Whiskers
It's a small world
- Joined
- 21 August 2007
- Posts
- 3,266
- Reactions
- 1
Yep as i thought whiskers. Carry on mate.
I guess you also have the 23% drop in sugar in two days to worry about. Weren't you telling us how thats a significant driver of the Australia economy?
Mate give them some rope to play with before ya pull it tight.
No, I wouldn't in isolation either, prof. For me it's not about hanging everything on a single sign or signal, TA or FA, but weighing up the sum of all the signals.
Btw, actually it's probably not a strict 'Three Black Crows' since they actually should have opened higher than the previous close... but don't tell TH or I'll be running from a lynching party.
But since the markets have become automated and faster since these techniques were originally developed, I think one needs to look for the 'psychology' behind the configuration more than the strict geometry.
I have a small group who in time will be testing most setups rigorously under auditable conditions. The results will be interesting.
Tech/A,
can you give me examples of two setups you'll be testing?
Frank
The Plan is to test all VSA signals to start with
(1) Stand alone,Volume or Range close only or together.
Some are multiple bar setups.
(2) With Contributing analysis like Support /Resistance.
Stops/time in play/position in trend/background.
whiskers, I really can't see how this can even be considered as a piece of information to be used in building the case for a selloff.
On average, following that type of 3 day selloff, the market has been pretty well neutral/very slightly bearish for about 2 days, and is generally bullish afterwards.
Good luck, there’s a lot of work involved and I’ll look forward to the results.
I'll also be interested in what ‘entry’ you’ll be using to validate the testing.
Three black crows signals three days of rain, anybody knows that. Exactly whats happening here, the sky has sprung a leak.
If you're referring specifically to the Black Crows thingo... I did say "No, I wouldn't in isolation either".
I did say they were not a technically correct example, but for all intention purposes it looked the part. It really is the lowest priority or weighted element of that analysis, thrown in cos it nicely joined the dots of higher priority 'signs' ie FA, some other TA that I didn't mention, likely EW scenerios, trend, the Dark Cloud and the pennant.
Maybe you could show an example and I'll scruetenise whether it's the same as I'm talking about.
I think it is reasonable to expect some sideways consolidation after a relatively strong move to let the dust settle and reeveluate things. That sideways 'consolidation' appears to be all bearish so far within a larger pennant, decending triangle, or even maybe an EW Triangle wave b.
Either way I can't see any bullish signs yet. Even the FA today is starting to weigh a bit heavy on BHP.
Whiskers, it's truly astounding that you've missed my point, I don't think I could have been any clearer.
Good luck with your shorts, hope it works for you
No, I got your point... you said "I really can't see how this can even be considered as a piece of information to be used in building the case for a selloff."
That's OK if you don't see, prof. Different tradesmen prefer different tools.
I don't believe in luck... but thanks for the thought anyway
Everything happens for a reason... luck or chance are just ways to describe what we don't understand.
I am pretty sure you didn't get the point.
The point is, you are using a "tool", but you just reached into the toolbox and pulled out whatever felt like a spanner.
frink is pointing out the historical results on this pattern are not generally bearish, doesn't matter if you find it geometrically or just looking for the psychology of the move. Doesn't matter if it's the lowest weighted element. In fact, you should probably do some analysis and weight it higher!
If you go to thepatternsite link Gringotts posted, or just look at the snippet which TH pasted, you can see it is not recommended to use this pattern for shorting.
I can't believe this statement didn't give you pause:
"If you remove the 10 day restriction, then the worst performance comes from three black crows in a bull market, regardless of the breakout direction."
A check of the performance over 10 days shows some startling results: Do not trade this if the breakout is downward. Only upward breakouts are worth considering. If you remove the 10 day restriction, then the worst performance comes from three black crows in a bull market, regardless of the breakout direction.
Similarly with the Three Black Crows, the stronger the bull run the better the signal. There will be many cases of three lower highs and lower lows in a bear or choppy market.
I'm not convinced of this weakness. Had a look for short set ups last night and found nothing.
Nothing sinister yet to suggesst this is more than a retracement.
Will be going long is signs of strength appear after lunch.
You may like to consider that while we may not have immediate signs other bourses like the US do.
I dont agree with you.
You may also be swayed by the 3 crows discussion---what if he's right!!
Trade what the market gives you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?