IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 7,471
- Reactions
- 4,467
Re: XAO Analysis
GP If I read your comments right your random trades were in only one direction or in the direction of the trend or that your testing resulted from random trades that were placed in the same direction of the prevailing trend. (wish I was more succinct)
As apposed to bottom picking which is against the prevailing trend.
Are there results for random trades counter trend?
My own win loss over the long term is generally no better than 50/50 but if I try to trade counter trend then I just don't get the home runs to pay for the losses.
I know there are plenty of counter trend strategies but I am just not that smart and stick with the simple
Hoping I make sense
That depends on the odds.
True gambling would best be simulated by totally random trades, and over the long term, the odds are in your favour (for long-only trades) as the market has trended up over such time frames.
Some time ago I (and others) did some backtests using completely random trades and the return was not surprisingly in line with the trend over the same time. However, survivorship bias needs to be considered, so the return would likely be somewhat lower than indicated by a backtest (this could be seen by comparing backtests over the all-ords and over the ASX200).
Similar to investing in an index fund I suppose.
GP
GP If I read your comments right your random trades were in only one direction or in the direction of the trend or that your testing resulted from random trades that were placed in the same direction of the prevailing trend. (wish I was more succinct)
As apposed to bottom picking which is against the prevailing trend.
Are there results for random trades counter trend?
My own win loss over the long term is generally no better than 50/50 but if I try to trade counter trend then I just don't get the home runs to pay for the losses.
I know there are plenty of counter trend strategies but I am just not that smart and stick with the simple
Hoping I make sense