I sure hope you're not a business teacherJust the principle of the thing. Just making the point that I liked this $4 billion injection into non-banks because banks have spent the whole year trying to squeeze out non-bank lenders.
Business 101- if you want to 'squeeze' someone out, you use your competitive advantage eg. lower cost base to drive prices to a level where the competition cannot sustain its business model
If the banks wanted to squeeze out the non-bank lenders they WOULDN'T have moved independently of the RBA. This would have put much greater pressure on the non-banks as their cost of funds is much higher.
On the one hand you're complaining that banks have their rates too low so that the non-banks can't compete and on the other hand you're writing letters demanding the pass on any RBA changes(which actually does squeeze the non-banks)
Which way is it? or are you just a serial complainer
I seriously doubt thisYes yes yes, I understand the mechanics of the crunch...