?
I note the halt has turned into suspension, pending an announcement regarding equity financing, so assume they are talking to a bank, or ??
Any of you long termers concerned?
not concerned on the adi front, since december adi has been announcing its intention to sell assets. as they have not announced their sale of any asset as yet i am of the opinion that near term considerations are being considered.
my outlook remains long term and these events unfolding are part of a proactive stance being taken over some time now.
Obviously it cannot have been planned like this, if they have to sell, then they have to sell, but are any holders worried that the price they will get for their assetts/leases are dramatically lower than 18 months ago?
Obviously it cannot have been planned like this, if they have to sell, then they have to sell, but are any holders worried that the price they will get for their assetts/leases are dramatically lower than 18 months ago?
I dont get your point Prawn.That can be said of a lot of stocks. Look at RIO and its attempt to sell assets, OZL and its problems and I wont start on the property trust sector, the Babcocks, AFG...the list could go on for a long time.
All assets and leases are worth a lot less now than 18 months ago. With the benefit of hindsight a lot of companies would have offloaded assets 18 months ago if they new how bad things were going to be.
Cheers
I dont get your point Prawn.That can be said of a lot of stocks. Look at RIO and its attempt to sell assets, OZL and its problems and I wont start on the property trust sector, the Babcocks, AFG...the list could go on for a long time.
All assets and leases are worth a lot less now than 18 months ago. With the benefit of hindsight a lot of companies would have offloaded assets 18 months ago if they new how bad things were going to be.
Cheers
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.